Design and analysis of multi-hospital kidney exchange mechanisms using random graphs

Kidney exchanges enable transplants when a pair of a patient and an incompatible donor is matched with other similar pairs. In multi-hospital kidney exchanges pairs are pooled from multiple hospitals, and each hospital is able to decide which pairs to report and which to hide and match locally. Modeling the problem as a maximum matching on a random graph, we first establish that the expected benefit from pooling scales as the square-root of the number of pairs in each hospital. We design the xCM mechanism, which achieves efficiency and incentivizes hospitals of moderate-to-large size to fully report their pairs. Reciprocal pairs are crucial in the design, with the probabilistic uniform rule used to ensure incentive alignment. By grouping certain pair types into so-called virtual-reciprocal pairs, xCM extends to handle 3-cycles. We validate the performance of xCM in simulation, demonstrating its efficiency and incentive advantages over the Bonus mechanism (Ashlagi and Roth, 2014).

[1]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Clinical results from transplanting incompatible live kidney donor/recipient pairs using kidney paired donation. , 2005, JAMA.

[2]  M. Stephanov,et al.  Random Matrices , 2005, hep-ph/0509286.

[3]  M. Utku Ünver,et al.  Increasing the Opportunity of Live Kidney Donation by Matching for Two- and Three-Way Exchanges , 2006, Transplantation.

[4]  A. Roth,et al.  Free riding and participation in large scale, multi‐hospital kidney exchange , 2014 .

[5]  F. A. Hayek The American Economic Review , 2007 .

[6]  L. Ross,et al.  Ethical issues in increasing living kidney donations by expanding kidney paired exchange programs. , 2000, Transplantation.

[7]  David C. Parkes,et al.  A random graph model of kidney exchanges: efficiency, individual-rationality and incentives , 2011, EC '11.

[8]  Avrim Blum,et al.  Clearing algorithms for barter exchange markets: enabling nationwide kidney exchanges , 2007, EC '07.

[9]  Dimitris Bertsimas,et al.  Fairness, Efficiency, and Flexibility in Organ Allocation for Kidney Transplantation , 2013, Oper. Res..

[10]  M. Utku Ünver,et al.  A nonsimultaneous, extended, altruistic-donor chain. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  R. Leighton,et al.  Feynman Lectures on Physics , 1971 .

[12]  Bettina Klaus,et al.  Probabilistic assignments of identical indivisible objects and uniform probabilistic rules , 2003 .

[13]  M. Utku Ünver,et al.  Efficient Kidney Exchange: Coincidence of Wants in a Markets with Compatibility-Based Preferences , 2009 .

[14]  Hervé Moulin,et al.  The proportional random allocation of indivisible units , 2002, Soc. Choice Welf..

[15]  Itai Ashlagi,et al.  Mix and match: A strategyproof mechanism for multi-hospital kidney exchange , 2013, Games Econ. Behav..

[16]  G. V. Balakin On Random Matrices , 1967 .

[17]  M. Utku Ünver,et al.  Dynamic Kidney Exchange , 2007 .

[18]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Dynamic Matching via Weighted Myopia with Application to Kidney Exchange , 2012, AAAI.

[19]  Robert Arnold,et al.  Ethical incentives--not payment--for organ donation. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Stefanos A. Zenios,et al.  PRIMUM NON NOCERE: AVOIDING HARM TO VULNERABLE WAIT LIST CANDIDATES IN AN INDIRECT KIDNEY EXCHANGE , 2001, Transplantation.

[21]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Optimizing kidney exchange with transplant chains: theory and reality , 2012, AAMAS.

[22]  Yves Sprumont The Division Problem with Single-Peaked Preferences: A Characterization of the Uniform Allocation Rule , 1991 .

[23]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  REPORT FROM A 60 TRANSPLANT CENTER MULTIREGIONAL KIDNEY PAIRED DONATION PROGRAM: 2 , 2008 .