Chromosome image enhancement using multiscale differential operators

Chromosome banding patterns are very important features for karyotyping, based on which cytogenetic diagnosis procedures are conducted. Due to cell culture, staining, and imaging conditions, image enhancement is a desirable preprocessing step before performing chromosome classification. In this paper, we apply a family of differential wavelet transforms (Wang and Lee, 1998), (Wang, 1999) for this purpose. The proposed differential filters facilitate the extraction of multiscale geometric features of chromosome images. Moreover, desirable fast computation can be realized. We study the behavior of both banding edge pattern and noise in the wavelet transform domain. Based on the fact that image geometrical features like edges are correlated across different scales in the wavelet representation, a multiscale point-wise product (MPP) is used to characterize the correlation of the image features in the scale-space. A novel algorithm is proposed for the enhancement of banding patterns in a chromosome image. In order to compare objectively the performance of the proposed algorithm against several existing image-enhancement techniques, a quantitative criteria, the contrast improvement ratio (CIR), has been adopted to evaluate the enhancement results. The experimental results indicate that the proposed method consistently outperforms existing techniques in terms of the CIR measure, as well as in visual effect. The effect of enhancement on cytogenetic diagnosis is further investigated by classification tests conducted prior to and following the chromosome image enhancement. In comparison with conventional techniques, the proposed method leads to better classification results, thereby benefiting the subsequent cytogenetic diagnosis.

[1]  Michael Unser,et al.  Splines: a perfect fit for signal and image processing , 1999, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[2]  A. Rosenfeld A nonlinear edge detection technique , 1970 .

[3]  D. L. Donoho,et al.  Ideal spacial adaptation via wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[4]  R M Rangayyan,et al.  Feature enhancement of film mammograms using fixed and adaptive neighborhoods. , 1984, Applied optics.

[5]  Andrew F. Laine,et al.  Speckle reduction and contrast enhancement of echocardiograms via multiscale nonlinear processing , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Giuseppe Boccignone,et al.  Multiscale contrast enhancement , 2001 .

[7]  Jong Kook Kim,et al.  Adaptive mammographic image enhancement using first derivative and local statistics , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Zhongmin Liu,et al.  The effect of image enhancement on biomedical pattern recognition , 2002, Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society] [Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[9]  Wen-Rong Wu,et al.  Image Contrast Enhancement Based on a Histogram Transformation of Local Standard Deviation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[10]  Yu-Ping Wang,et al.  Multiscale curvature-based shape representation using B-spline wavelets , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  Yu-Ping Wang,et al.  Image representations using multiscale differential operators , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  D. Donoho,et al.  Translation-Invariant De-Noising , 1995 .

[13]  Dennis M. Healy,et al.  Wavelet transform domain filters: a spatially selective noise filtration technique , 1994, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  A. Rosenfeld,et al.  Edge and Curve Detection for Visual Scene Analysis , 1971, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[15]  Azeddine Beghdadi,et al.  Contrast enhancement technique based on local detection of edges , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[16]  Brian M. Sadler,et al.  Analysis of Multiscale Products for Step Detection and Estimation , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[18]  Giovanni Ramponi,et al.  Image enhancement via adaptive unsharp masking , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  Chang Beom Ahn,et al.  Adaptive template filtering for signal-to-noise ratio enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Fred J. Taylor,et al.  Enhancement via fusion of mammographic features , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[22]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Characterization of Signals from Multiscale Edges , 2011, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[23]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  Wavelet-based histogram equalization enhancement of gastric sonogram images. , 2000, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[24]  Yu-Ping Wang,et al.  Scale-Space Derived From B-Splines , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[25]  Dennis M. Healy,et al.  Contrast enhancement via multiscale gradient transformation , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[26]  Hayit Greenspan,et al.  Image enhancement by nonlinear extrapolation in frequency space , 1994, Electronic Imaging.

[27]  Sanjit K. Mitra,et al.  A new class of nonlinear filters for image enhancement , 1991, [Proceedings] ICASSP 91: 1991 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[28]  Kenneth R. Castleman,et al.  Multiscale image enhancement of chromosome banding patterns , 1996, Optics & Photonics.