Deterministic Dynamic Logic is Strictly Weaker than Dynamic Logic
暂无分享,去创建一个
There is a language L and structures A1 and A2 for L such that, for each closed formula F of deterministic regular dynamic logic, the formula F is valid in A1 if and only if F is valid in A2. There is, however, a closed formula of nondeterministic regular dynamic logic is both valid in A1 and not valid in A2. Thus, nondeterminism adds to the expressive power even in the presence of quantifiers. This answers Meyer's question. Moreover, the proof here, unlike that of Berman, Halpern, and Tiuryn (1982, in “Automata, Language, and Programming,” Springer, Berlin), holds in the presence of first-order tests as well as quantifier-free tests.
[1] Sergei Ivanovich Adian,et al. The Burnside problem and identities in groups , 1979 .
[2] Jerzy Tiuryn,et al. On the Power of Nondeterminism in Dynamic Logic , 1982, ICALP.
[3] Karl Winklmann,et al. Expressing Program Looping in Regular Dynamic Logic , 1982, Theor. Comput. Sci..
[4] Jerzy Tiuryn. Harel David. First-order dynamic logic. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 68. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, and New York, 1979, X + 133 pp. , 1982 .