Broadband neural encoding in the cricket cereal sensory system enhanced by stochastic resonance

SENSORY systems are often required to detect a small amplitude signal embedded in broadband background noise. Traditionally, ambient noise is regarded as detrimental to encoding accuracy. Recently, however, a phenomenon known as stochastic resonance has been described in which, for systems with a nonlinear threshold, increasing the input noise level can actually improve the output signal-to-noise ratio over a limited range of signal and noise strengths. Previous theoretical and experimental studies of stochastic resonance in physical1–7and biological6–10 systems have dealt exclusively with single-frequency sine stimuli embedded in a broadband noise background. In the past year it has been shown in a theoretical and modelling study that stochastic resonance can be observed with broadband signals11,12. Here we demonstrate that broadband stochastic resonance is manifest in the peripheral layers of neural processing in a simple sensory system, and that it plays a role over a wide range of biologically relevant stimulus parameters. Further, we quantify the functional significance of the phenomenon within the context of signal processing, using information theory.

[1]  Wiesenfeld,et al.  Theory of stochastic resonance. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[2]  William Bialek,et al.  Bits and brains: Information flow in the nervous system , 1993 .

[3]  Roy,et al.  Observation of stochastic resonance in a ring laser. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[4]  William Bialek,et al.  Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: coding and information transfer in short spike sequences , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  J P Miller,et al.  Representation of sensory information in the cricket cercal sensory system. II. Information theoretic calculation of system accuracy and optimal tuning-curve widths of four primary interneurons. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Sutera,et al.  The mechanism of stochastic resonance , 1981 .

[7]  J. Miller,et al.  Representation of sensory information in the cricket cercal sensory system. I. Response properties of the primary interneurons. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Kurt Wiesenfeld,et al.  Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDs , 1995, Nature.

[9]  Zhou,et al.  Analog simulations of stochastic resonance. , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[10]  Frank Moss,et al.  STOCHASTIC RESONANCE: TUTORIAL AND UPDATE , 1994 .

[11]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Aperiodic stochastic resonance in excitable systems. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[12]  Jeffrey M. Camhi,et al.  THE ESCAPE BEHAVIOR OF THE COCKROACH PERIPLANETA AMERICANA. II. DETECTION OF NATURAL PREDATORS BY AIR DISPLACEMENT , 1978 .

[13]  S. Fauve,et al.  Stochastic resonance in a bistable system , 1983 .

[14]  Frank Moss,et al.  Noise enhancement of information transfer in crayfish mechanoreceptors by stochastic resonance , 1993, Nature.

[15]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Stochastic resonance without tuning , 1995, Nature.

[16]  K. Schäfer,et al.  Oscillation and noise determine signal transduction in shark multimodal sensory cells , 1994, Nature.

[17]  A. Bulsara,et al.  Stochastic resonance in a single neuron model: theory and analog simulation. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.