Stereotypes and the Construal of Individuating Information

When stereotypes affect judgment about individuals in the presence of individuating information, they may do so by affecting the construal of that information. Therefore stereotypes may affect judgment even if perceivers subsequently neglect the stereotypes or base rates and base their impressions only on these stereotype-driven construals of the individuating information. Two experiments showed that stereotypes affected judgments about targets in the presence of the same ambiguous individuating information that was open to multiple construals, but not in the presence of the same specific disambiguated construals of that information. A third experiment showed that the effects of stereotypes on target ratings in the presence of ambiguous individuating information were mediated by the construals of this information. Thus all subjects relied predominantly on the individuating information, but when it was ambiguous, it was construed differently, depending on the stereotype.

[1]  S. Fein,et al.  The role of typical diagnosticity in stereotype-based judgments. , 1989 .

[2]  Cynthia Nelson,et al.  What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions , 1988 .

[3]  J. Krueger,et al.  Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable. , 1988 .

[5]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Problem solving in judgment under uncertainty. , 1987 .

[6]  Gail Clark Futoran,et al.  The effects of traits and gender stereotypes on occupational suitability judgments and the recall of judgment-relevant information☆ , 1986 .

[7]  Y. Trope.  Identification and Inferential Processes in Dispositional Attribution. , 1986 .

[8]  M. Manis,et al.  Stereotypes and social judgment. , 1986 .

[9]  M. Heilman.  Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination: The effects of applicant sex and information type on preliminary employment decisions☆ , 1984 .

[10]  James A. Kulik,et al.  Confirmatory attribution and the perpetuation of social beliefs. , 1983 .

[11]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. , 1982 .

[12]  R. Wyer.  Changes in meaning and halo effects in personality impression formation. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Graham Fk,et al.  Performance of brain-damaged cases on a memory-for-designs test. , 1946 .

[14]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[15]  P. Devine.  Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[16]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  J. Darley,et al.  A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. , 1983 .

[18]  Anne Locksley,et al.  Social stereotypes and judgments of individuals: An instance of the base-rate fallacy , 1982 .

[19]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Sex stereotypes and social judgment , 1980 .

[20]  W. Mischel,et al.  Prototypes in Person Perception1 , 1979 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .