Why not empower knowledge workers and lifelong learners to develop their own environments

In industrial and educational practice, learning environments are designed and implemented by experts from many different fields, reaching from traditional software development and product management to pedagogy and didactics. Workplace and lifelong learning, however, implicate that learners are more self-motivated, capable, and self-confident in achieving their goals and, consequently, tempt to consider that certain development tasks can be shifted to end-users in order to facilitate a more flexible, open, and responsive learning environment. With respect to streams like end-user development and opportunistic design, this paper elaborates a methodology for user-driven environment design for action-based activities. Based on a former research approach named 'Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments'(MUPPLE) we demonstrate how workplace and lifelong learners can be empowered to develop their own environment for collaborating in learner networks and which prerequisites and support facilities are necessary for this methodology.

[1]  W. Buxton Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[2]  Martin C. Maguire,et al.  Methods to support human-centred design , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Fridolin Wild,et al.  Distributed feed networks for learning , 2008 .

[4]  Marcus Specht,et al.  Ten-Competence: Life-Long Competence Development and Learning , 2006 .

[5]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Meta-design , 2004, Commun. ACM.

[6]  E. Trist The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Action Research Program , 1981 .

[7]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[8]  JaatunMartin Gilje,et al.  Agile Software Development , 2002, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[9]  Colin Tattersall,et al.  A design model for lifelong learning networks , 2005, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[10]  Fridolin Wild,et al.  Language design for a personal learning environment design language , 2008 .

[11]  Fridolin Wild,et al.  Sharing Good Practice through Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments , 2009, ICWL.

[12]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  Hacking , Mashing , Gluing : A Study of Opportunistic Design and Development , 2006 .

[14]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[15]  Stefanie N. Lindstaedt,et al.  A Context-Model for Supporting Work-Integrated Learning , 2006, EC-TEL.

[16]  K. Beck,et al.  Extreme Programming Explained , 2002 .

[17]  M. Alvesson Knowledge Work: Ambiguity, Image and Identity , 2001 .

[18]  HENRY LIEBERMAN,et al.  End-User Development: An Emerging Paradigm , 2006, End User Development.

[19]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[20]  Sara Jones,et al.  A Multi-Activity Distributed Participatory Design Process for St imulating Creativity in the Specification of Requirements for a Work-Integrated Learning System , 2008 .

[21]  Wolfgang Nejdl,et al.  Innovative Approaches for Learning and Knowledge Sharing, First European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2006, Crete, Greece, October 1-4, 2006, Proceedings , 2006, EC-TEL.