Control-Theoretic Utility Maximization in Multihop Wireless Networks Under Mission Dynamics

Both bandwidth and energy become important resource constraints when multihop wireless networks are used to transport high-data-rate traffic for a moderately long duration. In such networks, it is important to control the traffic rates to not only conform to the link capacity bounds, but also to ensure that the energy of battery-powered forwarding nodes is utilized judiciously to avoid premature exhaustion (i.e., the network lasts as long as the applications require data from the sources) without being unnecessarily conservative (i.e., ensuring that the applications derive the maximum utility possible). Unlike prior work that focuses on the instantaneous distributed optimization of such networks, we consider the more challenging question of how such optimal usage of both link capacity and node energy may be achieved over a time horizon. Our key contributions are twofold. We first show how the formalism of optimal control may be used to derive optimal resource usage strategies over a time horizon, under a variety of both deterministic and statistically uncertain variations in various parameters, such as the duration for which individual applications are active or the time-varying recharge characteristics of renewable energy sources (e.g., solar cell batteries). In parallel, we also demonstrate that these optimal adaptations can be embedded, with acceptably low signaling overhead, into a distributed, utility-based rate adaptation protocol. Simulation studies, based on a combination of synthetic and real data traces, validate the close-to-optimal performance characteristics of these practically realizable protocols.

[1]  Archan Misra,et al.  Utility-based bandwidth adaptation in mission-oriented wireless sensor networks , 2012, TOSN.

[2]  M. Petit Dynamic optimization. The calculus of variations and optimal control in economics and management : by Morton I. Kamien and Nancy L. Schwartz. Second Edition. North-Holland (Advanced Textbooks in Economics), Amsterdam and New York, 1991. Pp. xvii+377. ISBN0-444- 01609-0 , 1994 .

[3]  Daniel Pérez Palomar,et al.  A tutorial on decomposition methods for network utility maximization , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[4]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  Power management in energy harvesting sensor networks , 2007, TECS.

[5]  Brian S. Ferguson,et al.  Introduction to Dynamic Economic Models , 1998 .

[6]  Archan Misra,et al.  Control-theoretic Optimization of Utility over Mission Lifetimes in Multi-hop Wireless Networks , 2009, 2009 6th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[7]  Archan Misra,et al.  Adaptive In-Network Processing for Bandwidth and Energy Constrained Mission-Oriented Multihop Wireless Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[8]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Optimization flow control—I: basic algorithm and convergence , 1999, TNET.

[9]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[10]  Mung Chiang,et al.  Utility-Lifetime Trade-off in Self-regulating Wireless Sensor Networks: A Cross-Layer Design Approach , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[11]  R. Vidal Dynamic optimization: The calculus of variations and optimal control in economics and management: Morton I. KAMIEN and Nancy L. SCHWARTZ Volume 4 in: Dynamic Economics: Theory and Applications, North-Holland, New York, 1981, xi + 331 pages, Dfl.90.00 , 1982 .

[12]  Archan Misra,et al.  Utility-Based Adaptation in Mission-Oriented Wireless Sensor Networks , 2008, 2008 5th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[13]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  A Distributed Algorithm for Joint Sensing and Routing in Wireless Networks with Non-Steerable Directional Antennas , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols.