Localized Innovation and Productivity Growth in Asia: An Intertemporal DEA Approach

Recent contributions to growth theory stress the importance of localized innovation for the performance of more backward countries. In earlier papers, analyses by means of DEA techniques confirmed this intuition. In this paper, we extend this type of analysis by relaxing the macroeconomic viewpoint adopted until now. New databases on output, labor and capital input in the agricultural and manufacturing sectors are developed for 40 countries. Using intertemporal DEA, it is found that changes in the global production frontier are localized at high levels of capital intensity. This result is stronger in agriculture than in manufacturing. Further, a decomposition of labor productivity growth in eight Asian countries for the period 1975–1992 into the effects of capital intensification, learning and innovation is made. The results suggest that there is a particular development path in which increases in capital intensity appear to be a prerequisite to benefit from international technology spillovers.

[1]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  Total factor productivity, the east Asian miracle, and the world production frontier , 2000 .

[2]  Paul Krugman,et al.  The Myth of Asia's Miracle , 1994 .

[3]  Lawrence J. Lau,et al.  The Sources of Economic Growth of the East Asian Newly Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[4]  Marcel P. Timmer,et al.  The 'appropriate technology' explanation of productivity growth differentials: an empirical approach , 2005 .

[5]  José Manuel Pastor,et al.  Convergence in OECD countries: technical change, efficiency and productivity , 2000 .

[6]  Walter Diewert,et al.  Capital and the Theory of Productivity Measurement , 2016 .

[7]  Bert M. Balk,et al.  Industrial Price, Quantity, and Productivity Indices , 1998 .

[8]  Andrew B. Bernard,et al.  Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement across Industries and Countries , 2001 .

[9]  M. Timmer.  The dynamics of Asian manufacturing : a comparative perspective in the late twentieth century , 2000 .

[10]  Susanto Basu,et al.  Appropriate Technology and Growth , 1996 .

[11]  Y. Mundlak,et al.  A cross-country database for sector investment and capital , 2000 .

[12]  Ching-Cheng Chang,et al.  Efficiency change and growth in productivity: the Asian growth experience , 1999 .

[13]  Alwyn Young,et al.  The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience , 1994 .

[14]  Allen M. Featherstone,et al.  Productivity Growth in the Western Hemisphere (1978–94): The Caribbean in Perspective , 2002 .

[15]  R. Bartels,et al.  The Effect of Sample Size on the Mean Efficiency in DEA with an Application to Electricity Distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand , 1998 .

[16]  A. Atkinson,et al.  A New View of Technological Change , 1969 .

[17]  M. Timmer.  The Dynamics of Asian Manufacturing , 2000 .

[18]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[19]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[20]  D. Weil,et al.  A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth Author ( s ) : , 2008 .

[21]  Sergio Perelman,et al.  R&D, Technological Progress and Efficiency Change in Industrial Activities , 1995 .

[22]  R. R. Russell,et al.  Technological Change, Technological Catch-up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence , 2002 .

[23]  B. Balk,et al.  Industrial Price, Quantity, and Productivity Indices: The Micro-Economic Theory and an Application , 1998 .

[24]  T. Coelli,et al.  Catch-up and Convergence in Global Agricultural Productivity , 2004 .