Value-driven design of a high fidelity part task trainer for upper limb disorders

This paper presents a model-based systems engineering (MBSE) approach to develop an upper limb spasticity part-task trainer for therapy training and clinical education. We adopt a value-driven design proposed by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) with the combination of specification technique CONSENS™ proposed by Heinz Nixdorf Institute as a framework to guide the team to optimize the perceived system value and the development process. As early as during the conceptual design phase, the specified system models take into considerations the Voice of Customer, the Voice of Business and the Voice of Technology to meet customer expectations, ensure cost effectiveness and enabling new functionality. Following such an approach, clinicians, therapists and engineers work together in order to develop an upper limb disorder part-task trainer which requires knowledge of mechanics, electric/electronics, control technology, software engineering, biology and human anatomy. As an education tool, the part-task trainer can multiply the frequency of novice therapy training at clinical training centres, medical schools and hospitals.

[1]  Paul Collopy,et al.  Value-Driven Design , 2011 .

[2]  J S Rietman,et al.  Stop using the Ashworth Scale for the assessment of spasticity , 2009, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[3]  Takashi Komeda,et al.  Emulation of Spasticity Symptoms in Upper Limb Part-Task Trainer for Physiotherapist Education , 2013 .

[4]  H. Barrows Simulated patients in medical teaching. , 1968, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[5]  Rainer Koch,et al.  Reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: a comparison study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[6]  H Rodgers,et al.  A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[7]  Mindy F. Levin,et al.  On the nature and measurement of spasticity , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  Jürgen Gausemeier,et al.  Design Methodology for Intelligent Technical Systems, Develop Intelligent Technical Systems of the Future , 2014, Design Methodology for Intelligent Technical Systems.

[9]  Takashi Komeda,et al.  Evaluation of Upper Limb Spasticity towards the Development of a High Fidelity Part-task Trainer☆ , 2014 .

[10]  D. Shaffer,et al.  “Practicing” Medicine without Risk: Students' and Educators' Responses to High-fidelity Patient Simulation , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  Cheng Yee Low,et al.  Specifying the Principle Solution in Mechatronic Development Enterprises , 2008, 2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[12]  Takashi Komeda,et al.  A Questionnaire-Based Survey: Therapist’s Response towards the Upper Limb Disorder Learning Tool , 2014 .

[13]  A. Ziv,et al.  Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. , 2006, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[14]  Takashi Komeda,et al.  Emulation of muscle tone of upper limb spasticity and rigidity , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[15]  G. Jull,et al.  High-fidelity patient simulation in physiotherapy education. , 2007, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[16]  F. J. de Ana,et al.  Value Driven Innovation in Medical Device Design: A Process for Balancing Stakeholder Voices , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Y. Kawakami,et al.  Basic Research on the Upper Limb Patient Simulator , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[18]  Takashi Komeda,et al.  Design of Upper Limb Patient Simulator , 2012 .