Levels of Detail in Descriptions and Depictions of Geographic Space

ABSTRACT When navigating, people often rely upon a variety of geographic information sources to guide them to their destinations. These include maps, descriptions, or a combination of these as displayed traditionally on paper or through high-tech (handheld and in-vehicle) navigation devices. Maps provide a graphic representation of an environment and can vary in level of spatial (e.g., granularity) and labeling (e.g., label addition/removal) details. Likewise, written descriptions of an environment also vary in their levels of spatial (e.g., inclusion or exclusion of spatial information) and labeling (e.g., label addition/removal) detail. Importantly, experience within and memory for an environment may change as a function of these variations. The present experiments examine the interactions of spatial and labeling detail in generating and using mental representations of college campuses. The results of four experiments demonstrate that reducing spatial details through graphic generalization can increase memory for verbally presented information. Results additionally demonstrate the importance of balancing spatial and verbal detail in maps and descriptions in correspondence with human working memory constraints. Accordingly, we present a limited model of appropriate spatial and verbal generalization strategies, with particular regard to implementation in geographical positioning devices.

[1]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Extended experience benefits spatial mental model development with route but not survey descriptions. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[2]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[3]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[4]  Martin Tomko,et al.  Identification of the Initial Entity in Granular Route Directions , 2006 .

[5]  R. Mayer Systematic Thinking Fostered by Illustrations in Scientific Text , 1989 .

[6]  Michael F. Worboys,et al.  Imprecision in Finite Resolution Spatial Data , 1998, GeoInformatica.

[7]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[8]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Making graphics physically tangible , 1999, CACM.

[9]  Andrew U. Frank Pragmatic Information Content‚ÄîHow to Measure the Information in a Route Description , 2003, Foundations of Geographic Information Science.

[10]  David Florence,et al.  Human Performance Evaluation of Alternative Graphic Display Symbologies , 1986 .

[11]  Michael F. Worboys,et al.  Event‐oriented approaches to geographic phenomena , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  R A Chechile,et al.  Incongruous item generation effects: a multiple-cue perspective. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  William Allen,et al.  Instructional media research: Past, present, and future , 1971 .

[14]  Karen Spärck Jones Automatic summarising: factors and directions , 1998, ArXiv.

[15]  Robert B McMaster,et al.  Generalization in Digital Cartography , 2008 .

[16]  Holly A. Taylor,et al.  How do you get there from here? Mental representations of route descriptions , 1999 .

[17]  J. Jonides,et al.  Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. , 1999, Science.

[18]  Alexander Klippel,et al.  Geographic event conceptualization , 2006, Cognitive Processing.

[19]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[20]  T. Blaxton Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. , 1989 .

[21]  Holly A. Taylorandbarbaratversky Spatial Mental Models Derived from Survey and Route Descriptions , 1992 .

[22]  H. Taylor,et al.  Goal-specific influences on the representation of spatial perspective , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[23]  J. Peeck,et al.  Chapter 17 Enhancing Graphic-Effects in Instructional Texts: Influencing Learning Activities , 1994 .

[24]  M. Worboys Computation with imprecise geospatial data , 1998 .

[25]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  The efficiency of multimodal interaction: a case study , 1998, ICSLP.

[26]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Working memory in developing and applying mental models from spatial descriptions , 2008 .

[27]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[28]  Chris Stolte,et al.  Rendering effective route maps: improving usability through generalization , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[29]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The mental representation of knowledge acquired from maps. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Matt J. Rossano,et al.  The process of learning from small-scale maps , 1994 .

[31]  R. McMaster,et al.  Map Generalization: Making Rules for Knowledge Representation , 1991 .

[32]  John G. Stell,et al.  Stratified Map Spaces: A Formal Basis for Multi-resolution Spatial Databases , 2001 .

[33]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[34]  Valérie Gyselinck,et al.  The role of illustrations in text comprehension: What, when, for whom, and why? , 1999 .

[35]  L. R. Novick,et al.  Folding a fish, making a mushroom: The role of diagrams in executing assembly procedures , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[36]  G. Allen Principles and practices for communicating route knowledge , 2000 .

[37]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[38]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Learning Procedures: The Role of Working Memory in Multimedia Learning Experiences , 2022 .

[39]  D. Stone,et al.  How Do Young Adults Read Directions with and without Pictures , 1981 .

[40]  C. Linde,et al.  Spatial Networks as a Site for the Study of Language and Thought. , 1975 .

[41]  R. Mayer,et al.  A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text , 1995 .

[42]  Edward Rolf Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1985 .

[43]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[44]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Propositional and situational representations of text , 1985 .

[45]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  The ‘Egg-Yolk’ Representation of Regions with Indeterminate Boundaries , 2020 .

[46]  A. Baddeley Exploring the Central Executive , 1996 .

[47]  W. Howard Levie,et al.  Effects of text illustrations: A review of research , 1982 .

[48]  Joseph Shimron Learning Positional Information from Maps , 1978 .

[49]  T. McNamara,et al.  Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Ten myths of multimodal interaction , 1999, Commun. ACM.

[51]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[52]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[53]  C. S. White,et al.  Effects of 'Seductive Details' on Macroprocessing and Microprocessing in Adults and Children , 1989 .

[54]  Joan K. Gallini,et al.  When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1990 .

[55]  M. Denis,et al.  The production of route directions: investigating conditions that favour conciseness in spatial discourse , 2004 .

[56]  Robert Weibel,et al.  GIS and generalization: methodology and practice. , 1995 .

[57]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  The mental representation of spatial descriptions , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[58]  B Tversky,et al.  Descriptions and depictions of environments , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[59]  Eliseo Clementini,et al.  A spatial model for complex objects with a broad boundary supporting queries on uncertain data , 2001, Data Knowl. Eng..

[60]  G. Logan Executive control of thought and action , 1985 .

[61]  Feller William,et al.  An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications , 1950 .

[62]  Valérie Gyselinck,et al.  Visuospatial memory and phonological loop in learning from multimedia , 2002 .

[63]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  How Maps Work - Representation, Visualization, and Design , 1995 .

[64]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Managing Cognitive Load--Recent Trends in Cognitive Load Theory. Commentary. , 2002 .

[65]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models☆ , 1992 .

[66]  Elizabeth D. Liddy,et al.  Advances in Automatic Text Summarization , 2001, Information Retrieval.

[67]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Scale in a digital geographic world , 1997 .