Economic analysis of immunoadsorption systems

Immunoadsorption possesses an attractive combination of selectivity and yield, and in some cases may replace many conventional purification steps with a single step. The economic performance of immunoadsorption is dependent on apparatus configuration (e.g. Sepharose(R) bed, perfusive bed and membrane.), operating conditions (e.g. bed depth, flow rate and concentration of adsorbate in the effluent at break-through) and antibody binding kinetics. The solution space for the lowest operating cost is potentially very large and is prohibitive to exhaustively investigate in the laboratory. A mathematical model of a generic immunoadsorption process is useful in identifying the most promising configurations, operating conditions and antibodies, without having to resort to experiments that explore every possibility. The model system was chosen to represent the purification of a valuable biochemical product (1000 mg) from mammalian cell culture media or milk where the protein is present at low concentration (2 mg l(-1)). The antigen-antibody kinetic rate constants for a bovine serum albumin-monoclonal antibody system are available in the literature and were representative for this study. A modified chromatographic model was developed to predict the dimensionless operating cost of the generic immunoadsorption system subject to different apparatus configurations, operating conditions and antibody kinetics. Optimal operating conditions for each of the three configurations were identified. Under these conditions, the operating costs for a perfusive bed and a membrane were comparable and 28% lower than for a packed bed. The antibody binding kinetics significantly affected the dimensionless operating cost of the system and, therefore, the model can help select the most suitable antibody from a panel of prospective antibodies. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Henry C. Thomas,et al.  Heterogeneous Ion Exchange in a Flowing System , 1944 .

[2]  A. Liapis,et al.  Modelling and analysis of the elution stage of perfusion chromatography. Effects of intraparticle convective velocity and microsphere size on system performance , 1996 .

[3]  M. Yarmush,et al.  Elution Conditions and Degradation Mechanisms in Long‐Term Immunoadsorbent Use , 1991, Biotechnology progress.

[4]  C. J. King,et al.  Axial dispersion in liquid flow through packed beds , 1966 .

[5]  S. Goldstein On the mathematics of exchange processes in fixed columns I. Mathematical solutions and asymptotic expansions , 1953, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  F. Arnold,et al.  Analytical affinity chromatography. II. Rate theory and the measurement of biological binding kinetics. , 1986, Journal of chromatography.

[7]  H. A. Chase,et al.  Modeling the affinity adsorption of immunoglobulin G to protein A immobilised to agarose matrices , 1989 .

[8]  S. Suen,et al.  A mathematical analysis of affinity membrane bioseparations , 1992 .

[9]  Frances H. Arnold,et al.  Analysis of affinity separations: I: Predicting the performance of affinity adsorbers , 1985 .

[10]  M. Etzel,et al.  Mass transfer limitations in protein separations using ion-exchange membranes. , 1996, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  Z. Su,et al.  Protein A immunoaffinity hollow fiber membranes for immunoglobulin G purification: experimental characterization. , 1995, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  R. G. Rice,et al.  On the prediction of ultimate separation in parametric pumps , 1975 .

[13]  Y. Sano,et al.  Short-cut method for predicting the productivity of affinity chromatography. , 1992, Journal of chromatography.

[14]  F. Regnier,et al.  Flow-through particles for the high-performance liquid chromatographic separation of biomolecules: perfusion chromatography. , 1990, Journal of chromatography.

[15]  P. Bailon,et al.  Efficient recovery of recombinant proteins using membrane‐based immunoaffinity chromatography (MIC) , 1992, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  A. Liapis,et al.  Biospecific adsorption in fixed and periodic countercurrent beds , 1988, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  A. Liapis,et al.  Theory of perfusion chromatography , 1992 .

[18]  F. Arnold,et al.  Analysis of affinity separations II: The characterization of affinity columns by pulse techniques , 1985 .

[19]  S. Zale,et al.  Membrane-Based Affinity Technology for Commercial Scale Purifications , 1988, Bio/Technology.

[20]  H. Chase Affinity separations utilising immobilised monoclonal antibodies—a new tool for the biochemical engineer , 1984 .

[21]  A Sadana,et al.  Efficiency and economics of bioseparation: some case studies. , 1994, Bioseparation.

[22]  J. Fried,et al.  Breakthrough of lysozyme through an affinity membrane of cellulose‐cibacron blue , 1994 .

[23]  A. Middelberg The influence of protein refolding strategy on cost for competing reactions , 1996 .

[24]  M L Yarmush,et al.  Dissociation kinetics of antigen-antibody interactions: studies on a panel of anti-albumin monoclonal antibodies. , 1989, Molecular immunology.

[25]  H. Chase,et al.  Prediction of the performance of preparative affinity chromatography. , 1984, Journal of chromatography.

[26]  Amitava Mukherjee,et al.  Mathematical Simulation of Bioseparation in an Affinity Packed Column , 1994 .