Wound image evaluation with machine learning

A pressure ulcer is a clinical pathology of localized damage to the skin and underlying tissue caused by pressure, shear or friction. Diagnosis, care and treatment of pressure ulcers can result in extremely expensive costs for health systems. A reliable diagnosis supported by precise wound evaluation is crucial in order to succeed on the treatment decision and, in some cases, to save the patient?s life. However, current clinical evaluation procedures, focused mainly on visual inspection, do not seem to be accurate enough to accomplish this important task. This paper presents a computer-vision approach based on image processing algorithms and supervised learning techniques to help detect and classify wound tissue types that play an important role in wound diagnosis. The system proposed involves the use of the k-means clustering algorithm for image segmentation and compares three different machine learning approaches-neural networks, support vector machines and random forest decision trees-to classify effectively each segmented region as the appropriate tissue type. Feature selection based on a wrapper approach with recursive feature elimination is shown to be effective in keeping the efficacy of the classifiers up and significantly reducing the number of necessary predictors. Results obtained show high performance rates from classifiers based on fitted neural networks, random forest models and support vector machines (overall accuracy on a testing set 95% CI], respectively: 81.87% 80.03%, 83.61%]; 87.37% 85.76%, 88.86%]; 88.08% 86.51%, 89.53%]), with significant differences found between the three machine learning approaches. This study seeks to provide, using standard classification algorithms, a consistent and robust methodological framework as a basis for the development of reliable computational systems to support ulcer diagnosis.

[1]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[2]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Irrelevant Features and the Subset Selection Problem , 1994, ICML.

[3]  C. Smith Diagnostic tests (1) – sensitivity and specificity , 2012, Phlebology.

[4]  Laura E Edsberg Pressure ulcer tissue histology: an appraisal of current knowledge. , 2007, Ostomy/wound management.

[5]  Geoffrey J McLachlan,et al.  Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Héctor Mesa,et al.  Binary Tissue Classification on Wound Images With Neural Networks and Bayesian Classifiers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  B. Bates-Jensen,et al.  Wound care: a collaborative practice manual for physical therapists and nurses Carrie Sussman Barbara Bates-Jensen Aspen £58 256pp 0-8342-0748-6 0834207486. , 1999, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[8]  Hazem Wannous,et al.  Robust tissue classification for reproducible wound assessment in telemedicine environments , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[9]  C. Langlotz Fundamental measures of diagnostic examination performance: usefulness for clinical decision making and research. , 2003, Radiology.

[10]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[11]  Dimitris A. Karras,et al.  Computer-aided tumor detection in endoscopic video using color wavelet features , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[12]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[13]  M. Brock,et al.  The use of “overall accuracy” to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests , 2004, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity , 1994 .

[15]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[16]  Y. J. Zhang,et al.  A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[17]  Lena Gunningberg,et al.  EPUAP classification system for pressure ulcers: European reliability study. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[18]  Tim D. Jones,et al.  An active contour model for measuring the area of leg ulcers , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  S. Treuillet,et al.  Supervised Tissue Classification from Color Images for a Complete Wound Assessment Tool , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  Adilson Gonzaga,et al.  Segmentation and analysis of leg ulcers color images , 2001, Proceedings International Workshop on Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality.

[21]  Martin D. Levine,et al.  Dynamic Measurement of Computer Generated Image Segmentations , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[22]  Max Kuhn,et al.  Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package , 2008 .

[23]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values , 1994, BMJ.

[24]  Héctor Mesa,et al.  A hybrid learning approach to tissue recognition in wound images , 2009, Int. J. Intell. Comput. Cybern..

[25]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[26]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks , 1995 .

[27]  D. Kosmopoulos,et al.  Automated Pressure Ulcer Lesion Diagnosis for Telemedicine Systems , 2007, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[28]  Ting Wang,et al.  Application of Breiman's Random Forest to Modeling Structure-Activity Relationships of Pharmaceutical Molecules , 2004, Multiple Classifier Systems.

[29]  C. Oomens,et al.  The Relative Contributions of Compression and Hypoxia to Development of Muscle Tissue Damage: An In Vitro Study , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  Begoña Acha,et al.  A computer assisted diagnosis tool for the classification of burns by depth of injury. , 2005, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[31]  Kristin J. Dana,et al.  Skin Texture Modeling , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[32]  Huiru Zheng,et al.  Case-based tissue classification for monitoring leg ulcer healing , 2005, 18th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS'05).

[33]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  kernlab - An S4 Package for Kernel Methods in R , 2004 .

[34]  Purushottam W. Laud,et al.  Diagnostic tests , 2020, Bayesian Thinking in Biostatistics.

[35]  José Manuel Benítez,et al.  Neural Networks in R Using the Stuttgart Neural Network Simulator: RSNNS , 2012 .

[36]  B Belem Non-invasive wound assessment by image analysis. , 2004 .

[37]  G. Onder,et al.  Pressure ulcer and mortality in frail elderly people living in community. , 2007, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[38]  T. Nakatsuka,et al.  Analysis of ischemia‐reperfusion injury in a microcirculatory model of pressure ulcers , 2005, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[39]  Marinos Elia,et al.  Disease-related Malnutrition: An Evidence-based Approach to Treatment , 2003 .

[40]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[41]  Max Kuhn,et al.  Applied Predictive Modeling , 2013 .

[42]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[43]  Hazem Wannous,et al.  Enhanced Assessment of the Wound-Healing Process by Accurate Multiview Tissue Classification , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[44]  M. Gevrey,et al.  Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models , 2003 .