A recipe to control the first wave of COVID-19: More or less democracy?

PurposeThis research aims to study some national government success factors at controlling the first wave of COVID-19. The author placed special attention on democracy-related factors.Design/methodology/approachA sample of 156 countries were studied during the first half of 2020 and their government effectiveness was analyzed regarding six dependent variables, namely, the government’s daily average of stringency index, the outbreak response time, the daily average of cases and deaths per million, the daily average of tests per thousand and the mortality rate.FindingsThe study finds that countries with the highest democracy indexes applied the softest social constraints measured by the daily average stringency index. These countries suffered a more severe pandemic impact confirmed by the highest daily averages of cases and deaths per million and the highest mortality rate. Similarly, these countries exhibited the shortest outbreak response time and the most extensive daily average tests per thousand.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitations of this study include lack of universal consensus for the dependent variables’ definitions, inconsistencies in how countries record COVID-19 deaths, differences in testing efforts, variances on health services, unreliable data from less democratic countries and so on.Originality/valueTo the best of the author’s knowledge, no previous research paper has studied the explanatory power of the author selected government success factors at controlling the first wave of COVID-19, which constitutes this study’s original contribution.

[1]  Giray Gozgor Global Evidence on the Determinants of Public Trust in Governments during the COVID-19 , 2021, Applied Research in Quality of Life.

[2]  D. Valev,et al.  Relationships of total COVID-19 cases and deaths with ten demographic, economic and social indicators , 2020, medRxiv.

[3]  M. Nevitt Domestic Military Operations and the Coronavirus Pandemic , 2020 .

[4]  S. Wong,et al.  The potential impact of previous exposure to SARS or MERS on control of the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[5]  D. Noonan,et al.  COVID-19 and Obesity: Dangerous Liaisons , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[6]  Yasutaka Hasegawa,et al.  BCG Vaccination and Mortality of COVID-19 across 173 Countries: An Ecological Study , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[7]  Philipp Trein The Paradox of Prevention: Authoritarian Past and Liberal Democracy in Times of Crisis , 2020 .

[8]  Orhan Erdem Freedom and stock market performance during Covid-19 outbreak , 2020, Finance Research Letters.

[9]  R. Mazzucchelli,et al.  [Democracy and Covid-19 mortality in Europe.] , 2020, Revista espanola de salud publica.

[10]  M. M. Pillado,et al.  Efectividad del plan de contingencia de la Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal ante la infección de Covid-19. , 2020 .

[11]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Global trends in coronavirus research at the time of Covid-19: A general bibliometric approach and content analysis using SciMAT , 2020, El Profesional de la Información.

[12]  I. Alon,et al.  Regime Type and COVID-19 Response , 2020, FIIB Business Review.

[13]  R. Lanius,et al.  Going to “War”: Military Approach as the Antidote to Defeating COVID-19 , 2020, Military Behavioral Health.

[14]  Ryan Miller,et al.  Transmission and risk factors of OF COVID-19. , 2020, Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine.

[15]  G. López-García Vigilar y castigar: el papel de militares, policías y guardias civiles en la comunicación de la crisis del Covid-19 en España , 2020 .

[16]  Badar Nadeem Ashraf Devastation Caused by COVID-19: Is Democracy to Blame? , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  M. Dorsch,et al.  Political regimes and deaths in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice.

[18]  D. Naumann,et al.  Mission command: applying principles of military leadership to the SARS-Cov-2 (covid-19) crisis , 2020, BMJ military health.

[19]  M. Sahimi,et al.  How do environmental, economic and health factors influence regional vulnerability to COVID-19? , 2020, medRxiv.

[20]  M. Majumder,et al.  Democracy and Mobility: A Preliminary Analysis of Global Adherence to Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions for COVID-19. , 2020, SSRN.

[21]  Albert Falcó-Gimeno,et al.  Pandemics meet democracy. Experimental evidence from the COVID-19 crisis in Spain , 2020 .

[22]  Andrew J. Sauer,et al.  COVID-19 Pandemic and Cardiovascular Disease , 2020, US Cardiology Review.

[23]  COVID-19 and the US military , 2020 .

[24]  C. S. Wong,et al.  Mobilizing civil society for the HIV treatment cascade: a global analysis on democracy and its association with people living with HIV who know their status , 2019, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[25]  N. Shortland,et al.  Military (in)decision-making process: a psychological framework to examine decision inertia in military operations , 2018, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.

[26]  V. Bove,et al.  The demand for military expenditure in authoritarian regimes , 2016 .

[27]  Khai Hoan Tram,et al.  Gender inequality and HIV transmission: a global analysis , 2014, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[28]  M. Wahman,et al.  Authoritarian regime types revisited: updated data in comparative perspective , 2013 .

[29]  J. Schwartz Compensating for the ‘Authoritarian Advantage’ in Crisis Response: A Comparative Case Study of SARS Pandemic Responses in China and Taiwan , 2012, Journal of Chinese Political Science.

[30]  P. Narayan,et al.  Does democracy facilitate economic growth or does economic growth facilitate democracy? An empirical study of Sub-Saharan Africa , 2011 .

[31]  Digital Library Adoption and the Technology Acceptance Model: A Cross-Country Analysis , 2010, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..