Next-generation dynamic global vegetation models: learning from community ecology.

Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) are powerful tools to project past, current and future vegetation patterns and associated biogeochemical cycles. However, most models are limited by how they define vegetation and by their simplistic representation of competition. We discuss how concepts from community assembly theory and coexistence theory can help to improve vegetation models. We further present a trait- and individual-based vegetation model (aDGVM2) that allows individual plants to adopt a unique combination of trait values. These traits define how individual plants grow and compete. A genetic optimization algorithm is used to simulate trait inheritance and reproductive isolation between individuals. These model properties allow the assembly of plant communities that are adapted to a site's biotic and abiotic conditions. The aDGVM2 simulates how environmental conditions influence the trait spectra of plant communities; that fire selects for traits that enhance fire protection and reduces trait diversity; and the emergence of life-history strategies that are suggestive of colonization-competition trade-offs. The aDGVM2 deals with functional diversity and competition fundamentally differently from current DGVMs. This approach may yield novel insights as to how vegetation may respond to climate change and we believe it could foster collaborations between functional plant biologists and vegetation modellers.

[1]  Darren T. Drewry,et al.  The Jena Diversity-Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (JeDi-DGVM): a diverse approach to representing t , 2012 .

[2]  Simon Scheiter,et al.  The stability of African savannas: insights from the indirect estimation of the parameters of a dynamic model. , 2010, Ecology.

[3]  S. Díaz,et al.  Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change , 1997 .

[4]  Guy F. Midgley,et al.  Carbon dioxide and the uneasy interactions of trees and savannah grasses , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .

[6]  R. Law.  Optimal Life Histories Under Age-Specific Predation , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[8]  Jens Kattge,et al.  Will the tropical land biosphere dominate the climate–carbon cycle feedback during the twenty-first century? , 2007 .

[9]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  A global distribution of biodiversity inferred from climatic constraints: results from a process‐based modelling study , 2000 .

[10]  Alan K. Knapp,et al.  Controls of Aboveground Net Primary Production in Mesic Savanna Grasslands: An Inter-Hemispheric Comparison , 2009, Ecosystems.

[11]  T. Mcnelley,et al.  Temperature dependence of , 1993, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[12]  James S. Clark,et al.  A future for models and data in environmental science. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  Simon Scheiter,et al.  Fire and fire-adapted vegetation promoted C4 expansion in the late Miocene. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[14]  B. Enquist.  Universal scaling in tree and vascular plant allometry: toward a general quantitative theory linking plant form and function from cells to ecosystems. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[15]  D. A. King,et al.  What controls tropical forest architecture: testing environmental, structural and floristic drivers , 2012 .

[16]  James S. Clark,et al.  FECUNDITY OF TREES AND THE COLONIZATION–COMPETITION HYPOTHESIS , 2004 .

[17]  Yao Xue-han.  Evaluation of ecosystem services of Jixi , 2012 .

[18]  Jennifer A Hoeting,et al.  A structured and dynamic framework to advance traits-based theory and prediction in ecology. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[19]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology , 1992 .

[20]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Towards quantifying uncertainty in predictions of Amazon ‘dieback’ , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  S. Higgins,et al.  TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[22]  S. Higgins,et al.  Temperature dependence of the reproduction niche and its relevance for plant species distributions , 2012 .

[23]  C. Peng,et al.  Toward dynamic global vegetation models for simulating vegetation–climate interactions and feedbacks: recent developments, limitations, and future challenges , 2010 .

[24]  Thomas Giesecke,et al.  Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model , 2012 .

[25]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes , 2005 .

[26]  Michael B. McElroy,et al.  The global distribution of O3 on mars , 1977 .

[27]  James S. Clark,et al.  Climate change vulnerability of forest biodiversity: climate and competition tracking of demographic rates , 2011 .

[28]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  High‐dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence , 2010 .

[29]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  R. Betts,et al.  Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model , 2000, Nature.

[31]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Botanical Scaling. (Book Reviews: Plant Allometry. The Scaling of Form and Process.) , 1994 .

[32]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Multiple mechanisms of Amazonian forest biomass losses in three dynamic global vegetation models under climate change. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[33]  M. Ohlson,et al.  Invasion of Norway spruce diversifies the fire regime in boreal European forests , 2011 .

[34]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Functional tradeoffs determine species coexistence via the storage effect , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Richard E. Glor,et al.  Niche lability in the evolution of a Caribbean lizard community , 2003, Nature.

[36]  S. Higgins,et al.  How many elephants can you fit into a conservation area , 2012 .

[37]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly rules, null models, and trait dispersion : new questions from old patterns , 1995 .

[38]  B. Shipley.  From Plant Traits to Vegetation Structure: Chance and Selection in the Assembly of Ecological Communities , 2009 .

[39]  G. Boer,et al.  Simulating Competition and Coexistence between Plant Functional Types in a Dynamic Vegetation Model , 2006 .

[40]  Sebastian Schmidtlein,et al.  The role of climate and plant functional trade-offs in shaping global biome and biodiversity patterns , 2011 .

[41]  F. Woodward,et al.  Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models , 2001 .

[42]  C. Müller,et al.  Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance , 2007 .

[43]  R. Pennington,et al.  Recent assembly of the Cerrado, a neotropical plant diversity hotspot, by in situ evolution of adaptations to fire , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  F. Woodward,et al.  Assessing uncertainties in a second-generation dynamic vegetation model caused by ecological scale limitations. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[45]  F. Woodward,et al.  The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[46]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model , 2003 .

[47]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  Juli G Pausas,et al.  Fire reduces morphospace occupation in plant communities. , 2008, Ecology.

[49]  S. Higgins,et al.  Impacts of climate change on the vegetation of Africa: an adaptive dynamic vegetation modelling approach , 2009 .

[50]  Victor Brovkin,et al.  Global biogeophysical interactions between forest and climate , 2009 .

[51]  Sandy P. Harrison,et al.  The influence of vegetation, fire spread and fire behaviour on biomass burning and trace gas emissions: results from a process-based model , 2010 .

[52]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Niche evolution and adaptive radiation: testing the order of trait divergence. , 2006, Ecology.

[53]  Jarrett E. K. Byrnes,et al.  A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change , 2012, Nature.

[54]  K. McConway,et al.  Absence of phylogenetic signal in the niche structure of meadow plant communities , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  P. Klinkhamer.  Plant allometry: The scaling of form and process , 1995 .

[56]  Jon E. Keeley,et al.  PLANT FUNCTIONAL TRAITS IN RELATION TO FIRE IN CROWN-FIRE ECOSYSTEMS , 2004 .

[57]  J. Fjeldså,et al.  The partitioning of Africa: statistically defined biogeographical regions in sub‐Saharan Africa , 2012 .

[58]  I. Prentice,et al.  Global vegetation and terrestrial carbon cycle changes after the last ice age. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[59]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[60]  P. Keddy,et al.  The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities , 1995 .

[61]  Peter M. Cox,et al.  Description of the "TRIFFID" Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2001 .

[62]  Jean Clobert,et al.  Alternative fire resistance strategies in savanna trees , 1997, Oecologia.

[63]  M. Pärtel,et al.  Ecological assembly rules in plant communities—approaches, patterns and prospects , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[64]  Maria A. Gandolfo,et al.  Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale , 2009, Nature.

[65]  J Norberg,et al.  Phenotypic diversity and ecosystem functioning in changing environments: A theoretical framework , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  N. Swenson,et al.  Plant geography upon the basis of functional traits: an example from eastern North American trees. , 2010, Ecology.

[67]  T. Kira,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : II. FURTHER EVIDENCE OF THE THEORY AND ITS APPLICATION IN FOREST ECOLOGY , 1964 .

[68]  Hanns-Christof Spatz,et al.  Worldwide correlations of mechanical properties and green wood density. , 2010, American journal of botany.

[69]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  BIOME3: An equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types , 1996 .

[70]  P. Cooper,et al.  Projecting the Future , 1999 .

[71]  Simon L Lewis,et al.  Drought-induced shifts in the floristic and functional composition of tropical forests in Ghana. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[72]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) , 2008 .

[73]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[74]  R. Betts,et al.  Amazonian forest dieback under climate-carbon cycle projections for the 21st century , 2004 .

[75]  Jung‐Eun Lee,et al.  An exceptional role for flowering plant physiology in the expansion of tropical rainforests and biodiversity , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[76]  A. G. Valk,et al.  Succession in Wetlands: A Gleasonian Appraoch , 1981 .

[77]  J. Lawton,et al.  Organisms as ecosystem engineers , 1994 .

[78]  Mark Westoby,et al.  Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[79]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[80]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Connecting dynamic vegetation models to data – an inverse perspective , 2012 .

[81]  S. Zaehle,et al.  Robust dynamics of Amazon dieback to climate change with perturbed ecosystem model parameters , 2010 .

[82]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space , 2008 .

[83]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Coexistence Mediated by Recruitment Fluctuations: A Field Guide to the Storage Effect , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[84]  Kai Zhu,et al.  Individual-scale variation, species-scale differences: inference needed to understand diversity. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[85]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Dynamic global vegetation modelling: quantifying terrestrial ecosystem responses to large-scale environmental change , 2007 .

[86]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  C4 photosynthesis, atmospheric CO2, and climate , 1997, Oecologia.

[87]  R. Freckleton,et al.  On detecting and measuring competition in spatially structured plant communities , 2000 .

[88]  G. Bonan.  Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[89]  T. Kira,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : I.BASIC ANALYSES , 1964 .

[90]  V. Radeloff,et al.  Reconstructing range dynamics and range fragmentation of European bison for the last 8000 years , 2012 .

[91]  S. Higgins,et al.  Atmospheric CO2 forces abrupt vegetation shifts locally, but not globally , 2012, Nature.

[92]  M. Lechowicz,et al.  A holistic tree seedling model for the investigation of functional trait diversity , 2006 .

[93]  P. Reich,et al.  Fundamental trade-offs generating the worldwide leaf economics spectrum. , 2006, Ecology.

[94]  J. Chave,et al.  Towards a Worldwide Wood Economics Spectrum 2 . L E a D I N G D I M E N S I O N S I N W O O D F U N C T I O N , 2022 .

[95]  William M. Schaffer,et al.  Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities , 1989 .