Radiation Dose Reduction During EVAR: Results from a Prospective Multicentre Study (The REVAR Study).

OBJECTIVE To evaluate radiation exposure in standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using intra-operative guidance with pre-operative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) fusion and strict ALARA guidelines in a modern hybrid room. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between February and November 2016, consecutive patients with AAA undergoing EVAR with a bifurcated device in a hybrid room under fusion imaging guidance were prospectively enrolled in six aortic centres from the United States (n = 1), Europe (n = 4), and Japan (n = 1). Demographic data including body mass index (BMI), indirect dose area product (DAP), cumulative air kerma (CAK), variables influencing dose delivery, and contrast media volume were collected. RESULTS 85 patients (90.4% males) were included. The median age was 75 (IQR 69-81), with a median BMI of 27.4 (IQR 24.7-30.6). Median DAP and CAK were 14.7 (IQR 10.0-27.7) Gy·cm2 and 107 (IQR 68.0-189.0) mGy, respectively. The median contrast volume was 47 mL (IQR 35-70) (equivalent to 14.1g of iodine [IQR 10.5-21.0]). Median DAP per centre was 28.1 (n = 16, IQR 12.6-47.1), 15.9 (n = 11, IQR 11.9-22.5), 14.2 (n = 12, IQR 10.9-25.7), 20.2 (n = 18, IQR 7.0-39.5), 10.3 (n = 27, IQR 8.2-14.7) and 26.5 (n = 1) Gy·cm2. In multivariable analysis, collimation was the only factor that was significantly associated with DAP reduction, (coefficient = -0.014 per percentage of collimation, 95% CI -0.019 to -0.008, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS With adherence to the ALARA principle and routine application of fusion imaging guidance for EVAR, low radiation exposure compared with the published literature can be achieved in a real world setting.

[1]  M. V. van Strijen,et al.  Pros and Cons of 3D Image Fusion in Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2017, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[2]  M. Dijkstra,et al.  Intraoperative C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in fenestrated/branched aortic endografting. , 2011, Journal of vascular surgery.

[3]  T. Huber,et al.  Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. , 2015, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  A. Luciani,et al.  Image guidance for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional angiography and image fusion. , 2013, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[5]  M. Thompson,et al.  Intra-operative dynaCT in visceral-hybrid repair of an extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[6]  J. Wildberger,et al.  Occupational Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Aortic Repair , 2015, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[7]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Meta-analysis of Cumulative Radiation Duration and Dose During EVAR Using Mobile, Fixed, or Fixed/3D Fusion C-Arms , 2016, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[8]  M. Midulla,et al.  Evaluation of radiation during EVAR performed on a mobile C-arm. , 2012, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[9]  A. Carriero,et al.  The impact of radiological equipment on patient radiation exposure during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair , 2012, European Radiology.

[10]  B. Sonesson,et al.  The effects of combining fusion imaging, low-frequency pulsed fluoroscopy, and low-concentration contrast agent during endovascular aneurysm repair. , 2016, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  Bradford J. Wood,et al.  Multimodality Image Fusion–Guided Procedures: Technique, Accuracy, and Applications , 2012, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[12]  Richard Solomon,et al.  Contrast Media and Nephropathy: Findings From Systematic Analysis and Food and Drug Administration Reports of Adverse Effects , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[13]  P. Parizel,et al.  Benchmarking adult CT-dose levels to regional and national references using a dose-tracking software: a multicentre experience , 2017, Insights into Imaging.

[14]  D. Weishaupt,et al.  Improving Patient Safety: Implementing Dose Monitoring Software in Fluoroscopically Guided Interventions. , 2015, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[15]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  T. Carrell,et al.  Editor's choice--Angulation of the C-arm during complex endovascular aortic procedures increases radiation exposure to the head. , 2015, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[17]  L Desponds,et al.  Editor's Choice - Minimizing Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Procedures: Basic Knowledge, Literature Review, and Reporting Standards. , 2015, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[18]  Ariel Roguin,et al.  Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  M. Eagleton,et al.  Intraprocedural imaging: flat panel detectors, rotational angiography, FluoroCT, IVUS, or still the portable C-arm? , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[20]  A. Hertault,et al.  A Multicenter Survey of Endovascular Theatre Equipment and Radiation Exposure in France during Iliac Procedures. , 2017, Annals of vascular surgery.

[21]  M. Midulla,et al.  Impact of hybrid rooms with image fusion on radiation exposure during endovascular aortic repair. , 2014, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[22]  Daniel E. Kendrick,et al.  Comparative occupational radiation exposure between fixed and mobile imaging systems. , 2016, Journal of vascular surgery.

[23]  M. Iafrati,et al.  Minimizing radiation exposure to the vascular surgeon. , 2012, Journal of vascular surgery.