Using a voting system in conjunction with interactive whiteboard technology to enhance learning in the English language classroom

This study discusses the pedagogical potential of an interactive voting system used in conjunction with interactive whiteboard technology. The data discussed here are drawn from a qualitative study, carried out in the context of a British university pre-sessional programme in English for Academic Purposes and Study Skills for international students in the summers of 2003 and 2004. Research data were collected via a variety of ethnographic research instruments, namely classroom observations and feedback from critical colleagues, teacher's field notes, video recording of classes, semi-structured interviews with students, and pre- and post-course student questionnaires. The findings indicate that the electronic voting system was seen to increase considerably the scope of interactivity during the lessons by helping students to enhance their development into active participants. However, the data have also indicated that the levels of interactivity in the approaches adopted in the context investigated could still be considered relatively ''shallow'', and some suggestions have been provided to improve this aspect of technology use.

[1]  Kate Wall,et al.  Interactive whole class teaching in the National Literacy and Numercy Strategies , 2004 .

[2]  Debra Myhill,et al.  Interactive or inactive? a consideration of the nature of interaction in whole class teaching , 2004 .

[3]  Janet Moyles,et al.  How do primary school teachers define and implement ‘interactive teaching’ in the National Literacy Strategy in England? , 2003 .

[4]  Terry Goodison,et al.  Integrating ICT in the classroom: a case study of two contrasting lessons , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[5]  David Miller,et al.  Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school , 2001 .

[6]  David Miller,et al.  The Interactive Whiteboard as a Force for Pedagogic Change: The Experience of Five Elementary Schools in an English Education Authority , 2002 .

[7]  S. Higgins,et al.  The Impact of Interactive Whiteboards on Teacher--Pupil Interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. , 2006 .

[8]  Ian Hall,et al.  Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[9]  Mary Ann Bell.  Impact of the electronic interactive whiteboard on student attitudes and achievement in eighth-grade writing instruction , 2000 .

[10]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils , 1975 .

[11]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom , 1987 .

[12]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Getting to grips with "interactivity": helping teachers assess the educational value of CD-ROMs , 1998, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[13]  Jane Hislam,et al.  Pedagogical Dilemmas in the National Literacy Strategy: Primary teachers' perceptions, reflections and classroom behaviour , 2002 .

[14]  E. Wit.  Who wants to be… The use of a personal response system in statistics teaching , 2003 .

[15]  Maria Mroz,et al.  The Discourse of the Literacy Hour , 2000 .

[16]  Margaret I. Brown,et al.  Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: one practitioner's application , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[17]  Quintin I. Cutts,et al.  Maximising Dialogue in Lectures using Group Response Systems , 2004, CATE.

[18]  C. D. Smith.  Learning LOGO: effects on learning BASIC and statistics , 1986 .

[19]  Margaret I. Brown,et al.  Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  D. F. Clarke,et al.  Materials adaptation: why leave it all to the teacher? , 1989 .

[21]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[22]  Steve Higgins,et al.  Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[23]  Quintin I. Cutts,et al.  Connecting Learning Environments Using Electronic Voting Systems , 2005, ACE.

[24]  James V. Wertsch,et al.  Culture, communication, and cognition : Vygotskian perspectives , 1987 .