Differentiating complex network models: An engineering perspective

Network models that can capture the underlying network's topologies and functionalities are crucial for the development of complex network algorithms and protocols. In the engineering community, the performances of network algorithms and protocols are usually evaluated by running them on a network model. In most if not all reported work, the criteria used to determine such a network model rely on how close it matches the network data in terms of some basic topological characteristics. However, the intrinsic relations between a network topology and its functionalities are still unclear. A question arises naturally: For a network model which can reproduce some topological characteristics of the underlying network, is it reasonable and valid to use this model to be a test-bed for evaluating the network's performances? To answer this question, we take a close look at several typical complex network models of the AS-level Internet as examples of study. We find that although a model can represent the Internet in terms of topological metrics, it cannot be used to evaluate the Internet performances. Our findings reveal that the approaches using topological metrics to discriminate network models, which have been widely used in the engineering community, may lead to confusing or even incorrect conclusions.

[1]  Matthew Doar,et al.  A better model for generating test networks , 1996, Proceedings of GLOBECOM'96. 1996 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[2]  Paul R. Harper,et al.  Small world network models of the dynamics of HIV infection , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[4]  Filipi Nascimento Silva,et al.  A pattern recognition approach to complex networks , 2010 .

[5]  Dmitri Loguinov,et al.  Wealth-Based Evolution Model for the Internet AS-Level Topology , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[6]  J M Carlson,et al.  Highly optimized tolerance: a mechanism for power laws in designed systems. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[7]  Massimo Riccaboni,et al.  Scale-free models for the structure of business firm networks. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[9]  Dmitri Loguinov,et al.  Understanding and Modeling the Internet Topology: Economics and Evolution Perspective , 2010, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[10]  Daniel Massey,et al.  Collecting the internet AS-level topology , 2005, CCRV.

[11]  G. B. A. Barab'asi Competition and multiscaling in evolving networks , 2000, cond-mat/0011029.

[12]  Mahmoud Al-Ayyoub,et al.  Joint Routing, Channel Assignment, and Scheduling for Throughput Maximization in General Interference Models , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[13]  Miguel Rio,et al.  Network topologies: inference, modeling, and generation , 2008, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[14]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[15]  Jose C. Nacher,et al.  Structural characterization and modeling of ncRNA-protein interactions , 2010, Biosyst..

[16]  Albert,et al.  Topology of evolving networks: local events and universality , 2000, Physical review letters.

[17]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Simplified models of biological networks. , 2010, Annual review of biophysics.

[18]  Shi Zhou Understanding the evolution dynamics of internet topology. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Luciano da Fontoura Costa,et al.  Modeling worldwide highway networks , 2009 .

[20]  Yunong Zhang,et al.  A comprehensive multi-local-world model for complex networks , 2009 .

[21]  BERNARD M. WAXMAN,et al.  Routing of multipoint connections , 1988, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[22]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Evolution of the Internet and its cores , 2008 .

[23]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  A study of the spreading scheme for viral marketing based on a complex network model , 2010 .

[24]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  On distinguishing between Internet power law topology generators , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[25]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  The relationship between structural and functional connectivity: Graph theoretical analysis of an EEG neural mass model , 2010, NeuroImage.

[26]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  A comparative study of social network models: Network evolution models and nodal attribute models , 2008, Soc. Networks.

[27]  L. da F. Costa,et al.  Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements , 2005, cond-mat/0505185.

[28]  Priya Mahadevan,et al.  Systematic topology analysis and generation using degree correlations , 2006, SIGCOMM 2006.

[29]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[30]  Flavia Bonomo,et al.  Analysis and Models of Bilateral Investment Treaties Using a Social Networks Approach , 2010 .

[31]  Marc Schoenauer,et al.  On the evolution of scale-free topologies with a gene regulatory network model , 2009, Biosyst..