Sensitivity of Selected Colorado Soils to Form Ettringite/Thaumasite When Treated with Calcium-Based Stabilizers and When Soluble Sulfates Are Available

The sensitivity of five Colorado soils, which were selected to represent the variety of soils likely to be treated with calcium-based chemical stabilizers such as hydrated lime or Portland cement, to the formation of potentially expansive minerals is evaluated using thermodynamic principles based on Gibb?s free energy and direct measurements. Phase diagrams are used to predict the threshold levels of soluble sulfates that favor the formation of the expansive mineral ettringite, which is most widely blamed for deleterious expansion in sulfate bearing soils treated with calcium-based stabilizers. The results of the thermodynamic, phase diagram evaluation are checked against direct measurement of ettringite using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and the results agree well. The conclusions derived from this research are that, as expected, mineralogical differences among the soils affect the threshold level of soluble sulfates that trigger the development of ettringite and that the presence of soluble silica and the form of alumina present have a dominant effect. The research validates previous research that a safe lower limit of soluble sulfates is approximately 3,000 ppm as long as additional soluble sulfates do not migrate into the soil. A methodology is presented for using the DSC to directly assess the threshold level of sulfates for a particular soil. However, refinement of the method is a key goal of on-going research. The DSC method to assess the potential of a specific soil to react deleteriously with a calcium based stabilizer when sulfate content in the soil is above a threshold level should be implemented by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). This will require the purchase of a Q-2000, TA Instruments or equivalent DSC by the CDOT Materials and Geotechnical Branch.

[1]  D. Macphee,et al.  XRD, EDX and IR analysis of solid solutions between thaumasite and ettringite , 2002 .

[2]  Dallas N. Little,et al.  UPDATE ON SULFATE-INDUCED HEAVE IN TREATED CLAYS; PROBLEMATIC SULFATE LEVELS , 1992 .

[3]  TEXAS LIME TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM GUIDELINES FOR STABILIZATION OF SOILS CONTAINING SULFATES AUSTIN WHITE LIME, CHEMICAL LIME, , 2000 .

[4]  D. Damidot,et al.  Thermodynamic investigation of the CaOAl2O3CaSO4K2OH2O system at 25°C , 1993 .

[5]  Dimitris Dermatas,et al.  Clay Soil Heave Caused by Lime-Sulfate Reactions , 1992 .

[6]  P. Spry,et al.  The effects of chemical environment on the nucleation, growth, and stability of ettringite [Ca3Al(OH)6]2(SO4)3·26H2O , 2004 .

[7]  H. Taylor,et al.  Crystal Structure of Thaumasite, a Mineral containing [Si(OH)6]2− Groups , 1969, Nature.

[8]  Terry J. Logan,et al.  Ettringite solubility and geochemistry of the Ca(OH)2-Al2(SO4)3-H2O system at 1 atm pressure and 298 K , 1998 .

[9]  D. Roy,et al.  C4A3S hydration, ettringite formation, and its expansion mechanism: II. Microstructural observation of expansion , 1982 .

[10]  I. Odler,et al.  Possibilities of quantitative determination of the AFt-(ettringite) and AFm-(monosulphate) phases in hydrated cement pastes , 1984 .

[11]  M. Santhanam,et al.  Stability and reactivity of thaumasite at different pH levels , 2003 .

[12]  Dallas N. Little,et al.  Ettringite Formation in Lime-Treated Soils: Establishing Thermodynamic Foundations for Engineering Practice , 2005 .

[13]  John C. Cripps,et al.  Sulfur species in geological materials––sources and quantification , 2003 .

[14]  Tom Scullion,et al.  Measuring Sulfate in Subgrade Soil: Difficulties and Triumphs , 2003 .

[15]  H. Sverdrup Geochemistry, the key to understanding environmental chemistry , 1996 .

[16]  Della M. Roy,et al.  C4A3S hydration ettringite formation, and its expansion mechanism: I. expansion; Ettringite stability , 1981 .

[17]  H. Taylor,et al.  Crystal Structure of Ettringite , 1968, Nature.

[18]  P. K. Mehta Stability of Ettringite on Heating , 1972 .

[19]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  Practical problems from surprising soil behavior , 1986 .

[20]  P. K. Mehta,et al.  Expansion of ettringite by water adsorption , 1982 .

[21]  D. Hunter Lime-Induced Heave in Sulfate-Bearing Clay Soils , 1988 .

[22]  N. J. Crammond,et al.  The occurrence of thaumasite in modern construction – a review , 2002 .

[23]  Hans G. Othmer,et al.  Nonuniqueness of equilibria in closed reacting systems , 1976 .

[24]  Y. Shimada,et al.  Structural changes during thermal dehydration of ettringite , 2001 .

[25]  D. Damidot,et al.  Thermodynamic investigation of the CaO-Al[sub 2]O[sub 3]-CaCO[sub 3]-H[sub 2]O closed system at 25 C and the influence of Na[sub 2]O , 1994 .

[26]  C. Warren,et al.  The solubility of ettringite at 25°C , 1994 .

[27]  R. A. Cechner,et al.  CHEMICAL AND PETROGRAPHIC ANALYSES AND ASTM TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE STUDY OF DELAYED ETTRINGITE FORMATION , 2000 .

[28]  Tom Scullion,et al.  Hydrated Lime Stabilization of Sulfate-Bearing Vertisols in Texas , 2004 .

[29]  S. Barnett,et al.  An XRPD profile fitting investigation of the solid solution between ettringite, Ca6Al2(SO4)3(OH)12.26H2O, and carbonate ettringite, Ca6Al2(CO3)3(OH)12.26H2O , 2001 .

[30]  W. A. Tasong,et al.  Mechanisms by which ground granulated blastfurnace slag prevents sulphate attack of lime-stabilised kaolinite , 1999 .