Non-conventional methods for the control of post-harvest pear diseases.

Pears are highly perishable products, especially during the post-harvest phase, when considerable losses can occur. Among the fungal diseases, blue mold caused by Penicillium expansum, grey mould caused by Botrytis cinerea, Mucor rot caused by Mucor piriformis are common on pear fruits. Other (weak) pathogens like Phialophora malorum, Alternaria spp., and Cladosporium herbarum tend to infect wounds and senescent fruits. A post-harvest fungicide treatment can reduce decay but effectiveness decreases with the appearance of resistant strains. There is a clear need to develop new and alternative methods of controlling post-harvest diseases. The emerging technologies for the control of post-harvest fungal diseases are essentially threefold: application of antagonistic microorganisms, application of natural antimicrobial substances and application of sanitizing products. Two biological control products, Aspire (Candida oleophila I-182) (Ecogen, Langhorne, PA, USA) and Bio-Save 110 (Pseudomonas syringae) (EcoScience, Worcester, MA, USA; formerly Bio-Save 11) are currently registered in the USA for post-harvest application to pears. Other potential biocontrol agents have been isolated from fruit and shown to suppress post-harvest decay in pear. It is important that evaluation of these microorganisms be carried out in a product formulation because the formulation may improve or diminish antagonistic efficacy depending on the concentration of chemical product and the duration of exposure to the treatment. Plants produce a large number of secondary metabolites with antimicrobial effects on post-harvest pathogens. Detailed studies have been conducted on aromatic compounds, essential oils, volatile substances and isothiocyanates, with encouraging results. In particular, allyl-isothiocyanate used as a volatile substance, controls blue mould in 'Conference' and 'Kaiser' pear inoculated with a thiabendazole-resistant strain. Sanitizing products such as chlorine dioxide, peracetic acid and ozone have considerable fungicidal activity against P. expansum and M. piriformis, depending on the concentration of chemical product and the duration of exposure to the treatment. Sanitizing solutions can be integrated easily with current handling and storage practices; however, further research is required to define the effective procedures better.

[1]  O. Leoni,et al.  Bioassays of glucosinolate-derived isothiocyanates against postharvest pear pathogens. , 1996 .

[2]  E. Baraldi,et al.  Peracetic Acid and Chlorine Dioxide for Postharvest Control of Monilinia laxa in Stone Fruits. , 1999, Plant disease.

[3]  T. Tworkoski,et al.  Characterizing the mechanism of biological control of postharvest diseases on fruits with a simple method to study competition for nutrients. , 2000, Phytopathology.

[4]  W. Janisiewicz.  Ecological diversity, niche overlap, and coexistence of antagonists used in developing mixtures for biocontrol of postharvest diseases of apples , 1996 .

[5]  T. Righetti,et al.  Integration of Cultural Methods with Yeast Treatment for Control of Postharvest Fruit Decay in Pear , 1994 .

[6]  A. Marchi,et al.  Control of storage rots on various pear cultivars with a saprophytic strain of Pseudomonas syringae , 1992 .

[7]  W. Janisiewicz.  Enhancement of Biocontrol of Blue Mold with the Nutrient Analog 2-Deoxy-d-Glucose on Apples and Pears , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[8]  M. Ceponis,et al.  Market diseases of apples, pears, and quinces. , 1971 .

[9]  M. Wisniewski,et al.  Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: recent advances , 1992 .

[10]  E. Griffiths.  Iatrogenic Plant Diseases , 1981 .

[11]  O. Leoni,et al.  In vitro activity of glucosinolate‐derived isothiocyanates against postharvest fruit pathogens , 1993 .

[12]  D. Sugar,et al.  Interactions among fungi causing postharvest decay of pear , 1986 .

[13]  D. Caccioni,et al.  Inhibition of Germination and Growth of Fruit and Vegetable Postharvest Pathogenic Fungi by Essential Oil Components , 1994 .

[14]  W. Janisiewicz,et al.  Efficacy of commercial formulation of two biofungicides for control of blue mold and gray mold of apples in cold storage , 1997 .

[15]  O. Leoni,et al.  Antifungal vapour-phase activity of allyl-isothiocyanate against Penicillium expansum on pears , 2002 .

[16]  W. Janisiewicz,et al.  Postharvest control of blue mold and gray mold of apples and pears by dip treatment with pyrrolnitrin, a metabolite of Pseudomonas cepacia , 1991 .

[17]  Rip G. Rice,et al.  Uses of ozone in drinking water treatment , 1981 .

[18]  D. Sugar,et al.  Control of Postharvest Decay in Pear by Four Laboratory-Grown Yeasts and Two Registered Biocontrol Products. , 1999, Plant disease.

[19]  R. Spotts,et al.  Control of postharvest pear diseases using natural saprophytic yeast colonists and their combination with a low dosage of thiabendazole , 1996 .

[20]  C. Wilson,et al.  Potential for biological control of postharvest plant diseases , 1985 .

[21]  D. Sugar,et al.  Wounding, wound healing and staining of mature pear fruit , 1998 .

[22]  I. Johnson,et al.  The clastogenic effects of isothiocyanates. , 1993, Mutation research.

[23]  R. Heaney,et al.  Glucosinolates and their breakdown products in food and food plants. , 1983, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[24]  Y. Elad,et al.  Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on Botrytis cinerea pathogenicity , 1996 .

[25]  K. B. Johnson,et al.  Establishment of Bacterial Antagonists of Erwinia amylovora on Pear and Apple Blossoms as Influenced by Inoculum Preparation. , 1998, Phytopathology.

[26]  K. Knobloch,et al.  Mode of action of essential oil components on whole cells of bacteria and fungi in plate tests , 1988 .

[27]  R. G. Roberts,et al.  Chlorine Dioxide for Reduction of Postharvest Pathogen Inoculum during Handling of Tree Fruits , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[28]  T. Cembali,et al.  Mucor Species in Orchard Soil – Population Dynamics and Pathogenicity on Pear Fruit , 2000, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[29]  V. Sanchis,et al.  Tolerance of Penicillium expansum to postharvest fungicide treatments in apple packingshouses in Lerida (Spain) , 2004, Mycopathologia.

[30]  G. Mazza,et al.  Antimicrobial properties of isothiocyanates in food preservation , 1995 .

[31]  T. Michailides,et al.  Postharvest diseases of pome and stone fruits caused by Mucor piriformis in the Pacific Northwest and California. , 1990 .

[32]  M. Wisniewski,et al.  A selection strategy for microbial antagonists to control postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables , 1993 .

[33]  M. Wisniewski,et al.  Effect of inoculum concentration and salt solutions on biological control of postharvest diseases of apple with Candida sp. , 1990 .

[34]  R. Spotts,et al.  Effect of Ozonated Water on Postharvest Pathogens of Pear in Laboratory and Packinghouse Tests , 1992 .

[35]  B. B. Peters,et al.  Chlorine and chlorine dioxide for control of d'Anjou pear decay. , 1980 .

[36]  M. Mari,et al.  Biological Control of Gray Mold in Pears by Antagonistic Bacteria , 1996 .

[37]  K. Isshiki,et al.  Preliminary Examination of Allyl Isothiocyanate Vapor for Food Preservation , 1992 .

[38]  Lise Korsten,et al.  Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits. , 2002, Annual review of phytopathology.

[39]  A. B. Caragay.  Cancer-preventive foods and ingredients , 1992 .