Connectivism: a theory for learning in a world of growing complexity

Connectivism is an emergent theory that attempts to capture and reflect the complexity of learning in a world of proliferating information. The authors review the origins and underpinnings of connectivism, situating it within more established and accepted traditional learning theory and demonstrating how it both challenges and expands our understanding of how, why and when learning occurs. They also explore what organisations should do differently, how learning design should change and how organisational performance potential can be improved using the principles of connectivism. The authors offer practical examples of how these principles are applied in workplace learning and e-learning, and suggest specific instructional design strategies and activities in line with the principles. Finally, the authors conclude with brief suggestions for future research.

[1]  George Siemens,et al.  Connectivism: Learning Theory or Pastime of the Self-Amused? , 2006 .

[2]  W. F. Hill.  Learning: A Survey of Psychological Interpretations , 1972 .

[3]  Chris Kenyon,et al.  From andragogy to heutagogy , 2000 .

[4]  Melanie Clay.  Development of Training and Support Programs for Distance Education Instructors. , 1999 .

[5]  E. Losh.  In Country with Tactical Iraqi : Trust, Identity, and Language Learning in a Military Video Game , 2005 .

[6]  Tom H. Brown,et al.  Beyond constructivism: navigationism in the knowledge era , 2006 .

[7]  George Siemens.  Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[8]  Marcy P. Driscoll,et al.  Psychology of Learning for Instruction (3rd ed. , 2005 .

[9]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[10]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[11]  Michael J. Marquardt,et al.  The power of learning in action learning: a conceptual analysis of how the five schools of adult learning theories are incorporated within the practice of action learning , 2004 .

[12]  Lisa Gualtieri.  Five Questions ... For George Siemens , 2009, ELERN.

[13]  Holly M. Hutchins,et al.  Cross‐disciplinary contributions to e‐learning design: a tripartite design model , 2008 .

[14]  Nancy M. Carlson,et al.  Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know , 2001 .

[15]  George Siemens,et al.  Handbook of Emerging Technologies for Learning , 2009 .

[16]  Barbara L. Stewart,et al.  Valuing the adult learner in e‐learning: part one – a conceptual model for corporate settings , 2005 .

[17]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[18]  Stephen Downes,et al.  Learning Networks and Connective Knowledge , 2010 .

[19]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective , 2008 .

[20]  Chris Kenyon,et al.  Heutagogy: A Child of Complexity Theory , 2007 .

[21]  Rita Kop,et al.  Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? , 2008 .

[22]  S. Merriam,et al.  Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide , 1991 .

[23]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from a Design Perspective. , 1993 .

[24]  S. Lynham.  Theory building in the human resource development profession , 2000 .