Observation of contrast agent response to chirp insonation with a simultaneous optical-acoustical system

Rayleigh-Plesset analysis, ultra-high speed photography, and single bubble acoustical recordings previously were applied independently to characterize the radial oscillation and resulting echoes from a microbubble in response to an ultrasonic pulse. In addition, high-speed photography has shown that microbubbles are destroyed over a single pulse or pulse train by diffusion and fragmentation. In order to develop a single model to characterize microbubble echoes based on oscillatory and destructive characteristics, an optical-acoustical system was developed to simultaneously record the optical image and backscattered echo from each microbubble. Combined observation provides the opportunity to compare predictions for oscillation and echoes with experimental results and identify discrepancies due to diffusion or fragmentation. Optimization of agents and insonating pulse parameters may be facilitated with this system. The mean correlation of the predicted and experimental radius-time curves and echoes exceeds 0.7 for the parameters studied here. An important application of this new system is to record and analyze microbubble response to a long pulse in which diffusion is shown to occur over the pulse duration. The microbubble response to an increasing or decreasing chirp is evaluated using this new tool. For chirp insonation beginning with the lower center frequency, low-frequency modulation of the oscillation envelope was obvious. However, low-frequency modulation was not observed in the radial oscillation produced by decreasing chirp insonation. Comparison of the echoes from similar sized microbubbles following increasing and decreasing chirp insonation demonstrated that the echoes were not time-reversed replicas. Using a transmission pressure of 620 kPa, the -6 dB echo length was 0.9 and 1.1 /spl mu/s for increasing and decreasing chirp insonation, respectively (P = 0.02). The mean power in the low-frequency portion of the echoes was 8 (mV)/sup 2/ and 13 (mV)/sup 2/ for increasing and decreasing chirp insonation, respectively (P = 0.01).

[1]  R. Y. Chiao,et al.  Coded excitation for diagnostic ultrasound: a system developer's perspective , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  Jørgen A Jensen,et al.  Clinical evaluation of chirp-coded excitation in medical ultrasound. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  P. Dayton,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Optical observation of contrast agent destruction , 2000 .

[5]  M. Longo,et al.  Dissolution behavior of lipid monolayer-coated, air-filled microbubbles: Effect of lipid hydrophobic chain length , 2002 .

[6]  F Forsberg,et al.  Destruction of contrast microbubbles and the association with inertial cavitation. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Basic Acoustic Properties of Microbubbles , 2002, Echocardiography.

[8]  L. Hoff,et al.  Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Lalu Mansinha,et al.  Localization of the complex spectrum: the S transform , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[10]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Experimental evaluation of a non-linear coded excitation method for contrast imaging. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[11]  Charles C. Church,et al.  The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles , 1995 .

[12]  P. Dayton,et al.  Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  N de Jong,et al.  Optical imaging of contrast agent microbubbles in an ultrasound field with a 100-MHz camera. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Nonlinear coded excitation method for ultrasound contrast imaging. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  A. Bouakaz,et al.  Harmonic chirp imaging method for ultrasound contrast agent , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  M. Versluis,et al.  Ultrasound-induced gas release from contrast agent microbubbles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  P. Dayton,et al.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[19]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  Absolute measurement of ultrasonic backscatter from single microbubbles. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  Vera Behar,et al.  Parameter optimization of pulse compression in ultrasound imaging systems with coded excitation. , 2004, Ultrasonics.