Proficiency testing of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) labs in Brazil by measurement comparisons

This work reports the analysis and main results of a recently concluded proficiency testing round with the major electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) laboratories in Brazil. Seven labs conducted radiated emission measurements at their test facilities under the coordination of an independent third party supervised by the Brazilian accreditation body, INMETRO. Six of them are currently the only labs accredited on EMC measurements in Brazil. The guidelines of international standards such as ISO/IEC Guide 43 and ISO 13528 were followed, while the scope of the tests focused on EMC compliance of information technology devices, based on CISPR 22. A multi-tone signal generator was specifically designed and assembled for the present proficiency testing conditions. Statistical metrics such as z-score and normalized error have been adopted to assess global and individual performances of the participant laboratories. The normalized error indicated 10 unacceptable results out of 35 results, while only 3 out of 35 z-scores were out of the acceptance range. Considering that the participant labs are actually only for test measurements (not for calibration), the overall performance may be taken as satisfactory, based on the fact that the z-score should be used in this case.

[1]  Ulf Örnemark,et al.  Surveys on the accreditation of providers of proficiency testing and external quality assessment schemes , 2006 .

[2]  Leonard Steinborn,et al.  International Organization for Standardization ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories , 2004 .

[3]  D. Bozec,et al.  A good practice guide for the use of GTEM cells in EMC measurements according to IEC61000-4-20 , 2004, 2004 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37559).

[4]  P. Wilson.  On correlating TEM cell and OATS emission measurements , 1995 .

[5]  Mark I. Montrose,et al.  Testing for EMC Compliance , 2004 .

[6]  W.B. Halaberda,et al.  Measurement comparisons of radiated test facilities , 1992, International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[8]  H. F. Garn,et al.  Problems with radiated-emission testing at 3 m distance according to CISPR 11 and CISPR 22 , 1993, 1993 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[9]  F. E. Grubbs.  Sample Criteria for Testing Outlying Observations , 1950 .

[10]  K. Osabe,et al.  Inter-laboratory Comparison Result as the Proficiency Testing Program of EMI Test Sites in Japan , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[11]  W. J. Dixon,et al.  Analysis of Extreme Values , 1950 .

[12]  S. Standard.  GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[13]  Lowell E. Kolb.  Statistical comparison of site-to-site measurement reproducibility , 1996, Proceedings of Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[14]  Daniel W. Tholen.  Impact of international standards and initiatives on proficiency testing for medical laboratories , 2004 .

[15]  Yeon-Choon Chung,et al.  Interlaboratory comparison of radiated emission measurements using a spherical dipole radiator , 2001 .

[16]  Tae-Weon Kang,et al.  Reproducibility and uncertainty in radiated emission measurements at open area test sites and in semianechoic chambers using a spherical dipole radiator , 2001 .

[17]  Ming-Shing Lin,et al.  Evaluation for test competence of EMC laboratories , 1998, 1998 IEEE EMC Symposium. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Symposium Record (Cat. No.98CH36253).

[18]  B.S. Rao,et al.  EMI proficiency testing program - conducted emission measurement , 2004, 2004 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37559).

[19]  J. DeMarinis.  Ualification Of Radiated EMI Test Sites Using Statistical Methods , 1992, International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.