On-Site Renewable Energy and Green Buildings: A System-Level Analysis.

Adopting a green building rating system (GBRSs) that strongly considers use of renewable energy can have important environmental consequences, particularly in developing countries. In this paper, we studied on-site renewable energy and GBRSs at the system level to explore potential benefits and challenges. While we have focused on GBRSs, the findings can offer additional insight for renewable incentives across sectors. An energy model was built for 25 sites to compute the potential solar and wind power production on-site and available within the building footprint and regional climate. A life-cycle approach and cost analysis were then completed to analyze the environmental and economic impacts. Environmental impacts of renewable energy varied dramatically between sites, in some cases, the environmental benefits were limited despite the significant economic burden of those renewable systems on-site and vice versa. Our recommendation for GBRSs, and broader policies and regulations, is to require buildings with higher environmental impacts to achieve higher levels of energy performance and on-site renewable energy utilization, instead of fixed percentages.

[1]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Renewable Energy in the Context of Sustainable Development , 2011 .

[2]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .

[3]  Melissa M. Bilec,et al.  Impact of lifetime on US residential building LCA results , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  Jennifer Cooper,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment weights to support environmentally preferable purchasing in the United States. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  Introduction The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework , 2004 .

[6]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[7]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings , 2010 .

[8]  Ö. Boydak,et al.  Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) and Its Comparison with Turkey Applications , 2017 .

[9]  G. Norris,et al.  TRACI the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts , 2002 .

[10]  Melissa M Bilec,et al.  Life-cycle thinking and the LEED rating system: global perspective on building energy use and environmental impacts. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Michael Buckley,et al.  Tracking the Sun VIII , 2015 .

[12]  T. Veziroglu.  Direct solar energy , 1991 .

[13]  S. Citherlet,et al.  Energy and environmental comparison of three variants of a family house during its whole life span , 2007 .

[14]  Michael Buckley,et al.  Tracking the Sun VIII The Installed Price of Residential and Non-Residential Photovoltaic Systems in the United States , 2017 .

[15]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[16]  J. Zuboy,et al.  Benchmarking Non-Hardware Balance-of-System (Soft) Costs for U.S. Photovoltaic Systems, Using a Bottom-Up Approach and Installer Survey - Second Edition , 2013 .