Distal wall delineation using automated Dual Snake paradigm: A multi-center and multi-ethnic carotid ultrasound evaluation

We present here a novel and patented completely automated IMT measurement system that we developed for common carotid arterial ultrasound longitudinal images, called Carotid Measurement Using Dual Snakes (CMUDS) - a class of AtheroEdge™ system. CMUDS is a dual deformable parametric model (snake) system where the dual snakes evolve simultaneously and are forced to maintain a regularized distance to prevent collapsing or diverging. We benchmarked CMUDS against a conventional single snake (CMUSS). CMUDS is totally automatic while CMUSS is semi-automatic. For performance evaluation, two readers manually traced the lumen-intima (LI) and media-adventitia (MA) borders of our multi-institutional, multi-ethnic, and multi-scanner database of 655 longitudinal B-Mode ultrasound images. CMUDS and CMUSS correctly processed all 665 images. The average IMT biases were equal to 0.030±0.284 mm and -0.004±0.273 mm for CMUDS, and -0.011±0.329 mm and -0.045±0.317 mm for CMUSS. The Figure of Merit of the system was 96.0% and 99.6% for CMUDS and 98.5% and 94.4% for CMUSS. CMUDS improved accuracy (Wilcoxon, p<;0.02) and reproducibility (Fisher, p<;3 10-2), proving that the novel CMUDS system is adaptable to large multi-centric studies, where a standard IMT measurement technique is required.

[1]  P. Touboul,et al.  Use of monitoring software to improve the measurement of carotid wall thickness by B-mode imaging , 1992, Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension.

[2]  Marcello Demi,et al.  The First Absolute Central Moment in Low-Level Image Processing , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[3]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Completely Automated Multiresolution Edge Snapper—A New Technique for an Accurate Carotid Ultrasound IMT Measurement: Clinical Validation and Benchmarking on a Multi-Institutional Database , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  F. Faita,et al.  Real‐time Measurement System for Evaluation of the Carotid Intima‐Media Thickness With a Robust Edge Operator , 2008, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[5]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Associations of Edge-Detected and Manual-Traced Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Measurements With Framingham Risk Factors: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis , 2011, Stroke.

[6]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Evaluation of Carotid Wall Thickness by using Computed Tomography and Semiautomated Ultrasonographic Software , 2011 .

[7]  Christos P. Loizou,et al.  Snakes based segmentation of the common carotid artery intima media , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[8]  Hans Burkhardt,et al.  Using snakes to detect the intimal and adventitial layers of the common carotid artery wall in sonographic images , 2002, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[9]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[10]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Characterization of a Completely User-Independent Algorithm for Carotid Artery Segmentation in 2-D Ultrasound Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  J. Polak,et al.  Inter‐Reader Differences in Common Carotid Artery Intima‐Media Thickness , 2011, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[13]  A. Hofman,et al.  Predictive Value of Noninvasive Measures of Atherosclerosis for Incident Myocardial Infarction: The Rotterdam Study , 2004, Circulation.

[14]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Greedy Algorithm for Error Correction in Automatically Produced Boundaries from Low Contrast Ventriculograms , 2000, Pattern Analysis & Applications.