Riding personal mobility vehicles on the road: an analysis of the intentions of Chinese users

In China, there are no road rights for personal mobility vehicles (PMVs), but sales of PMVs in China are rapidly increasing, and at present, a large group of PMV users has been formed. Research on the demand and intentions of PMV users holds great significance for road safety and policy formulation. This research adopts an online questionnaire based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model and introduces perceived risk, product satisfaction, and policy measures to construct a model of the impact mechanism of user intentions to ride PMVs on the road. First, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 418 PMV users in China, and the factors affecting their intentions to ride PMVs on the road were analyzed through structural equation modeling (SEM). The results from analyzing the questionnaires show that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, perceived risk and policy measures have a significant positive impact on user intentions to ride PMVs on the road. However, product satisfaction has no significant impact on user intentions to ride PMVs on the road, but through risk perception, it has a mediating effect on user intentions. In addition, there are four adjustment variables: gender, age, educational level and experience witnessing others riding PMVs on the road. The results of multigroup SEM analysis show that there are significant differences in the path of user intentions to ride PMVs on the road. Second, compared with other surveys obtained from the Internet among 307 non-users and non-owners of PMVs, there are significant differences in perceived risk, policy measures and intentions to ride PMVs on the road. Implications for policy-making and suggestions for future research are discussed.

[1]  Frédéric Vanderhaegen,et al.  Toward a Petri Net Based Model to Control Conflicts of Autonomy between Cyber-Physical & Human-Systems , 2016 .

[2]  Johanna Zmud,et al.  Towards an Understanding of the Travel Behavior Impact of Autonomous Vehicles , 2017 .

[3]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age , 2018 .

[4]  Charitha Dias,et al.  Evaluation of Safe Avoidance Distance for Pedestrians in Personal Mobility Vehicles and Pedestrian Mixed Traffic: A Simulation Based Study , 2017 .

[5]  B. Sovacool,et al.  Who buys New Energy Vehicles in China? Assessing social-psychological predictors of purchasing awareness, intention, and policy , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[6]  Natasha Merat,et al.  What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems , 2017 .

[7]  Charitha Dias,et al.  Modeling pedestrians’ subjective danger perception toward personal mobility vehicles , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[8]  Frédéric Vanderhaegen.  Dissonance Engineering: A New Challenge to Analyse Risky Knowledge When using a System , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[9]  Susan A. Shaheen,et al.  EasyConnect: low-speed modes linked to transit planning project: interim working paper , 2006 .

[10]  Yanyong Guo,et al.  Evaluating factors affecting electric bike users’ registration of license plate in China using Bayesian approach , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[11]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers , 2014 .

[12]  Dan Blanchette,et al.  Adjusting for Unequal Selection Probability in Multilevel Models: A Comparison of Software Packages , 2005 .

[13]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Why do people use information kiosks? A validation of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[16]  Guizhen Yu,et al.  Are electric self-balancing scooters safe in vehicle crash accidents? , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Caroline J Rodier,et al.  EasyConnect II: Integrating Transportation, Information, and Energy Technologies at Transit Oriented Developments , 2005 .

[18]  Megan S. Ryerson,et al.  Factors influencing the choice of shared bicycles and shared electric bikes in Beijing , 2016 .

[19]  Frédéric Vanderhaegen,et al.  Reinforced learning systems based on merged and cumulative knowledge to predict human actions , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[20]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  ESTIMATING THE TECHNOLOGY FRONTIER FOR PERSONAL ELECTRIC VEHICLES , 2005 .

[21]  Kimihiko Nakano,et al.  Proposal for Personal Mobility Vehicle , 2009 .

[22]  Frédéric Vanderhaegen,et al.  Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human–machine systems? , 2017, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[23]  Ching-Fu Chen,et al.  Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers--The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement , 2011 .

[24]  Kevin Fang,et al.  Skateboarding for transportation: exploring the factors behind an unconventional mode choice among university skateboard commuters , 2019 .

[25]  David Crundall,et al.  An application of the theory of planned behaviour to truck driving behaviour and compliance with regulations. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Serge Debernard,et al.  Principles of adjustable autonomy: a framework for resilient human–machine cooperation , 2010, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[27]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[28]  Nelson Chan,et al.  Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Potential to Facilitate the First- and Last-Mile Public Transit Connections , 2016 .

[29]  Elliot W. Martin,et al.  Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: a tale of two U.S. cities , 2014 .

[30]  Takamasa Iryo,et al.  Effect on Travelers' Activities and Environmental Impacts by Introducing a Next-Generation Personal Transport System in a City , 2013 .

[31]  Ludwig Theuvsen,et al.  Non-participants interest in CSA – Insights from Germany , 2019, Journal of Rural Studies.

[32]  Charitha Dias,et al.  Simulating Interactions between Pedestrians, Segway Riders and Cyclists in Shared Spaces Using Social Force Model , 2018 .

[33]  D. Cicchetti.  Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .

[34]  Jianping Ge,et al.  Electric vehicle development in Beijing: An analysis of consumer purchase intention , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[35]  Ryosuke Ando,et al.  Measuring the Acceptability of Self-Balancing Two-Wheeled Personal Mobility Vehicles , 2013 .

[36]  Noorminshah A. Iahad,et al.  The history of UTAUT model and its impact on ICT acceptance and usage by academicians , 2012, Education and Information Technologies.

[37]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems (ARTS): An adaptation of the UTAUT model , 2016 .

[38]  Lesley Strawderman,et al.  Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[39]  R. Sickles,et al.  An International Comparison of Technology Adoption and Efficiency: A Dynamic Panel Model , 1999 .

[40]  Ang Li,et al.  An analysis on users' evaluation for self-balancing two-wheeled personal mobility vehicles , 2012, 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[41]  Frédéric Vanderhaegen,et al.  Towards increased systems resilience: New challenges based on dissonance control for human reliability in Cyber-Physical&Human Systems , 2017, Annu. Rev. Control..

[42]  Hideki Hashimoto,et al.  Human balance control ability for affinitive personal vehicle , 2013, 2013 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI).

[43]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Are electric vehicles masculinized? Gender, identity, and environmental values in Nordic transport practices and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) preferences , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[44]  Yukun Bao,et al.  Determinants of user acceptance and use of open government data (OGD): An empirical investigation in Bangladesh , 2019, Technology in Society.

[45]  Hamed Khazaei,et al.  Electric Vehicles and Factors That Influencing Their Adoption Moderating Effects of Driving Experience and Voluntariness of Use ( Conceptual Framework ) , 2016 .

[46]  Il Im,et al.  An international comparison of technology adoption: Testing the UTAUT model , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of cooperative infrastructure-to-vehicle systems on driver behavior , 2012 .

[48]  Ryosuke Ando,et al.  Acceptability of Personal Mobility Vehicles to Public in Japan: Results of Social Trial in Toyota City , 2013 .

[49]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Evaluating the safety impacts of powered two wheelers on a shared roadway in China using automated video analysis , 2018 .