White space and digital remediation of design practice in architecture: A case study of Frank O. Gehry

The digitalisation of architecture has intensified the entanglement of digital materiality and design practice due to the process of remediation, which comprises both conceptual and organisational processes. The analysis of remediation demonstrates the ways in which advanced technology enables architects to explore white spaces, defined as the open-ended, unmapped, in-between, and not yet realised territories of conceptual, organisational and physical spaces. Consequently, the process of remediation changes both design practices and the experience of physical spaces. This paper investigates the case of a leading architect, Frank O. Gehry, who has pioneered the digital remediation of architecture. The premise of this paper is that sociomaterial entanglement is an experience idiosyncratic to individual architects, who can escape the determinism of digital materiality by developing their unique digital tools. This paper also stresses the importance of power relations for the construction of digital materiality, which, in turn, influences design practices and innovation in architecture. The paper investigates digital materiality and design practice in architecture.Our empirical study analyses the case of the pioneering architect Frank Gehry.Architects remediate design tools causing a unique sociomaterial entanglement.Remediation changes design practice by enabling the exploration of white space.

[1]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Managing as Designing: Lessons for Organization Leaders from the Design Practice of Frank O. Gehry , 2008, Design Issues.

[2]  P. Draper Reflexive methodology - new vistas for qualitative research: Media Reviews , 2008 .

[3]  Timon Beyes,et al.  Strangely Familiar: The Uncanny and Unsiting Organizational Analysis , 2013 .

[4]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  Digital architecture as a challenge for design pedagogy: theory, knowledge, models and medium , 2008 .

[6]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[7]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[8]  William J Mitchell BEYOND THE IVORY TOWER: Constructing Complexity in the Digital Age , 2004, Science.

[9]  Karen Barad Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[10]  Carlos Eduardo Verzola Vaz,et al.  CAD Scripting and Visual Programming Languages for Implementing Computational Design Concepts: A Comparison from a Pedagogical Point of View , 2012 .

[11]  P. Jarzabkowski,et al.  Placing Strategy Discourse in Context: Sociomateriality, Sensemaking and Power 1 , 2013 .

[12]  Martin Harris,et al.  Organizational politics, strategic change and the evaluation of CAD , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Sue Newell,et al.  The Sociomaterialty of Information Systems: Current Status, Future Directions , 2014, MIS Q..

[14]  Sophia Psarra,et al.  Architecture and Narrative: The Formation of Space and Cultural Meaning , 2009 .

[15]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Identity Orientation, Social Exchange, and Information Technology Use in Interorganizational Collaborations , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Bruce Lindsey Digital Gehry: Material Resistance, Digital Construction , 2001 .

[17]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  D. Kirsh,et al.  Changing the Rules , 2001 .

[19]  W. Orlikowski The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research , 2010 .

[20]  Branko Kolarevic MANUFACTURING DIGITAL ARCHITECTURES (Manufacturing Digital Architecture) , 2001 .

[21]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[23]  J. Bolter,et al.  Remediation: Understanding New Media , 1999 .

[24]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Managing technological change in the digital age: the role of architectural frames , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..

[25]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. , 1991 .

[26]  Ray Bert Building Art: The Life and Work of Frank Gehry , By Paul Goldberger. New York City: Alfred A. Knopf, 2015 , 2016 .

[27]  Karen Barad Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning , 2007 .

[28]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[29]  Joseph Francis Wong,et al.  The text of free-form architecture: qualitative study of the discourse of four architects , 2010 .

[30]  John Child,et al.  Organizations Unfettered: Organizational Form in an Information-Intensive Economy , 2001 .

[31]  Antonio Iera,et al.  From "smart objects" to "social objects": The next evolutionary step of the internet of things , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[32]  Katharina Weiss,et al.  Skateboarding Space And The City Architecture And The Body , 2016 .

[33]  P. Keinz,et al.  Synergies among Producer Firms, Lead Users, and User Communities: The Case of the LEGO Producer–User Ecosystem† , 2014 .

[34]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation and Strategy , 2007 .

[35]  Suvi Nenonen,et al.  Managing Co‐Creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation , 2015 .

[36]  Oscar Hauptman,et al.  What Machines Can't Do: Politics and Technology in the Industrial Enterprise , 1995 .

[37]  Michael A. Ambrose,et al.  Agent Provocateur – BIM in the Academic Design Studio , 2012 .

[38]  Juan Pablo Bonta American Architects and Texts: A Computer-Aided Analysis of the Literature , 1996 .

[39]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Chris Steyaert,et al.  Spacing organization: non-representational theory and performing organizational space , 2012 .

[41]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[42]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[43]  Robert J. Thomas,et al.  What machines can't do : politics and technology in the industrial enterprise , 1995 .

[44]  Cal Swann,et al.  Action Research and the Practice of Design , 2002, Design Issues.

[45]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Sociomateriality - taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[46]  Mark W. Johnson,et al.  Seizing the White Space: Business Model Innovation for Growth and Renewal , 2010 .

[47]  Lev Manovich Alan Kay's universal media machine , 2007 .

[48]  Rachel Botsman,et al.  What's Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption , 2010 .

[49]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Sociomateriality as a Lens for Design: Imbrication and the constitution of technology and organization , 2012, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[50]  T. Gieryn,et al.  A Space for Place in Sociology , 2000 .

[51]  Neil Spiller,et al.  Digital Architecture Now: A Global Survey of Emerging Talent , 2009 .

[52]  Diane Gromala,et al.  Windows and Mirrors - Interaction Design, Digital Art, and the Myth of Transparency , 2003 .

[53]  A. Spicer,et al.  Hyper-Organizational Space in the Work of J. G. Ballard , 2008 .

[54]  Karin D. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Introduction: Emerging Principles in Social Studies of Science , 1983 .

[55]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: From Organization Design to Organization Designing , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[56]  M C Maletz,et al.  Managing in the whitespace. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[57]  Esther da Costa Meyer Frank Gehry: On Line , 2008 .

[58]  Alistair Mutch,et al.  Sociomateriality - Taking the wrong turning? , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[59]  P. Leonardi,et al.  What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing , 2010 .

[60]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  Creating a Space For Change Within Sociomaterial Entanglements , 2012, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Entanglements in Practice: Performing Anonymity Through Social Media , 2014, MIS Q..

[62]  K. Connellan The Psychic Life of White: Power and Space , 2013 .

[63]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[64]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[65]  J. Whyte,et al.  Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations as `Epistemic Objects' , 2009 .

[66]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[67]  D. O’Doherty,et al.  New Sites/Sights: Exploring the White Spaces of Organization , 2013 .

[68]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[69]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Organizational Design and the Gehry Experience , 2003 .

[70]  Ruairi Glynn,et al.  Digital Architecture, Passages Through Hinterlands , 2009 .

[71]  Martin Harris,et al.  Power, knowledge and social process in technology analysis: the case of CAD/CAM , 1997, J. Inf. Technol..

[72]  Henry Jenkins The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence , 2004 .

[73]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[74]  Anne-Laure Fayard,et al.  Affordances for practice , 2014, Inf. Organ..

[75]  Branko Kolarevic,et al.  Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing , 2004 .

[76]  A. Madanipour Urban Design and Dilemmas of Space , 1996 .