Hybrid G-PRNU: Optimal parameter selection for scale-invariant asymmetric source smartphone identification

The ease in counterfeiting both origin and content of a video necessitates the search for a reliable method to identify the source of a media file a crucial part of forensic investigation. One of the most accepted solutions to identify the source of a digital image involves comparison of its photo-response non-uniformity (PRNU) fingerprint. However, for videos, prevalent methods are not as efficient as image source identification techniques. This is due to the fact that the fingerprint is affected by the postprocessing steps done to generate the video. In this paper, we answer affirmatively to the question of whether one can use images to generate the reference fingerprint pattern to identify a video source. We introduce an approach called “Hybrid G-PRNU” that provides a scale-invariant solution for video source identification by matching its fingerprint with the one extracted from images. Another goal of our work is to find the optimal parameters to reach an optimal identification rate. Experiments performed demonstrate higher identification rate, while doing asymmetric comparison of video PRNU with the reference pattern generated from images, over several test cases. Further the fingerprint extractor used for this paper is being made freely available for scholars and researchers in the domain.

[1]  Danny Crookes,et al.  Digital video source identification based on green-channel photo response non-uniformity (G-PRNU) , 2016 .

[2]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Spatially adaptive statistical modeling of wavelet image coefficients and its application to denoising , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[3]  Zeno J. M. H. Geradts,et al.  Using Sensor Noise to Identify Low Resolution Compressed Videos from YouTube , 2009, IWCF.

[4]  Chang-Tsun Li Source camera identification using enhanced sensor pattern noise , 2010, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur..

[5]  Jean-Luc Dugelay,et al.  Videos versus still images: Asymmetric sensor pattern noise comparison on mobile phones , 2017, Media Watermarking, Security, and Forensics.

[6]  Luisa Verdoliva,et al.  Blind PRNU-Based Image Clustering for Source Identification , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[7]  Mo Chen,et al.  Determining Image Origin and Integrity Using Sensor Noise , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[8]  A. K. Karunakar,et al.  Digital camera identification using PRNU: A feature based approach , 2016, Digit. Investig..

[10]  Miroslav Goljan,et al.  Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[11]  Mo Chen,et al.  Digital imaging sensor identification (further study) , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Marco Fontani,et al.  VISION: a video and image dataset for source identification , 2017, EURASIP Journal on Information Security.

[13]  Marco Fontani,et al.  A Hybrid Approach to Video Source Identification , 2017, ArXiv.

[14]  Mo Chen,et al.  Source digital camcorder identification using sensor photo response non-uniformity , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[15]  Jan Lukás,et al.  Detecting digital image forgeries using sensor pattern noise , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[16]  Yong Yu,et al.  Exploring New Authentication Protocols for Sensitive Data Protection on Smartphones , 2018, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[17]  Min Wu,et al.  Exploring compression effects for improved source camera identification using strongly compressed video , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[18]  Judith Redi,et al.  Digital image forensics: a booklet for beginners , 2010, Multimedia Tools and Applications.