Considering the Value of 3D Cultures for Enhancing the Understanding of Adhesion, Proliferation, and Osteogenesis on Titanium Dental Implants

Background: Individuals with pathologic conditions and restorative deficiencies might benefit from a combinatorial approach encompassing stem cells and dental implants; however, due to the various surface textures and coatings, the influence of titanium dental implants on cells exhibits extensive, wide variations. Three-dimensional (3D) cultures of stem cells on whole dental implants are superior in testing implant properties and were used to examine their capabilities thoroughly. Materials and methods: The surface micro-topography of five titanium dental implants manufactured by sandblasting with titanium, aluminum, corundum, or laser sintered and laser machined was compared in this study. After characterization, including particle size distribution and roughness, the adhesion, proliferation, and viability of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) cultured on the whole-body implants were tested at three time points (one to seven days). Finally, the capacity of the implant to induce ADSCs’ spontaneous osteoblastic differentiation was examined at the same time points, assessing the gene expression of collagen type 1 (coll-I), osteonectin (osn), alkaline phosphatase (alp), and osteocalcin (osc). Results: Laser-treated (Laser Mach and Laser Sint) implants exhibited the highest adhesion degree; however, limited proliferation was observed, except for Laser Sint implants, while viability differences were seen throughout the three time points, except for Ti Blast implants. Sandblasted surfaces (Al Blast, Cor Blast, and Ti Blast) outpaced the laser-treated ones, inducing higher amounts of coll-I, osn, and alp, but not osc. Among the sandblasted surfaces, Ti Blast showed moderate roughness and the highest superficial texture density, favoring the most significant spontaneous differentiation relative to all the other implant surfaces. Conclusions: The results indicate that 3D cultures of stem cells on whole-body titanium dental implants is a practical and physiologically appropriate way to test the biological characteristics of the implants, revealing peculiar differences in ADSCs’ adhesion, proliferation, and activity toward osteogenic commitment in the absence of specific osteoinductive cues. In addition, the 3D method would allow researchers to test various implant surfaces more thoroughly. Integrating with preconditioned stem cells would inspire a more substantial combinatorial approach to promote a quicker recovery for patients with restorative impairments.

[1]  P. Podulka Comparisons of envelope morphological filtering methods and various regular algorithms for surface texture analysis , 2023, Metrology and Measurement Systems.

[2]  G. Trykowski,et al.  TiO2/HA and Titanate/HA Double-Layer Coatings on Ti6Al4V Surface and Their Influence on In Vitro Cell Growth and Osteogenic Potential , 2022, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[3]  M. Maglione,et al.  Assessing the Efficacy of Whole-Body Titanium Dental Implant Surface Modifications in Inducing Adhesion, Proliferation, and Osteogenesis in Human Adipose Tissue Stem Cells , 2022, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[4]  G. Shaw,et al.  Regenerative and Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Regularly Fed, Starved Cells and Extracellular Vesicles In Vivo , 2022, Cells.

[5]  Z. Ormianer,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Strain Transmitted through Prostheses on Implants with Two Different Macro-Structures and Connection during Insertion and Loading Phase: An In Vitro Study , 2022, Materials.

[6]  R. Spelat,et al.  Understanding How Heart Metabolic Derangement Shows Differential Stage Specificity for Heart Failure with Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction , 2022, Biomolecules.

[7]  R. Schmelzeisen,et al.  Impurities in commercial titanium dental implants - A mass and optical emission spectrometry elemental analysis. , 2022, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  Shota Yamada,et al.  Surface modification of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for bone regeneration by controlling their surface hydration and protein adsorption states. , 2022, Dalton transactions.

[9]  J. Zhang,et al.  Promoting osseointegration of titanium implants through magnesium- and strontium-doped hierarchically structured coating , 2021, Journal of Materials Research and Technology.

[10]  G. Marenzi,et al.  Effect of Implant Surface Roughness and Macro- and Micro-Structural Composition on Wear and Metal Particles Released , 2021, Materials.

[11]  A. Pandit,et al.  Therapies to prevent post-infarction remodelling: From repair to regeneration. , 2021, Biomaterials.

[12]  S. Spriano,et al.  Titanium and Protein Adsorption: An Overview of Mechanisms and Effects of Surface Features , 2021, Materials.

[13]  A. Biondi,et al.  Dental Pulp Stem Cells on Implant Surface: An In Vitro Study , 2021, BioMed research international.

[14]  Yong Huang,et al.  Improved osseointegration of 3D printed Ti-6Al-4V implant with a hierarchical micro/nano surface topography: An in vitro and in vivo study. , 2021, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[15]  Y. Lai,et al.  Hydroxyapatite-modified micro/nanostructured titania surfaces with different crystalline phases for osteoblast regulation , 2020, Bioactive materials.

[16]  W. Zambuzzi,et al.  The Impact of Bioactive Surfaces in the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vitro Comparative Study Evaluating the HAnano® and SLActive® Super Hydrophilic Surfaces , 2020, BioMed research international.

[17]  C. Grandini,et al.  Surface roughness of titanium disks influences the adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of osteogenic properties derived from human , 2020, International Journal of Implant Dentistry.

[18]  A. Madfa,et al.  Improvements in Clinical Durability From Functional Biomimetic Metallic Dental Implants , 2020, Frontiers in Materials.

[19]  S. David,et al.  Contamination of titanium dental implants: a narrative review , 2020, SN Applied Sciences.

[20]  J. Jansen,et al.  Mechanical aspects of dental implants and osseointegration: A narrative review. , 2020, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[21]  Y. Sugita,et al.  A Newly Created Meso-, Micro-, and Nano-Scale Rough Titanium Surface Promotes Bone-Implant Integration , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[22]  S. Armes,et al.  A worm gel-based 3D model to elucidate the paracrine interaction between multiple myeloma and mesenchymal stem cells , 2020, Materials today. Bio.

[23]  G. Shaw,et al.  Survival/Adaptation of Bone Marrow‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells After Long‐Term Starvation Through Selective Processes , 2019, Stem cells.

[24]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces. , 2019, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[25]  G. Seymour,et al.  Effect of Titanium Surfaces on the Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells. , 2018, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[26]  R. Luca,et al.  Chemical and Morphologic Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants: X-ray Photoemission Techniques (XPS) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with EDX Analysis , 2018 .

[27]  J. Koak,et al.  Effects of fluoride-modified titanium surfaces with the similar roughness on RUNX2 gene expression of osteoblast-like MG63 cells. , 2017, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[28]  Wei Ma,et al.  Enhanced osseointegration of titanium implants in a rat model of osteoporosis using multilayer bone mesenchymal stem cell sheets , 2017, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[29]  R. Miron,et al.  Basis of bone metabolism around dental implants during osseointegration and peri-implant bone loss. , 2017, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[30]  J. Helms,et al.  Effects of Condensation on Peri-implant Bone Density and Remodeling , 2017, Journal of dental research.

[31]  A. Ishisaki,et al.  Water-soluble factors eluated from surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer filler promote osteoblastic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells , 2017, Molecular medicine reports.

[32]  K. Yamashita,et al.  Surface free energy predominates in cell adhesion to hydroxyapatite through wettability. , 2016, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[33]  D. Botticelli,et al.  Sequential Healing at Calcium- versus Calcium Phosphate-Modified Titanium Implant Surfaces: An Experimental Study in Dogs. , 2016, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[34]  N. Lang,et al.  Sequential healing events of osseointegration at UnicCa(®) and SLActive(®) implant surfaces: an experimental study in the dog. , 2016, Clinical oral implants research.

[35]  H Han Haitjema,et al.  Uncertainty in measurement of surface topography , 2015, Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties.

[36]  Arnold Gillner,et al.  Surface topography enhances differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards osteogenic and adipogenic lineages. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[37]  E. Pow,et al.  Effect of Fluoride-Modified Titanium Surface on Early Adhesion of Irradiated Osteoblasts , 2015, BioMed research international.

[38]  I. Schechter,et al.  Cellular Responses Evoked by Different Surface Characteristics of Intraosseous Titanium Implants , 2015, BioMed research international.

[39]  Mohammad Haeri,et al.  ImageJ Plugin for Analysis of Porous Scaffolds used in Tissue Engineering , 2015 .

[40]  Yong Yang,et al.  Nanotopography Alters Nuclear Protein Expression, Proliferation and Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells , 2014, PloS one.

[41]  Shannon C. Gott,et al.  Bone marrow stromal cell adhesion and morphology on micro- and sub-micropatterned titanium. , 2014, Journal of biomedical nanotechnology.

[42]  C. Beltrami,et al.  Stem Cells , Tissue Engineering , and Hematopoetic Elements Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cell in Vitro Differentiation in a Three-Dimensional Dental Bud Structure , 2011 .

[43]  R. Rullo,et al.  Biological response of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to fluoride-modified titanium surfaces. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[44]  Yimin Zhao,et al.  The performance of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell--implant complexes prepared by cell sheet engineering techniques. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[45]  P. Krebsbach,et al.  Osterix Enhances BMSC-associated Osseointegration of Implants , 2009, Journal of dental research.

[46]  C. Susin,et al.  Bone healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[47]  L. Cooper,et al.  The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of TiO2 grit blasted titanium implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivo. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[48]  J. A. Currey,et al.  Effect of mechanical stimuli on skeletal regeneration around implants. , 2007, Bone.

[49]  A. Méndez-Vilas,et al.  On the relationship between common amplitude surface roughness parameters and surface area: Implications for the study of cell–material interactions , 2007 .

[50]  I. Karoussis,et al.  A comprehensive and critical review of dental implant placement in diabetic animals and patients. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[51]  Pierre Hardouin,et al.  Quantitative kinetic analysis of gene expression during human osteoblastic adhesion on orthopaedic materials. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[52]  A. Holmen,et al.  Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[53]  J. Ong,et al.  Protein adsorption and osteoblast precursor cell attachment to hydroxyapatite of different crystallinities. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[54]  Teruo Okano,et al.  [Cell sheet engineering]. , 2004, Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology.

[55]  M. Yoshinari,et al.  Substrate affects the initial attachment and subsequent behavior of human osteoblastic cells (Saos-2). , 2001, Biomaterials.

[56]  H. M. Kim,et al.  Alkali- and heat-treated porous titanium for orthopedic implants. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[57]  J. Aubin,et al.  Aluminum Accelerates Osteoblastic Differentiation But is Cytotoxic in Long-Term Rat Calvaria Cell Cultures , 1999, Calcified Tissue International.

[58]  A. Frassetto,et al.  Ultrasonic Instrument Effects on Different Implant Surfaces: Profilometry, Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy, and Microbiology In Vitro Study. , 2021, The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants.

[59]  Richard K. Leach,et al.  Practical estimation of measurement noise and flatness deviation on focus variation microscopes , 2014 .

[60]  M. Muñoz-Torres,et al.  [Cardiovascular disease and bone metabolism]. , 2011, Endocrinologia y nutricion : organo de la Sociedad Espanola de Endocrinologia y Nutricion.