Ties to the Past in Organization Research: A Comparative Analysis of Retrospective Methods

This paper addresses a traditionally neglected area of management and organizational studies—retrospective research. It identifies, describes and analyses four positions on retrospective research: Controlling the Past, in which attempts are made to maximize accurate recall or to reveal potential sources of error or bias; Interpreting the Past, in which understanding of the present is informed by the construction of past reality; Co-opting the Past, in which causal explanations link the past and the present; and Representing the Past, which involves the problematization of time and research on time. These positions are compared in terms of, for example, method, philosophy, examplars and potential contribution. Finally, implications are drawn for the practice of retrospective research in management and organization studies.

[1]  K. Gergen.  Social Psychology as History , 1973 .

[2]  H. Tsoukas.  The Validity of Idiographic Research Explanations , 1989 .

[3]  H. Willmott.  STRENGTH IS IGNORANCE; SLAVERY IS FREEDOM: MANAGING CULTURE IN MODERN ORGANIZATIONS* , 1993 .

[4]  Sally Blount,et al.  When Plans Change: Examining How People Evaluate Timing Changes in Work Organizations , 2001 .

[5]  N. Blaikie.  A critique of the use of triangulation in social research , 1991 .

[6]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Relativity Without Relativism: Reflexivity in Post-Paradigm Organization Studies , 1997 .

[7]  J. Hassard.  Essai: Organizational Time: Modern, Symbolic and Postmodern Reflections , 2002 .

[8]  Robert Chia,et al.  Essai : Thirty Years On: From Organizational Structures to the Organization of Thought , 1997 .

[9]  D. Barry,et al.  Strategy Retold: Toward a Narrative View of Strategic Discourse , 1997 .

[10]  John Hassard,et al.  The Invention of Corporate Culture: A History of the Histories of Cadbury , 1993 .

[11]  Managing change at Sears: a sideways look at a tale of corporate transformation , 2005 .

[12]  Peter Draper,et al.  Reflexive methodology – new vistas for qualitative research , 2001 .

[13]  Mary T. Curren,et al.  "I knew we would win": hindsight bias for favorable and unfavorable team decision outcomes. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  G. Burrell.  Pandemonium: Towards a Retro-Organization Theory , 1997 .

[15]  J. Cox,et al.  Unravelling Woomera: lip sewing, morphology and dystopia , 2004 .

[16]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  Organizational Identity and Learning: A Psychodynamic Perspective , 2000 .

[17]  Martin Parker.  Post-Modern Organizations or Postmodern Organization Theory? , 1992 .

[18]  A. Shupe,et al.  Atrocity tales, the Unification Church, and the social construction of evil. , 1979, The Journal of communication.

[19]  M. Sprangers.  Subject bias and the retrospective pretest in retrospect , 1989 .

[20]  Florence Allard-Poesi.  The Paradox of Sensemaking in Organizational Analysis , 2005 .

[21]  Alfred Kieser,et al.  Introduction: History in Organisation Studies , 2004 .

[22]  Pasquale Gagliardi,et al.  Exploring the Aesthetic Side of Organizational Life , 1999 .

[23]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL SYMBOLISM AND IDEOLOGY , 1991 .

[24]  H. Lawson.  Reflexivity: The Post-Modern Predicament , 1986 .

[25]  Edwin A. Fleishman,et al.  PATTERNS OF LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOR RELATED TO EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCES AND TURNOVER , 1962 .

[26]  Paul Jeffcutt,et al.  THE INTERPRETATION OF ORGANIZATION: A CONTEMPORARY ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE* , 1994 .

[27]  K. Weick.  Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .

[28]  B. Golden.  The past is the past--or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[29]  J. Hassard,et al.  Researching Foucault's Research: Organization and Control in Joseph Lancaster's Monitorial Schools , 2002 .

[30]  G. Burrell,et al.  Modernism, Postmodernism and Organizational Analysis: An Introduction , 1988 .

[31]  M van Gils,et al.  Organizational analysis as deconstructive practice , 1999 .

[32]  Mihaela Kelemen,et al.  Multiparadigm Inquiry: Exploring Organizational Pluralism and Paradox , 2002 .

[33]  P. Callery,et al.  Enhancing the Rigor of Grounded Theory: Incorporating Reflexivity and Relationality , 2001, Qualitative health research.

[34]  Kenneth P. De Meuse,et al.  An Investigation of the Relational Component of the Psychological Contract across Time, Generation, and Employment Status , 2001 .

[35]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[36]  Tom Keenoy,et al.  Discourse and Organization , 1998 .

[37]  Antonio Strati,et al.  Organization and Aesthetics , 1999 .

[38]  B. Jackson.  The Goose that Laid the Golden Egg?: A Rhetorical Critique of Stephen Covey and the Effectiveness Movement , 1999 .

[39]  Ralph Flores,et al.  Telling Stories: Postmodernism and the Invalidation of Traditional Narrative , 1995 .

[40]  W. Thomas,et al.  The Unadjusted Girl , 1924 .

[41]  David Grant,et al.  The Sage handbook of organizational discourse , 2004 .

[42]  L. Millward,et al.  Organizational Research Methods , 2001 .

[43]  R. Morrison.  Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist , 1936 .

[44]  J. Busby.  The Effectiveness of Collective Retrospection as a Mechanism of Organizational Learning , 1999 .

[45]  A. Pettigrew.  On Studying Organizational Cultures , 1979 .

[46]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Stories of Suffering: Subjective Tales and Research Narratives , 1999 .

[47]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  Taking Time to Integrate Temporal Research , 2001 .

[48]  David M. Boje,et al.  STORIES OF THE STORYTELLING ORGANIZATION: A POSTMODERN ANALYSIS OF DISNEY AS "TAMARA-LAND" , 1995 .

[49]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. , 1975 .

[50]  Catherine Casey.  “Come, Join Our Family”: Discipline and Integration in Corporate Organizational Culture , 1999 .

[51]  Bernard M. Bass,et al.  Handbook of Leadership , 1990 .

[52]  Barbara Czarniawska.  A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies , 1998 .

[53]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Critical Theory and Postmodernism Approaches to Organization Studies , 1996 .

[54]  K. Gergen.  Psychological science in a postmodern context. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[55]  Stephen Linstead,et al.  The Aesthetics of Organization , 2000 .

[56]  B. Golden.  Further Remarks on Retrospective Accounts on Organizational and Strategic Management Research , 1997 .

[57]  K. Gergen,et al.  Organization Science as Social Construction: Postmodern Potentials , 1996 .

[58]  R. Hodgetts,et al.  Frederick W. Taylor'S 1899 Pig Iron Observations: Examining Fact, Fiction, And Lessons For The New Millennium , 2000 .

[59]  N. Blaikie.  Approaches to Social Enquiry , 1993 .

[60]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction , 1997 .

[61]  R. Bhaskar.  Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation , 1986 .

[62]  Paul DiMaggio.  Comment on "What Theory is Not." , 1995 .

[63]  Mark J. Martinko,et al.  A Synthesis and Extension of the Weiner and Kelley Attribution Models , 1998 .

[64]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  Doomed to Failure: Narratives of Inevitability and Conspiracy in a Failed IS Project , 1998 .

[65]  K. Weick.  What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .

[66]  H. Spiro.  The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics , 1996 .

[67]  A. Giddens.  Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , 1992, The New Social Theory Reader.

[68]  B. Doolin.  Narratives of Change: Discourse, Technology and Organization , 2003 .

[69]  B. Weiner.  An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. , 1985, Psychological review.

[70]  Richard M. Weiss.  Taking Science out of Organization Science: How Would Postmodernism Reconstruct the Analysis of Organizations? , 2000 .

[71]  B. Fischoff.  Hindsight (Not Equal To) Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty. , 1975 .

[72]  A. Pettigrew.  The politics of organizational decision-making , 1973 .

[73]  M. Alvesson.  Doing critical management research , 2000 .

[74]  D. Macbeth,et al.  On “Reflexivity” in Qualitative Research: Two Readings, and a Third , 2001 .

[75]  B. Massumi,et al.  The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge , 1979 .

[76]  C. Whitbeck,et al.  A Realist Theory of Science. , 1977 .

[77]  Postmodernism and Action , 1996 .

[78]  M. Foucault.  The archaeology of knowledge , 1970 .

[79]  Andrew Watson,et al.  Critical realism and constructivism in strategy research: Toward a synthesis , 2001 .

[80]  J. Hassard.  Commodification, construction and compression: a review of time metaphors in organizational analysis , 2001 .

[81]  Eric W. K. Tsang,et al.  Realism and constructivism in strategy research: a critical realist response to Mir and Watson , 2001 .

[82]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[83]  G. Gutting.  The archaeology of knowledge , 1989 .

[84]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  RETROSPECTIVE REPORTS IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH: A REEXAMINATION OF RECENT EVIDENCE , 1997 .

[85]  Richard Marsden.  The Politics of Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[86]  M. Archer.  The Dubious Guarantees of Social Science , 1998 .

[87]  Haridimos Tsouw.  REFINING COMMON SENSE: TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE IN MANAGEMENT STUDIES* , 1994 .

[88]  Eric Abrahamson,et al.  The Emergence And Prevalence Of Employee Management Rhetorics: The Effects Of Long Waves, Labor Unions, And Turnover, 1875 To 1992 , 1997 .

[89]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[90]  A. Kieser.  Rhetoric and Myth in Management Fashion , 1997 .

[91]  D. Boje.  Narrative methods for organizational and communication research , 2001 .

[92]  Jeanette Winterson.  Sexing the Cherry , 1989 .

[93]  David J. Will.  A realist theory of science , 1981, Medical History.

[94]  S. Deetz.  Crossroads---Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and Their Legacy , 1996 .

[95]  J. Cox.  Manufacturing the Past: Loss and Absence in Organizational Change , 1997 .

[96]  A. Schutz.  The phenomenology of the social world , 1967 .

[97]  L. Smircich,et al.  Past Postmodernism? Reflections and Tentative Directions , 1999 .

[98]  A. Bryman.  Quantity and quality in social research , 1988 .

[99]  David R. Cannon.  Cause or Control? , 1999 .

[100]  J. Harvey,et al.  Perspectives on attributional processes , 1981 .

[101]  Alfred Kieser,et al.  From Asceticism to Administration of Wealth. Medieval Monasteries and the Pitfalls of Rationalization , 1987 .

[102]  B. Weiner,et al.  Perceiving the Causes of Success and Failure , 1989 .

[103]  Michael Ivor Reed,et al.  Organization, Trust and Control: A Realist Analysis , 2001 .

[104]  Stanley Houston,et al.  Beyond Social Constructionism: Critical Realism and Social Work , 2001 .

[105]  J. March,et al.  Learning from Samples of One or Fewer , 1991 .

[106]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[107]  P. Pettit.  The Possibility of Naturalism. , 1981 .

[108]  Robert Cheng Huat Chia,et al.  Organizational Analysis as Deconstructive Practice , 1996 .

[109]  B. McKelvey.  Perspective—Quasi-Natural Organization Science , 1997 .

[110]  Lynn A. Isabella.  Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds: How Managers Construe Key Organizational Events , 1990 .

[111]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Social attributions and social representations , 1995 .

[112]  J. Cox,et al.  Crafting Organization , 2002 .

[113]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[114]  Arthur W. Frank,et al.  The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics , 1995 .

[115]  M. Sprangers.  Response shift and the retrospective pretest : on the usefulness of retrospective pretest-posttest designs in detecting training related response shifts , 1988 .

[116]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Narrative Methods for Organizational and Communication Research , 2003 .