A six-layer architecture for the digital twin: a manufacturing case study implementation

Industry 4.0, cyber-physical production systems (CPPS) and the Internet of Things (IoT) are current focusses in automation and data exchange in manufacturing, arising from the rapid increase in capabilities in information and communication technologies and the ubiquitous internet. A key enabler for the advances promised by CPPSs is the concept of a digital twin , which is the virtual representation of a real-world entity, or the physical twin . An important step towards the success of Industry 4.0 is the establishment of practical reference architectures. This paper presents an architecture for such a digital twin, which enables the exchange of data and information between a remote emulation or simulation and the physical twin. The architecture comprises different layers, including a local data layer, an IoT Gateway layer, cloud-based databases and a layer containing emulations and simulations. The architecture can be implemented in new and legacy production facilities, with a minimal disruption of current installations. This architecture provides a service-based and real-time enabled infrastructure for vertical and horizontal integration. To evaluate the architecture, it was implemented for a small, but typical, physical manufacturing system component.

[1]  Paulo Leitão,et al.  Industrial automation based on cyber-physical systems technologies: Prototype implementations and challenges , 2016, Comput. Ind..

[2]  Carlos Eduardo Pereira,et al.  Digital Twin Data Modeling with AutomationML and a Communication Methodology for Data Exchange , 2016 .

[3]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Digital Twins and Cyber–Physical Systems toward Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: Correlation and Comparison , 2019, Engineering.

[4]  Theodor Borangiu,et al.  Embedded Digital Twin for ARTI-Type Control of Semi-continuous Production Processes , 2019, SOHOMA.

[5]  Jay Lee,et al.  A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems , 2015 .

[6]  Wilfried Sihn,et al.  Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification , 2018 .

[7]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering , 2017 .

[8]  Yu Peng,et al.  Review on cyber-physical systems , 2017, IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica.

[9]  Octavian Morariu,et al.  Integrating the Digital Twin of a Shop Floor Conveyor in the Manufacturing Control System , 2019, SOHOMA.

[10]  Ercan Öztemel,et al.  Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies , 2018, J. Intell. Manuf..

[11]  KarnouskosStamatis,et al.  Human Factors in Industrial Automation based on Cyber Physical Systems Technologies , 2016 .

[12]  Karel Kruger,et al.  A Six-Layer Digital Twin Architecture for a Manufacturing Cell , 2018, SOHOMA.

[13]  Edward A. Lee,et al.  Introduction to Embedded Systems - A Cyber-Physical Systems Approach , 2013 .

[14]  Ján Vachálek,et al.  The digital twin of an industrial production line within the industry 4.0 concept , 2017, 2017 21st International Conference on Process Control (PC).

[15]  Giovanni Cutuli,et al.  Performance evaluation of OPC UA , 2010, 2010 IEEE 15th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2010).

[16]  Helen Gill,et al.  Cyber-Physical Systems , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM).

[17]  Fei Tao,et al.  Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data , 2017, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[18]  Edward A. Lee The Past, Present and Future of Cyber-Physical Systems: A Focus on Models , 2015, Sensors.

[19]  John Soldatos,et al.  The Digital Shopfloor: Industrial Automation in the Industry 4.0 Era , 2019, The Digital Shopfloor: Industrial Automation in the Industry 4.0 Era.

[20]  Jeff Morgan,et al.  Cyber physical process monitoring systems , 2015, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[21]  Maharshi Harshadbhai Dhada,et al.  Multi-agent system architectures for collaborative prognostics , 2019, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[22]  Patel Kt,et al.  Documentation and Records: Harmonized GMP Requirements , 2011 .

[23]  Soundar R. T. Kumara,et al.  Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing , 2016 .

[24]  Zilvinas Nakutis,et al.  Round-Trip Delay Estimation in OPC UA Server-Client Communication Channel , 2016 .

[25]  Ferdinando Chiacchio,et al.  To OPC UA Client OPC UA Server Server Application OPC UA Communication Stack OPC UA Server API From OPC UA Client From OPC UA Client To OPC UA Client Request Message OPC , 2013 .

[26]  Karel Kruger,et al.  A Six-Layer Architecture for Digital Twins with Aggregation , 2019, SOHOMA.