Dissemination of precision farming in Germany: acceptance, adoption, obstacles, knowledge transfer and training activities

The adoption of precision farming (PF) was studied on the basis of personal interviews conducted at several agricultural exhibitions in Germany. Between 6.65% and 11% of the interviewed farmers used PF. The majority used data collection techniques such as GPS-based area measurement and soil sampling rather than variable rate application techniques such as site-specific sowing and fertilising. Roughly half the farmers interviewed knew about PF. About 7–10% of them intended to start using PF in the future. The results indicated that a large number of farmers did not even know what PF meant. In order to get more insight into this situation, several interviews were conducted with farmers already using PF techniques. A further study in 2005 of PF education in Germany indicated that, especially at vocational and technical schools, the subject was only covered to a small extent although the aim was to give a better coverage in future. At higher education levels, such as at universities and technical colleges, the teaching of PF was clearly better established. In order to promote awareness of PF among farmers, information and teaching materials adapted to the relevant educational levels were developed and tried out at training events. The main topics addressed were parallel tracking systems, site-specific nitrogen fertilising, yield mapping in grain production and the use of PDAs in crop farming. Finally, preliminary survey results are presented showing how knowledge about PF can best lead to its adoption and transfer into daily practice.

[1]  S. Blackmore,et al.  The Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Trends in Yield Map Data over Six Years , 2003 .

[2]  P. C. Robert,et al.  Information sources and decision making on precision farming. , 2003 .

[3]  Stan G. Daberkow,et al.  Farm and Operator Characteristics Affecting the Awareness and Adoption of Precision Agriculture Technologies in the US , 2003, Precision Agriculture.

[4]  S. Fountas,et al.  Farmer Experience with Precision Agriculture in Denmark and the US Eastern Corn Belt , 2005, Precision Agriculture.

[5]  Arlene Fink,et al.  How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide. Sixth Edition. , 1985 .

[6]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  Adoption and perspective of precision farming (PF) in Germany: results of several surveys among the different agricultural target groups. , 2007 .

[7]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[8]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[9]  M. Reichardt,et al.  Adoption and future perspective of precision farming in Germany: results of several surveys among different agricultural target groups , 2009, Precision Agriculture.

[10]  J. Pedersen,et al.  Adoption and perspectives of precision farming in Denmark , 2004 .

[11]  Søren Marcus Pedersen,et al.  A comparison of producer adoption of precision agricultural practices in Denmark, the United Kingdom and The United States , 2001 .

[12]  P. Hill,et al.  Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung , 1992 .

[13]  Bernad Batinic,et al.  Validierung und Normierung des Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Trendsetting (TDS) , 2006 .

[14]  G. Probst,et al.  Wissen managen-wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen , 1998 .

[15]  J. Stafford,et al.  Acceptance of precision agriculture in Germany - results of a survey in 2001. , 2003 .

[16]  Lorraine Carter,et al.  How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide , 2010 .

[17]  Martin Kunisch,et al.  agroXML Enabling Standardized, Platform-Independent Internet Data Exchange in Farm Management Information Systems , 2007, MTSR.