A shape memory alloy-based reusable hysteretic damper for seismic hazard mitigation

This paper presents a special shape memory alloy-based hysteretic damper with distinctive features such as tunable hysteretic behavior and ability to withstand several design level earthquakes. Superelastic nitinol stranded wires are used for energy dissipation in this damping device, termed a reusable hysteretic damper (RHD). By adjusting its design parameters, the hysteretic behavior of the RHD can be modified to best fit the needs for passive structural control applications. Adjustable design parameters of the RHD include the inclination angle of the nitinol wires, pretension level, and friction effect. A simulation-based parametric study was carried out to examine the effects of these design parameters of the RHD on its energy dissipating performance. The effectiveness of the RHD in passive seismic response control of civil engineering structures is examined through a nonlinear dynamic analysis of a three-story steel frame building with and without an RHD. The simulation results suggest that it can effectively reduce the structural response of building structures subjected to strong earthquakes. With proper design, an RHD can be reused for several strong earthquakes without the need for repair, due to the high fatigue life of nitinol wires.

[1]  Tomoyuki Kakeshita,et al.  Science and Technology of Shape-Memory Alloys: New Developments , 2002 .

[2]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Steel Beam-Column Connections using Shape Memory Alloys , 2004 .

[3]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  CYCLIC PROPERTIES OF SUPERELASTIC SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY WIRES AND BARS , 2004 .

[4]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Experimental and analytical studies of shape-memory alloy dampers for structural control , 1995, Smart Structures.

[5]  Paolo Clemente,et al.  Demo-application of shape memory alloy devices: the rehabilitation of the S. Giorgio Church bell tower , 2001, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[6]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Unseating prevention for multiple frame bridges using superelastic devices , 2005 .

[7]  T. Tadaki,et al.  Shape Memory Alloys , 2002 .

[8]  C. Valente,et al.  Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems , 2005 .

[9]  Jack R. Hayes,et al.  Structural damping with shape-memory alloys: one class of devices , 1995, Smart Structures.

[10]  Christoph Czaderski,et al.  Applications of shape memory alloys in civil engineering structures—Overview, limits and new ideas , 2005 .

[11]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark Control Problems for Seismically Excited Nonlinear Buildings , 2004 .

[12]  John C. Wilson,et al.  Shape Memory Alloys for Seismic Response Modification: A State-of-the-Art Review , 2005 .

[13]  Maurizio Indirli,et al.  Progress of application, research and development, and design guidelines for shape memory alloy devices for cultural heritage structures in Italy , 2001, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[14]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys , 2000 .

[15]  DONATELLO GARDONE,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF R/C FRAMES RETROFITTED WITH DISSIPATING AND RE-CENTRING BRACES , 2004 .

[16]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic retrofit of simply supported bridges using shape memory alloys , 2002 .

[17]  E. J. Graesser,et al.  Shape‐Memory Alloys as New Materials for Aseismic Isolation , 1991 .

[18]  Krzysztof Wilde,et al.  Base isolation system with shape memory alloy device for elevated highway bridges , 2000 .