Estimation of a three-dimensional tyre footprint using dynamic soil–tyre contact pressures

Abstract A method for estimating the three-dimensional (3D) footprint of a 16.9R38 pneumatic tyre was developed. The method was based on measured values of contact pressure at the soil–tyre interface and wheel contact length determined from the contact pressures and the depths and widths of ruts formed in the soil. The 3D footprint was investigated in an area of the field where the pressure sensors of the tyre passed in a soft clay soil. The tyre was instrumented with six miniature pressure sensors, three on the lug face and the remaining three on the under-tread region between two lugs. The instrumented tyre was run at a constant forward speed of 0.27 m/s and 23% slip on a soft soil, 0.48 MPa cone index, 25.6% d.b. moisture content for four wheel load and tyre pressure combination treatments. The 3D footprint assessment derived from soil–tyre interface stress used in this research is a unique methodology, which could precisely relate the trend profile of the 3D footprint to the measured rut depth. The tyre–soil interface contact pressure distributions results showed that as inflation pressure increased the soil strength increased significantly near the centre of the tyre as a compaction increase sensed with the cone penetrometer.

[1]  Hiroshi Nakashima,et al.  Algorithm and implementation of soil–tire contact analysis code based on dynamic FE–DE method , 2004 .

[2]  Eddie C. Burt,et al.  Dynamic load and inflation pressure effects on contact pressures of a forestry forwarder tire , 2004 .

[3]  D. C. Erbach,et al.  Inflation pressure effect on soil compaction , 1992 .

[4]  A. C. Bailey,et al.  Load and Inflation Pressure Effects on Tires , 1982 .

[5]  Itzhak Shmulevich,et al.  Tire footprint characteristics as a function of soil properties and tire operations , 1995 .

[6]  B. D. Soane,et al.  Soil compaction in crop production , 1994 .

[7]  J. M. Duncan,et al.  Nonlinear Analysis of Stress and Strain in Soils , 1970 .

[8]  Eddie C. Burt,et al.  Some Comparisons of Average to Peak Soil-Tire Contact Pressures , 1992 .

[9]  Eddie C. Burt,et al.  The effects of reduced inflation pressure on soil-tire interface stresses and soil strength , 1995 .

[10]  Klaus Augsburg,et al.  Evaluation of tire contact properties using nondestructive testing. Part 2: Experimental determination and fuzzy model of the contact parch in the static state , 2008 .

[11]  E. H. Sakai,et al.  Measurement and Visualization of the Contact Pressure Distribution of Rubber Disks and Tires , 1995 .

[12]  Takashi Tanaka,et al.  Soil compaction by multiple passes of a rigid wheel relevant for optimization of traffic , 1989 .

[13]  Tadashi Kishimoto,et al.  THREE-DIRECTIONAL CONTACT STRESS DISTRIBUTIONS FOR A PNEUMATIC TRACTOR TIRE IN SOFT SOIL , 1998 .

[14]  Shane Ward,et al.  On-the-Move Monitoring of Soil-Tire Interaction on Soft Soil Using Wireless Data Acquisition , 2007 .

[15]  Eddie C. Burt,et al.  Effects of Dynamic Load on Normal Soil-Tire Interface Stresses , 1990 .

[16]  Tadashi Kishimoto,et al.  Interface Pressures of a Tractor Drive Tyre on Structured and Loose Soils , 2004 .

[17]  R. Lal Kushwaha,et al.  Distributed Soil Displacement Associated with Surface Loading , 2003 .

[18]  Eddie C. Burt,et al.  Inflation Pressure and Dynamic Load Effects on Soil Deformation and Soil-tire Interface Stresses , 1995 .

[19]  Ahmad Mohsenimanesh,et al.  Modelling of pneumatic tractor tyre interaction with multi-layered soil , 2009 .