Dynamic Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Simulation of Mitral Repair

Objective Planned mitral repair strategies are generally established from preoperative echocardiography; however, specific details of the repair are often determined intraoperatively. We propose that three-dimensional printed, patient-specific, dynamic mitral valve models may help surgeons plan and trial all the details of a specific patient's mitral repair preoperatively. Methods Using preoperative echocardiography, segmentation, modeling software, and three-dimensional printing, we created dynamic, high-fidelity, patient-specific mitral valve models including the subvalvular apparatus. We assessed the accuracy of 10 patient mitral valve models anatomically and functionally in a heart phantom simulator, both objectively by blinded echocardiographic assessment, and subjectively by two mitral repair experts. After this, we attempted model mitral repair and compared the outcomes with postoperative echocardiography. Results Model measurements were accurate when compared with patients on anterior-posterior diameter, circumference, and anterior leaflet length; however, less accurate on posterior leaflet length. On subjective assessment, Likert scores were high at 3.8 ± 0.4 and 3.4 ± 0.7, suggesting good fidelity of the dynamic model echocardiogram and functional model in the phantom to the preoperative three-dimensional echocardiogram, respectively. Mitral repair was successful in all 10 models with significant reduction in mitral insufficiency. In two models, mitral repair was performed twice, using two different surgical techniques to assess which provided a better outcome. When compared with the actual patient mitral repair outcome, the repaired models compared favorably. Conclusions Complex mitral valve modeling seems to predict an individual patient's mitral anatomy well, before surgery. Further investigation is required to determine whether deliberate preoperative practice can improve mitral repair outcomes.

[1]  Martin Misfeld,et al.  Learning Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Cumulative Sum Sequential Probability Analysis of 3895 Operations From a Single High-Volume Center , 2013, Circulation.

[2]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation: best practice revolution , 2010, European heart journal.

[3]  C. Vassileva,et al.  Long-term Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair Versus Replacement for Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review , 2014, Current cardiology reviews.

[4]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Influence of Hospital Procedural Volume on Care Process and Mortality for Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation , 2007, Circulation.

[5]  J. Gorman,et al.  Posterior leaflet augmentation in ischemic mitral regurgitation increases leaflet coaptation and mobility. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  Catherine M. Otto,et al.  Complications of prosthetic heart valves , 2004, Current cardiology reports.

[7]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  Dynamic heart phantom with functional mitral and aortic valves , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[8]  J. Grapsa,et al.  Surgical management of valvular heart disease , 2010 .

[9]  Frederick J Schoen,et al.  Calcification of tissue heart valve substitutes: progress toward understanding and prevention. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  A. Pipe,et al.  Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. , 2004, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[11]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  Patient-specific indirectly 3D printed mitral valves for pre-operative surgical modelling , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[12]  S. Markwell,et al.  Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term survival following repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation. , 2011, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[13]  J. Gorman,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasound-derived physical mitral valve modeling. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  John Chambers,et al.  Mitral valve repair for severe mitral regurgitation: the way forward? , 2006, European heart journal.

[15]  T. Guy,et al.  Mitral valve prolapse. , 2012, Annual review of medicine.

[16]  Min Gao,et al.  Outcome of Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: A Comparison by Propensity Score Analysis , 2003, Circulation.

[17]  J. Maessen,et al.  Preoperative planning with three-dimensional reconstruction of patient's anatomy, rapid prototyping and simulation for endoscopic mitral valve repair. , 2016, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[18]  W. Manning,et al.  Three-dimensional printing of mitral valve using echocardiographic data. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[19]  Willem Flameng,et al.  Recurrence of Mitral Valve Regurgitation After Mitral Valve Repair in Degenerative Valve Disease , 2003, Circulation.

[20]  W. Williams,et al.  Surgical management of valvular heart disease 2004. , 2004, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[21]  M. Antunes,et al.  Long-term results of mitral valve surgery for degenerative anterior leaflet or bileaflet prolapse: analysis of negative factors for repair, early and late failures, and survival. , 2016, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[22]  L. Cohn,et al.  Mitral valve repair versus replacement in the elderly: short-term and long-term outcomes. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  P. Shah,et al.  Current concepts in mitral valve prolapse--diagnosis and management. , 2010, Journal of cardiology.

[24]  Gorav Ailawadi,et al.  Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement in elderly patients? , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[25]  N G Smedira,et al.  Durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[26]  J. Hartikainen,et al.  Mitral valve replacement versus repair: propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysis. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[27]  M. Mack,et al.  Mitral valve disease—current management and future challenges , 2016, The Lancet.

[28]  D. Adams,et al.  Survival and outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years. , 2015, JAMA.

[29]  S. Little,et al.  3D Printed Modeling for Patient-Specific Mitral Valve Intervention: Repair With a Clip and a Plug. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.