Determining leaf area index and leafy tree roughness using terrestrial laser scanning

[1] Vegetation roughness, and more specifically forest roughness, is a necessary component in better defining flood dynamics both in the sense of changes in river catchment characteristics and the dynamics of forest changes and management. Extracting roughness parameters from riparian forests can be a complicated process involving different components for different required scales and flow depths. For flow depths that enter a forest canopy, roughness at both the woody branch and foliage level is necessary. This study attempts to extract roughness for this leafy component using a relatively new remote sensing technique in the form of terrestrial laser scanning. Terrestrial laser scanning is used in this study due to its ability to obtain millions of points within relatively small forest stands. This form of lidar can be used to determine the gaps present in foliaged canopies in order to determine the leaf area index. The leaf area index can then be directly input into resistance equations to determine the flow resistance at different flow depths. Leaf area indices created using ground scanning are compared in this study to indices calculated using simple regressionequations.Thedominantriparianforestsinvestigatedinthisstudyareplantedand natural poplar forests over a lowland section of the Garonne River in Southern France. Final foliage roughness values were added to woody branch roughness from a previous study, resulting in total planted riparian forest roughness values of around Manning’s n = 0.170–0.195 and around n = 0.245–330 for in‐canopy flow of 6 and 8 m, respectively, and aroundn= 0.590 and aroundn= 0.750 for a natural forest stand at the same flow depths.

[1]  M. Villar,et al.  Productivity, leaf traits and carbon isotope discrimination in 29 Populus deltoides x P. nigra clones. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[2]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Mapping defoliation during a severe insect attack on Scots pine using airborne laser scanning , 2006 .

[3]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography , 2004 .

[4]  F. Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination: Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling , 2004 .

[5]  M. Weissa,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index ( LAI ) determination Part II . Estimation of LAI , errors and sampling , 2003 .

[6]  B. Gielen,et al.  Leaf area dynamics in a closed poplar plantation under free-air carbon dioxide enrichment. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[7]  Fu‐Chun Wu,et al.  Variation of Roughness Coefficients for Unsubmerged and Submerged Vegetation , 1999 .

[8]  P. Klinkhamer Plant allometry: The scaling of form and process , 1995 .

[9]  A. W. Western,et al.  An analysis of the influence of riparian vegetation on the propagation of flood waves , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  Alain Royer,et al.  Measuring Leaf Area Index with the Li‐Cor LAI‐2000 in Pine Stands , 1994 .

[11]  Kejun Yang,et al.  Flow Patterns in Compound Channels with Vegetated Floodplains , 2007 .

[12]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Plant photosynthetic production. Manual of methods. , 1971 .

[13]  Hsieh Wen Shen,et al.  Discussion and Closure: Variation of Roughness Coefficients for Unsubmerged and Submerged Vegetation , 2001 .

[14]  Benjamin Koetz,et al.  Forest Canopy Gap Fraction From Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2007, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[15]  Nicholas Kouwen,et al.  BIOMECHANICS OF VEGETATIVE CHANNEL LININGS , 1980 .

[16]  T. McMahon,et al.  Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  R. Bukowski,et al.  HIGH-DEFINITION SURVEYING ( HDS ) : A NEW ERA IN REALITY CAPTURE , 2004 .

[18]  E. Muller,et al.  Populus nigra L. en valle de Garonne: legs du pass et contraintes du prsent , 2002 .

[19]  C. Wessman,et al.  Canopy transmittance models for estimating forest leaf area index , 1993 .

[20]  V. T. Chow Open-channel hydraulics , 1959 .

[21]  James M. Vose,et al.  Seasonal changes of leaf area index (LAI) in a tropical deciduous forest in west Mexico , 1995 .

[22]  Vassilios A. Tsihrintzis,et al.  Discussion of "Variation of Roughness Coefficients for Unsubmerged and Submerged Vegetation" , 2001 .

[23]  Robert B. Jacobson,et al.  Woody vegetation and channel morphogenesis in low-gradient, gravel-bed streams in the Ozark Plateaus, Missouri and Arkansas , 1995 .

[24]  Stephen J. Mitchell,et al.  Wind tunnel measurements of crown streamlining and drag relationships for three conifer species , 2004 .

[25]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Leaf allometry in young poplar stands: reliability of leaf area index estimation, site and clone effects , 1993 .

[26]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Retrieval of forest structural parameters using a ground-based lidar instrument (Echidna®) , 2008 .

[27]  N. Kouwen,et al.  Friction Factors for Coniferous Trees along Rivers , 2000 .

[28]  M. H. Diskin EVALUATION OF SEGMENTED IUH FROM DERIVATIVES , 1969 .

[29]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Photosynthesis, leaf area and productivity of 5 poplar clones during their establishment year , 1994 .

[30]  M. Fathi-Maghadam,et al.  Nonrigid, Nonsubmerged, Vegetative Roughness on Floodplains , 1997 .

[31]  Harry L. Jenter,et al.  Drag coefficients for modeling flow through emergent vegetation in the Florida Everglades , 2004 .

[32]  Catherine Wilson,et al.  Open Channel Flow through Different Forms of Submerged Flexible Vegetation , 2003 .

[33]  M. Monsi Uber den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung fur die Stoffproduktion , 1953 .

[34]  Juha Järvelä,et al.  Flow resistance of flexible and stiff vegetation: a flume study with natural plants , 2002 .

[35]  P. J. Curran,et al.  Estimating the green leaf area index of grassland with airborne multispectral scanner data , 1987 .

[36]  V. R. Schneider,et al.  GUIDE FOR SELECTING MANNING'S ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS FOR NATURAL CHANNELS AND FLOOD PLAINS , 1989 .

[37]  A. Cutini,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index with the Li-Cor LAI 2000 in deciduous forests , 1998 .

[38]  Andrew P. Robinson,et al.  Leaf area index inferred from solar beam transmission in mixed conifer forests on complex terrain , 2003 .

[39]  J. Brasington,et al.  Leafless roughness of complex tree morphology using terrestrial lidar , 2009 .

[40]  J. Brasington,et al.  Retrieval of vegetative fluid resistance terms for rigid stems using airborne lidar. , 2008 .

[41]  N. Coops,et al.  Using airborne and ground-based ranging lidar to measure canopy structure in Australian forests , 2003 .

[42]  T. J. Dean,et al.  Estimating individual tree leaf area in loblolly pine plantations using LiDAR-derived measurements of height and crown dimensions , 2005 .

[43]  J. Järvelä Determination of flow resistance caused by non‐submerged woody vegetation , 2004 .

[44]  Lee A. Vierling,et al.  Use of a ground‐based scanning lidar for estimation of biophysical properties of western larch (Larix occidentalis) , 2007 .

[45]  J. Vose,et al.  Vertical leaf area distribution, light transmittance, and application of the Beer–Lambert Law in four mature hardwood stands in the southern Appalachians , 1995 .

[46]  S. Rodrigues,et al.  Flow and sediment dynamics in the vegetated secondary channels of an anabranching river: The Loire River (France) , 2006 .

[47]  E. Gregory McPherson,et al.  Evaluation of four methods for estimating leaf area of isolated trees , 2003 .

[48]  D. C. Goodrichb,et al.  Using airborne lidar to predict Leaf Area Index in cottonwood trees and refine riparian water-use estimates , 2007 .

[49]  M. Kabdaşli,et al.  The impact of single natural vegetation elements on flow characteristics , 2008 .

[50]  Iehisa Nezu,et al.  Hydrodynamic Behavior of Partly Vegetated Open Channels , 1996 .