Capacity building as an instrument of institutional reform: Improving the quality of higher education through academic audits in the UK, New Zealand, Sweden, and Hong Kong

Abstract As countries convert from state to market‐centered public policies, there is increasing interest in new forms of public accountability. Capacity building initiatives that reform institutional frameworks are useful policy instruments during this period of transition. What are the impacts and implementation problems characteristic of this approach? This article reviews the experience with “Academic Audit,” a capacity building accountability instrument for universities adopted in the UK, Sweden, New Zealand, and Hong Kong. Academic audits altered the incentives for cooperative behavior among faculty members to improve student learning. Identified implementation problems included: training for the new process, the uncertainty of capacity building benefits, and the central role of information.

[1]  D. Dill Higher education markets and public policy , 1997 .

[2]  Bjørn Stensaker,et al.  External Quality Auditing in Sweden: Are Departments Affected? , 1999 .

[3]  D. North,et al.  Elements of Reason: Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions , 1994 .

[4]  A. Howitt,et al.  Perspectives on management capacity building , 1987 .

[5]  Tony Becher Making Audit Acceptable: A Collegial Approach to Quality Assurance , 1992 .

[6]  W. Massy Teaching and Learning Quality‐process Review: the Hong Kong programme , 1997 .

[7]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research , 1992 .

[8]  Richard W. Moll The Scramble to get The New Class Is the Dean of Admissions Now Outside the Academy , 1994 .

[9]  Fred F. Harcleroad Educational Auditing and Accountability. , 1976 .

[10]  B. Clark,et al.  The Modern Integration of Research Activities with Teaching and Learning. , 1997 .

[11]  William F. Massy,et al.  Departmental Cultures and Teaching Quality: Overcoming “Hollowed” Collegiality , 1994 .

[12]  James S. Fairweather,et al.  Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life , 1995 .

[13]  Lisa R. Lattuca,et al.  Will Disciplinary Perspectives Impede Curricular Reform , 1994 .

[14]  D. Dill,et al.  Academic accountability and university adaptation: The architecture of an academic learning organization , 1999 .

[15]  P. D. Vries,et al.  Standards and quality in higher education , 1997 .

[16]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How college affects students : findings and insights from twenty years of research , 1992 .

[17]  William F. Massy,et al.  Life on the wired campus: how information technology will shape institutional futures , 1997 .

[18]  Merilee S. Grindle,et al.  Getting good government : capacity building in the public sectors of developing countries , 1997 .

[19]  Donald F. Kettl,et al.  The global revolution in public management: Driving themes, missing links , 1997 .

[20]  William F. Massy,et al.  Resource Allocation in Higher Education , 1996 .

[21]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[22]  Charles T. Clotfelter,et al.  Buying the Best: Cost Escalation in Elite Higher Education , 1998 .

[23]  Estelle James,et al.  Product Mix and Cost Disaggregation: A Reinterpretation of the Economics of Higher Education , 1978 .

[24]  Is There an Academic Audit in Your Future? Reforming Quality Assurance in U.S. Higher Education , 2000 .

[25]  M. Horn The Political Economy of Public Administration: Institutional Choice in the Public Sector , 1995 .

[26]  B. Clark,et al.  Substantive growth and innovative organization: New categories for higher education research , 1996 .

[27]  L. Shulman Forum: Teaching as Community Property , 1993 .

[28]  Estelle James,et al.  The university department as a non-profit labor cooperative , 1981 .

[29]  Cross-Subsidization in Higher Education: Does It Pervert Private Choice and Public Policy''in Levy , 1986 .

[30]  D. Woodhouse,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of the New Zealand Academic Audit Unit: Review and outcomes , 2000 .

[31]  Staffan Wahlén,et al.  Institutional Response to the Swedish Model of Quality Assurance , 2000 .

[32]  John M. Cohen Capacity Building in the Public Sector: A Focused Framework for Analysis and Action , 1995 .

[33]  David L. Weimer,et al.  Organizational report cards , 1999 .

[34]  L. Mcdonnell,et al.  Getting the Job Done: Alternative Policy Instruments , 1987 .

[35]  D. Dill,et al.  Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly , 1995 .