20 Years of Technology and Language Assessment in "Language Learning & Technology".

Carol A. Chapelle, Iowa State University Erik Voss, Northeastern University This review article provides an analysis of the research from the last two decades on the theme of technology and second language assessment. Based on an examination of the assessment scholarship published in Language Learning & Technology since its launch in 1997, we analyzed the review articles, research articles, book reviews, and commentaries as developing one of two primary thrusts of research on technology and language assessment: technology for efficiency and technology for innovation.

[1]  Adeline Teo,et al.  Promoting EFL students’ inferential reading skills through computerized dynamic assessment , 2012 .

[2]  Robert Godwin-Jones,et al.  Web-Writing 2.0: Enabling, Documenting, and Assessing Writing Online. , 2008 .

[3]  Carsten Roever,et al.  WEB-BASED LANGUAGE TESTING , 2001 .

[4]  Dorry M. Kenyon,et al.  COMPARING EXAMINEE ATTITUDES TOWARD COMPUTER- ASSISTED AND OTHER ORAL PROFICIENCY ASSESSMENTS , 2001 .

[5]  Greg Kessler.  Authoring Tools for Language Assessment , 2012 .

[6]  Edward W. Wolfe,et al.  Composition Medium Comparability in a Direct Writing Assessment of Non-Native English Speakers , 2004 .

[7]  Charlene Polio.  Review of Test Pilot , 2001 .

[8]  Jesús García Laborda,et al.  ON THE NET Introducing Standardized EFL/ESL Exams , 2007 .

[9]  Xiaoming Xi,et al.  Automatic scoring of non-native spontaneous speech in tests of spoken English , 2009, Speech Commun..

[10]  Jean W. LeLoup,et al.  Language testing resources , 2001 .

[11]  Li Zhang.  Review of Handbook Of Automated Essay Evaluation: Current Applications And New Directions , 2014 .

[12]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Applications of Text Analysis Tools for Spoken Response Grading , 2013 .

[13]  James Dean Brown,et al.  Computers in language testing: Present research and some future directions , 1997 .

[14]  Miriam Schcolnik,et al.  Asynchronous forums in EAP: Assessment issues , 2008 .

[15]  Carol A. Chapelle,et al.  Assessing Language through Computer Technology: The technology thread , 2006 .

[16]  Patricia A. Dunkel,et al.  Considerations in Developing or Using Second/Foreign Language Proficiency Computer-Adaptive Tests , 1999 .

[17]  Cristina Pardo-Ballester,et al.  Measuring Oral Proficiency in Distance, Face-to-Face, and Blended Classrooms , 2008 .

[18]  Robert Godwin-Jones.  Language testing tools and technologies , 2001 .

[19]  Volker Hegelheimer,et al.  7. When the technology course is required , 2006 .

[20]  Chi-Fen Emily Chen,et al.  Beyond the Design of Automated Writing Evaluation: Pedagogical Practices and Perceived Learning Effectiveness in EFL Writing Classes. , 2008 .

[21]  Ferit Kiliçkaya,et al.  Tips for Teaching with CALL: Practical Approaches to Computer-assisted Language Learning , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[22]  Elvis Wagner,et al.  Are they watching? Test-taker viewing behavior during an L2 video listening test , 2007 .

[23]  Micheline Chalhoub-Deville,et al.  Language testing and technology: past and future , 2001 .

[24]  Yasuyo Sawaki,et al.  Comparability of Conventional and Computerized Tests of Reading in a Second Language , 2001 .

[25]  Katerina Zourou.  Review of Assessment in Game-Based Learning: Foundations, Innovations, and Perspectives , 2014 .

[26]  John M. Norris,et al.  Concerns with Computerized Adaptive Oral Proficiency Assessment , 2001 .