Dangerously Intelligent: A Call for Re-Evaluating Psychopathy Using Perceptions of Intelligence

Background: Primary psychopathy (i.e., unemotional and callous predisposition) is associated with career, educational, and general life success, whereas secondary psychopathy (i.e., impulsivity and risk-taking) relates to criminality, hedonistic lifestyles, and detrimental behaviours. Although psychopathy sub-types have differential relationships to career and life success, how these traits are perceived by others relating to intelligence has not previously been researched. It is also unclear what role an individual’s own psychopathy score plays in perceptions of intelligence. Methods: In an online experiment (n = 458), we investigated perceptions of intelligence (via a combined proxy of whether the rater thought the character in the vignettes had a high IQ and had attended university), using 12 vignettes of high and low primary and secondary psychopathic individuals. Results: High-secondary-psychopathy vignettes were perceived as least intelligent (in agreement with the literature which states people high in secondary psychopathy traits are usually involved in petty crimes, risk taking, and substance abuse, and therefore perceived as socially undesirable). Low-secondary-psychopathy vignettes were perceived significantly more intelligent than high-primary-psychopathy vignettes (in-line with the literature suggesting the placidity and kindness which comes with being low in psychopathic traits is an amenable quality in our society). There was evidence for assortative intelligence perceptions: those high-primary psychopathy self-scorers perceived primary psychopathy vignettes as intelligent (which could be evidence of a ‘likes attract’ phenomenon, whereby those high in primary psychopathy admire others who are similarly high in primary psychopathy). Conclusions: The results suggest individuals demonstrating risk-taking behaviours are perceived as least intelligent, supporting previous research associating secondary psychopathy with poor academic or career success.

[1]  P. Jonason,et al.  Academic dishonesty among university students: The roles of the psychopathy, motivation, and self-efficacy , 2020, PloS one.

[2]  A. Sumich,et al.  A systematic review on the current conceptualisations of successful psychopathy , 2020, Forensic Science International: Mind and Law.

[3]  D. Boduszek,et al.  Clarifying the Relationship between Psychopathy and Intelligence Using Four Dimensions of the WASI-II , 2020, Deviant Behavior.

[4]  D. Falkenbach,et al.  Theory based gender differences in psychopathy subtypes , 2017 .

[5]  A. Karbowski,et al.  Perceived female intelligence as economic bad in partner choice , 2016 .

[6]  A. Yousaf,et al.  Probing the interactive effects of career commitment and emotional intelligence on perceived objective/subjective career success , 2016 .

[7]  M. Ilyas,et al.  Intelligence and its impact on managerial effectiveness and career success (evidence from insurance sector of Pakistan) , 2016 .

[8]  A. Grob,et al.  Testing Relations of Crystallized and Fluid Intelligence and the Incremental Predictive Validity of Conscientiousness and Its Facets on Career Success in a Small Sample of German and Swiss Workers , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[9]  Ashley L. Watts,et al.  Psychopathy: Relations with three conceptions of intelligence. , 2016, Personality disorders.

[10]  M. Lyons,et al.  An effective way to deal with predators is to taste terrible: Primary and secondary psychopathy and mate preference , 2016 .

[11]  Anita C. Keller,et al.  Do Bad Guys Get Ahead or Fall Behind? Relationships of the Dark Triad of Personality With Objective and Subjective Career Success , 2016 .

[12]  M. Lyons,et al.  The undesirable Dark Triad? Women dislike Dark Triad male faces across different mating context and socio-ecological conditions , 2016 .

[13]  B. Yildirim,et al.  Clarifying the heterogeneity in psychopathic samples: Towards a new continuum of primary and secondary psychopathy ☆ , 2015 .

[14]  R. Rogers,et al.  Denial of risk: The effects of positive impression management on risk assessments for psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders. , 2015, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[15]  D. Boduszek,et al.  Psychopathic traits of business and psychology students and their relationship to academic success , 2015 .

[16]  C. Reeve,et al.  Intelligence and Psychopathy Do Not Influence Malingering , 2015, Applied neuropsychology. Adult.

[17]  R. Hare,et al.  Corporate Psychopathy and the Full-Range Leadership Model , 2015, Assessment.

[18]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  The Vertical Dimension of Social Relations and Accurate Interpersonal Perception: A Meta-Analysis , 2015 .

[19]  Kevin M. Beaver,et al.  Psychopathic personality traits, intelligence, and economic success , 2015 .

[20]  Paul Babiak,et al.  Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work , 2015 .

[21]  Claire Hewson Conducting research on the internet - a new era , 2014 .

[22]  Matthew M. Gervais,et al.  Subclinical Primary Psychopathy, but Not Physical Formidability or Attractiveness, Predicts Conversational Dominance in a Zero-Acquaintance Situation , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  J. L. Costa,et al.  Does Trait Emotional Intelligence Predict Unique Variance in Early Career Success Beyond IQ and Personality? , 2014 .

[24]  Christina N. Massey,et al.  The Relationship among Psychopathy, Emotional Intelligence, and Professional Success in Finance , 2014 .

[25]  S. Porter,et al.  The Big Bad Wolf? the relation between the Dark Triad and the interpersonal assessment of vulnerability , 2014 .

[26]  Ashley L. Watts,et al.  Correlates of psychopathic personality traits in everyday life: results from a large community survey , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[27]  Kai Chi Yam,et al.  Morning employees are perceived as better employees: employees' start times influence supervisor performance ratings. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  A. Mokros,et al.  Psychopathy, intelligence, and impulsivity in German violent offenders. , 2014, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[29]  J. Flegr,et al.  Perceived Intelligence Is Associated with Measured Intelligence in Men but Not Women , 2014, PloS one.

[30]  G. Banks,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Review of the Dark Triad-Intelligence Connection , 2013 .

[31]  Minna Lyons,et al.  Creatures of the night: Chronotypes and the Dark Triad traits , 2013 .

[32]  J. Edens,et al.  Bold, smart, dangerous and evil: perceived correlates of core psychopathic traits among jury panel members. , 2013, Personality and mental health.

[33]  Gorkan Ahmetoglu,et al.  Greed is good? Assessing the relationship between entrepreneurship and subclinical psychopathy , 2013 .

[34]  Catherine A. Sugar,et al.  Secondary Psychopathy, but not Primary Psychopathy, is Associated with Risky Decision-Making in Noninstitutionalized Young Adults. , 2013, Personality and individual differences.

[35]  T. Moffitt,et al.  Findings from the Pittsburgh Youth Study: cognitive impulsivity and intelligence as predictors of the age-crime curve. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[36]  S. Crafter,et al.  The problem of interpretation in vignette methodology in research with young people , 2012 .

[37]  Ashley L. Watts,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Fearless Dominance and the U.S. Presidency: Implications of Psychopathic Personality Traits for Successful and Unsuccessful Political Leadership , 2012 .

[38]  J. Rauthmann The Dark Triad and Interpersonal Perception: Similarities and Differences in the Social Consequences of Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy , 2012 .

[39]  J. Maner,et al.  Don't hate me because I'm beautiful: Anti-attractiveness bias in organizational evaluation and decision making , 2010 .

[40]  I. Deary,et al.  Intelligence and education: causal perceptions drive analytic processes and therefore conclusions. , 2010, International journal of epidemiology.

[41]  Kevin M. Beaver,et al.  The Hannibal Lecter Myth: Psychopathy and Verbal Intelligence in the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study , 2010 .

[42]  A. Raine,et al.  Successful and unsuccessful psychopaths: a neurobiological model. , 2010, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[43]  Paul Babiak,et al.  Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. , 2010, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[44]  Toni Eason Emotional Intelligence and Nursing Leadership: A Successful Combination , 2009, Creative Nursing.

[45]  C. Anderson,et al.  Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  A. Furnham,et al.  “How to spot a psychopath” , 2009, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[47]  M. Spörrle,et al.  Success Attributions and More: Multidimensional Extensions of the Sexual Attribution Bias to Failure Attributions, Social Emotions, and the Desire for Social Interaction , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[48]  J. Coid,et al.  Psychopathic personality traits and life-success , 2008 .

[49]  Blema S. Steinberg Women in Power: The Personalities and Leadership Styles of Indira Gandhi, Golda Meir, and Margaret Thatcher , 2008 .

[50]  C. Neumann,et al.  Differential Relationships Between the Dimensions of Psychopathy and Intelligence , 2008 .

[51]  Jennifer L. Groscup,et al.  The effects of eyeglasses and race on juror decisions involving a violent crime. , 2008 .

[52]  M. Terwogt,et al.  Emotion awareness and internalising symptoms in children and adolescents: The Emotion Awareness Questionnaire revised , 2008 .

[53]  Tarmo Strenze Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research ☆ , 2007 .

[54]  J. Skeem,et al.  Two subtypes of psychopathic violent offenders that parallel primary and secondary variants. , 2007, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[55]  N. A. Murphy Appearing Smart: The Impression Management of Intelligence, Person Perception Accuracy, and Behavior in Social Interaction , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[56]  D. K. Marcus,et al.  INTERPERSONAL PERCEPTION OF PSYCHOPATHY: A SOCIAL RELATIONS ANALYSIS , 2006 .

[57]  Scott O Lilienfeld,et al.  Psychopathic, not psychopath: taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of psychopathy. , 2006, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[58]  A. Furnham,et al.  Deciding on promotions and redundancies: Promoting people by ability, experience, gender and motivation , 2006 .

[59]  Robert R. McCrae,et al.  The NEO–PI–3: A More Readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory , 2005, Journal of personality assessment.

[60]  M. Huby,et al.  The construction and interpretation of vignettes in social research , 2012, Social Work and Social Sciences Review.

[61]  J. Holmes,et al.  Women managing discourse in the workplace , 2003 .

[62]  R. Humphrey,et al.  Empathy and complex task performance: two routes to leadership , 2002 .

[63]  Wanda S. Maulding Emotional Intelligence and Successful Leadership. , 2002 .

[64]  Stevens S. Smith,et al.  Construct validation of a self-report psychopathy scale: does Levenson's self-report psychopathy scale measure the same constructs as Hare's psychopathy checklist-revised? , 2001 .

[65]  S. Whiteside,et al.  Self-reported psychopathy: a validation study. , 1999, Journal of personality assessment.

[66]  D. Gould Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: how valid are the findings? , 1996, Journal of clinical nursing.

[67]  K A Kiehl,et al.  Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. , 1993 .