Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size

The aim was to evaluate the impact of a reference ball for calibration of periapical and panoramic radiographs on preoperative selection of implant size for three implant systems. Presurgical digital radiographs (70 panoramic, 43 periapical) from 70 patients scheduled for single-tooth implant treatment, recorded with a metal ball placed in the edentulous area, were evaluated by three observers with the intent to select the appropriate implant size. Four reference marks corresponding to the margins of the metal ball were manually placed on the digital image by means of computer software. Additionally, an implant with proper dimensions for the respective site was outlined by manually placing four reference marks. The diameter of the metal ball and the unadjusted length and width of the implant were calculated. Implant size was adjusted according to a “standard” calibration method (SCM; magnification factor 1.25 in panoramic images and 1.05 in periapical images) and according to a reference ball calibration method (RCM; true magnification). Based on the unadjusted as well as the adjusted implant dimensions, the implant size was selected among those available in a given implant system. For periapical radiographs, when comparing SCM and RCM with unadjusted implant dimensions, implant size changed in 42% and 58%, respectively. When comparing SCM and RCM, implant size changed in 24%. For panoramic radiographs, comparing SCM and RCM changed implant size in 48%. The use of a reference metal ball for calibration of periapical and panoramic radiographs when selecting implant size during treatment planning might be advantageous.

[1]  D A Tyndall,et al.  Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[2]  P. Cury,et al.  Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[3]  K. Dula,et al.  Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  N. Ferrigno,et al.  A long-term follow-up study of non-submerged ITI implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Part I: Ten-year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 1286 implants. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  A Vissink,et al.  Bone height measurements on panoramic radiographs: the effect of shape and position of edentulous mandibles. , 1997, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[6]  T. A. Larheim,et al.  Determination of tooth length with a standardized paralleling technique and calibrated radiographic measuring film. , 1979, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[7]  Reinhilde Jacobs,et al.  Radiographic Planning and Assessment of Endosseous Oral Implants , 1998 .

[8]  A Wenzel,et al.  Impact of conventional tomography on prediction of the appropriate implant size. , 2001, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[9]  Smith Jp,et al.  Stent marker materials for computerized tomograph-assisted implant planning. , 1996 .

[10]  U Welander,et al.  Image Distortion in Rotational Panoramic Radiography , 1981, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[11]  G. Seward,et al.  Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation , 1982 .

[12]  W. McDavid,et al.  Image Distortion in Rotational Panoramic Radiography , 1982, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[13]  C. Leles,et al.  Changes in the pre-surgical treatment planning using conventional spiral tomography. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  F. Renouard,et al.  Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  F. Carinci,et al.  Do longer implants improve clinical outcome in immediate loading? , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[16]  Bjarni E Pjetursson,et al.  A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  S E Eckert,et al.  Analysis of incidence and associated factors with fractured implants: a retrospective study. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  S Winkler,et al.  Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. , 2000, Annals of periodontology.

[19]  W Schulte,et al.  Area-dependent enlargement ratios of panoramic tomography on orthograde patient positioning and its significance for implant dentistry. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[20]  A Wenzel,et al.  Development of a system for craniofacial analysis from monitor-displayed digital images. , 1999, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[21]  G Tronje,et al.  Image Distortion in Rotational Panoramic Radiography. : I. General Consideration. , 1982 .

[22]  D P Tarnow,et al.  The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[23]  Paul Fletcher,et al.  Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.