Enhanced peptide mass fingerprinting through high mass accuracy: Exclusion of non-peptide signals based on residual mass.

Peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) is among the principle methods of contemporary proteomic analysis. While PMF is routinely practiced in many laboratories, the complexity of protein tryptic digests is such that PMF based on unrefined mass spectrometric peak lists is often inconclusive. A number of data processing strategies have thus been designed to improve the quality of PMF peak lists, and the development of increasingly elaborate tools for PMF data reduction remains an active area of research. In this report, a novel and direct means of PMF peak list enhancement is suggested. Since the monoisotopic mass of a peptide must fall within a predictable range of residual values, PMF peak lists can in principle be relieved of many non-peptide signals solely on the basis of accurately determined monoisotopic mass. The calculations involved are relatively simple, making implementation of this scheme computationally facile. When this procedure for peak list processing was used, the large number of unassigned masses typical of PMF peak lists was considerably attenuated. As a result, protein identifications could be made with greater confidence and improved discrimination as compared to PMF queries submitted with raw peak lists. Importantly, this scheme for removal of non-peptide masses was found to conserve peptides bearing various post-translational and artificial modifications. All PMF experiments discussed here were performed using Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FTICR-MS), which provided the high mass resolution and high mass accuracy essential for this application. Previously reported equations relating the nominal peptide mass to the permissible range of fractional peptide masses were slightly modified for this application, and these adjustments have been illustrated in detail. The role of mass accuracy in application of this scheme has also been explored.

[1]  T. Rejtar,et al.  A universal denoising and peak picking algorithm for LC-MS based on matched filtration in the chromatographic time domain. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[2]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Proteomics by FTICR mass spectrometry: top down and bottom up. , 2005, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[3]  J. Yates,et al.  Performance of a linear ion trap-Orbitrap hybrid for peptide analysis. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  D. Creasy,et al.  Error tolerant searching of uninterpreted tandem mass spectrometry data , 2002, Proteomics.

[5]  Frank Schmidt,et al.  Iterative data analysis is the key for exhaustive analysis of peptide mass fingerprints from proteins separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis , 2003, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[6]  M. Emmett,et al.  Theoretical and experimental prospects for protein identification based solely on accurate mass measurement. , 2004, Journal of proteome research.

[7]  I. Amster,et al.  Broad-band ion accumulation with an internal source MALDI-FTICR-MS. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[8]  J. Reilly,et al.  Artifacts and unassigned masses encountered in peptide mass mapping. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[9]  John T. Stults,et al.  Protein identification: The origins of peptide mass fingerprinting , 2003, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[10]  R D Appel,et al.  Improving protein identification from peptide mass fingerprinting through a parameterized multi‐level scoring algorithm and an optimized peak detection , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[11]  M. Witt,et al.  Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry with NanoLC/microelectrospray ionization and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization: Analytical performance in peptide mass fingerprint analysis , 2003, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[12]  P Berndt,et al.  Reliable automatic protein identification from matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric peptide fingerprints , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[13]  D. Barofsky,et al.  Complementary use of MALDI and ESI for the HPLC-MS/MS analysis of DNA-binding proteins. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  Roman A. Zubarev,et al.  Accuracy Requirements for Peptide Characterization by Monoisotopic Molecular Mass Measurements , 1996 .

[15]  D. Hochstrasser,et al.  Modeling peptide mass fingerprinting data using the atomic composition of peptides , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[16]  Thorsteinn S. Rögnvaldsson,et al.  Improving automatic peptide mass fingerprint protein identification by combining many peak sets. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[17]  G. Gonnet,et al.  Protein identification by mass profile fingerprinting. , 1993, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[18]  J. Bergquist,et al.  Reproducibility of tryptic digestion investigated by quantitative fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. , 2005, Journal of Proteome Research.

[19]  M. Mann,et al.  Trypsin Cleaves Exclusively C-terminal to Arginine and Lysine Residues*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[20]  M. Mann,et al.  Parts per Million Mass Accuracy on an Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer via Lock Mass Injection into a C-trap*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[21]  K. Markides,et al.  Peptide mapping of proteins in human body fluids using electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. , 2002, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[22]  M. Senko,et al.  Determination of monoisotopic masses and ion populations for large biomolecules from resolved isotopic distributions , 1995, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[23]  D. Horn,et al.  Improved protein identification using automated high mass measurement accuracy MALDI FT-ICR MS peptide mass fingerprinting , 2004 .

[24]  Edmond J. Breen,et al.  Automatic Poisson peak harvesting for high throughput protein identification , 2000, Electrophoresis.

[25]  F. Regnier,et al.  An automated method for the analysis of stable isotope labeling data in proteomics , 2005, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[26]  Rune Matthiesen,et al.  Use of performic acid oxidation to expand the mass distribution of tryptic peptides. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[27]  Mikhail M Savitski,et al.  Improving Protein Identification Using Complementary Fragmentation Techniques in Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry* , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[28]  C. Costello,et al.  Internal calibration on adjacent samples (InCAS) with Fourier transform mass spectrometry. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[29]  A. Marshall,et al.  Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry: a primer. , 1998, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[30]  Sándor Suhai,et al.  Fragmentation Pathways of Protonated Peptides , 2006 .

[31]  D. N. Perkins,et al.  Probability‐based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[32]  M. Savitski,et al.  Physicochemical properties determining the detection probability of tryptic peptides in Fourier transform mass spectrometry. A correlation study. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[33]  P. Højrup,et al.  Rapid identification of proteins by peptide-mass fingerprinting , 1993, Current Biology.

[34]  Fredrik Levander,et al.  Modular, scriptable and automated analysis tools for high-throughput peptide mass fingerprinting , 2004, Bioinform..

[35]  Jean-Philippe Lambert,et al.  Proteomics: from gel based to gel free. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[36]  T. Hunkapiller,et al.  Peptide mass maps: a highly informative approach to protein identification. , 1993, Analytical biochemistry.

[37]  M. Gross,et al.  Accurate mass measurements by Fourier transform mass spectrometry , 2005 .