A Technology Pathway for Airbreathing, Combined-Cycle, Horizontal Space Launch Through SR-71 Based Trajectory Modeling

Access to space is in the early stages of commercialization. Private enterprises, mainly under direct or indirect subsidy by the government, have been making headway into the LEO launch systems infrastructure, of small-weight-class payloads of approximately 1000 lbs. These moderate gains have emboldened the launch industry and they are poised to move into the middle-weight class (roughly 5000 lbs). These commercially successful systems are based on relatively straightforward LOX-RP, two-stage, bi-propellant rocket technology developed by the government 40 years ago, accompanied by many technology improvements. In this paper we examine a known generic LOX-RP system with the focus on the booster stage (1st stage). The booster stage is then compared to modeled Rocket-Based and Turbine-Based Combined Cycle booster stages. The air-breathing propulsion stages are based on/or extrapolated from known performance parameters of ground tested RBCC (the Marquardt Ejector Ramjet) and TBCC (the SR-71/J-58 engine) data. Validated engine models using GECAT and SCCREAM are coupled with trajectory optimization and analysis in POST-II to explore viable launch scenarios using hypothetical aerospaceplane platform obeying the aerodynamic model of the SR-71. Finally, and assessment is made of the requisite research technology advances necessary for successful commercial and government adoption of combined-cycle engine systems for space access.

[1]  Edwards Afb,et al.  Flight Test Results from the Rake Airflow Gage Experiment on the F-15B Airplane , 2010 .

[2]  John R. Olds,et al.  Two Options for Flight Testing Rocket-Based Combined-Cycle Engines , 1999 .

[3]  Corin Segal,et al.  Combined Rocket and Airbreathing Propulsion Systems for Space-Launch Applications , 1998 .

[4]  Joseph M. Roche,et al.  Performance Validation Approach for the GTX Air-Breathing Launch Vehicle , 2002 .

[5]  John R. Olds,et al.  Responsive Access Small Cargo Affordable Launch (RASCAL) Independent Performance Evaluation , 2005 .

[6]  Zhanxue Wang,et al.  Integrated Performance Numerical Simulation of Hypersonic Vehicle and Turbine Based Combined Cycle Propulsion System , 2009 .

[7]  Nalin A. Ratnayake,et al.  Design and Calibration of a Flowfield Survey Rake for Inlet Flight Research , 2013 .

[8]  Kirk Sorensen,et al.  Hyperion: An SSTO Vision Vehicle Concept Utilizing Rocket-Based Combined Cycle Propulsion , 1999 .

[9]  Ned Allen,et al.  From Archangel to Senior Crown: Design and Development of the Blackbird , 2008 .

[10]  Peter W. Merlin.  From Archangel to Senior Crown , 2008 .

[11]  Uwe Hueter.  Rocket-Based Combined-Cycle Propulsion Technology for Access-to-Space Applications , 1999 .

[12]  Ramon Chase,et al.  The Quest for a Robust, Responsive, Reliable, Efficient And Low Cost Space Access Capability , 2009 .

[13]  Ramon Chase,et al.  The Quest for Hypersonic Flight with Air-Breathing Propulsion , 2008 .

[14]  John R. Olds,et al.  Options for Flight Testing Rocket-Based Combined-Cycle (RBCC) Engines , 1996 .

[15]  Eric C. Anderson,et al.  Using a modified SR-71 aircraft and air-launched expendable rockets to place small payloads into orbit , 1996 .

[16]  Edward S. Rutowski.  Energy Approach to the General Aircraft Performance Problem , 1954 .

[17]  Jack D. Mattingly,et al.  Elements of Propulsion: Gas Turbines and Rockets , 1996 .

[18]  Timothy R. Moes,et al.  Local Flow Conditions for Propulsion Experiments on the NASA F-15b Propulsion Flight Test Fixture , 2013 .

[19]  Darin Marriott,et al.  First Stage of a Highly Reliable Reusable Launch System , 2009 .

[20]  Brian A. Maicke,et al.  Current State of High Speed Propulsion: Gaps, Obstacles, and Technological Challenges in Hypersonic Applications , 2009 .

[21]  Nalin A. Ratnayake.  Analysis of a Channeled Centerbody Supersonic Inlet for F-15B Flight Research , 2010 .