Reducing Development Time of Electric Machines with SyMSpace

This paper presents methods to accelerate the optimization of electrical machines using the software tool SyMSpace. Due to the nonlinear properties of soft magnetic materials, finite element analysis (FEA) is typically used for the simulation of electrical machines. For a complete optimization run hundreds to several thousand FEA calculations are required, which are computationally very expensive. Simple measures such as consideration of symmetries in the geometry to more sophisticated techniques like generation of a surrogate motor model can easily achieve a significant reduction in the calculation effort. By means of novel optimization algorithms specially designed for electrical machines, it is possible to achieve faster convergence of the Pareto front. To further speed-up the optimization a nonlinear mapping between the optimization variables and objectives based on artificial neural networks (ANNs) is derived during the optimization run to cut down the simulation time significantly. Once the optimization has converged, the most suitable machine for the particular application can be selected from the Paret front for further detailed analysis. For example, it is possible to generate an accurate motor model for further dynamic simulations in the form of a functional mock-up unit (FMU). Additionally, it is also possible to create data files for rapid prototyping fully automatically. This comprises, for example, data files for laser cutting, STL files for 3D printing of insulation parts and generation of program code for a needle winding machine.

[1]  W. Amrhein,et al.  A flux-based PMSM motor model using RBF interpolation for time-stepping simulations , 2013, 2013 International Electric Machines & Drives Conference.

[2]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm For Multiobjective Optimization , 2002 .

[3]  R. L. Hardy Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces , 1971 .

[4]  Edwin Lughofer,et al.  Performance comparison of generational and steady-state asynchronous multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for computationally-intensive problems , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[5]  Martin D. Buhmann,et al.  Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations: Preface , 2003 .

[6]  Edwin Lughofer,et al.  DECMO2: a robust hybrid and adaptive multi-objective evolutionary algorithm , 2014, Soft Computing.

[7]  Edwin Lughofer,et al.  On the Performance of Master-Slave Parallelization Methods for Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms , 2013, ICAISC.

[8]  Edwin Lughofer,et al.  A Hybrid Soft Computing Approach for Optimizing Design Parameters of Electrical Drives , 2012, SOCO.

[9]  Andreas Junghanns,et al.  The Functional Mockup Interface for Tool independent Exchange of Simulation Models , 2011 .

[10]  Martin D. Buhmann,et al.  Radial Basis Functions , 2021, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[11]  Johannes Gerstmayr,et al.  Coupled optimization in MagOpt , 2016, J. Syst. Control. Eng..

[12]  Nicola Bianchi,et al.  Selection Criteria and Robust Optimization of a Traction PM-Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Motor , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[13]  Stephan M. Winkler,et al.  Using FE Calculations and Data-Based System Identification Techniques to Model the Nonlinear Behavior of PMSMs , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[14]  S. L. Ho,et al.  Design Optimization of a Novel Doubly Fed Dual-Rotor Flux-Modulated Machine for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[15]  A. Orellano,et al.  Pareto Optimization in Terms of Electromagnetic and Thermal Characteristics of Air-Cooled Asynchronous Induction Machines Applied in Railway Traction Drives , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[16]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[17]  N. Matsui,et al.  A Novel Approach for Circuit-Field-Coupled Time Stepping Electromagnetic Analysis of Saturated Interior PM Motors , 2007, 2007 IEEE Industry Applications Annual Meeting.

[18]  W. Amrhein,et al.  A dynamic nonlinear model for permanent magnet synchronous machines , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[19]  Dan M. Ionel,et al.  A review of recent developments in electrical machine design optimization methods with a permanent magnet synchronous motor benchmark study , 2011 .