Individual cortical connectivity changes after stroke: A resampling approach to enable statistical assessment at single-subject level

One of the main limitations commonly encountered when dealing with the estimation of brain connectivity is the difficulty to perform a statistical assessment of significant changes in brain networks at a single-subject level. This is mainly due to the lack of information about the distribution of the connectivity estimators at different conditions. While group analysis is commonly adopted to perform a statistical comparison between conditions, it may impose major limitations when dealing with the heterogeneity expressed by a given clinical condition in patients. This holds true particularly for stroke when seeking for quantitative measurements of the efficacy of any rehabilitative intervention promoting recovery of function. The need is then evident of an assessment which may account for individual pathological network configuration associated with different level of patients' response to treatment; such network configuration is highly related to the effect that a given brain lesion has on neural networks. In this study we propose a resampling-based approach to the assessment of statistically significant changes in cortical connectivity networks at a single subject level. First, we provide the results of a simulation study testing the performances of the proposed approach under different conditions. Then, to show the sensitivity of the method, we describe its application to electroencephalographic (EEG) data recorded from two post-stroke patients who showed different clinical recovery after a rehabilitative intervention.

[1]  Lara Allet,et al.  EEG Alpha Band Synchrony Predicts Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients with Ischemic Stroke , 2013, Behavioural neurology.

[2]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Describing relevant indices from the resting state electrophysiological networks , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[4]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[6]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Aged-related changes in brain activity classification with respect to age by means of graph indexes , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[8]  K. Sameshima,et al.  Connectivity Inference between Neural Structures via Partial Directed Coherence , 2007 .

[9]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Cortical Network Dynamics during Foot Movements , 2008, Neuroinformatics.

[10]  David Hinkley,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 2008 .

[11]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[12]  M. Levesley,et al.  Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  Shanbao Tong,et al.  Impaired neuronal synchrony after focal ischemic stroke in elderly patients , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Assessing cortical functional connectivity by partial directed coherence: simulations and application to real data , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Liang Wang,et al.  Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.