Un estudio sobre los componentes pedagógicos de los cursos online masivos = A Study on the Pedagogical Components of Massive Online Courses

At the end of the first decade of the 21st century, the rapid growth in the MOOC offering brought about a new educational landscape, posing new challenges to teaching and learning, mainly due to massive participation, ubiquity and free enrollment. These courses embody a confluence of technological and pedagogical mediations yet to be fully explored. This study, applying an instrument of educational and interactive indicators on a MOOC (INdiMOOC-EdI) designed by the authors, seeks to ascertain the pedagogical components of MOOCs delivered in the Spanish language in order to establish which course features are platform dependent. An exploratory sequential mixed methods study was carried out on a total of 117 courses within 10 different platforms via an instrument developed and validated ad hoc. The data obtained is subjected to a content analysis for a qualitative perspective; while a quantitative perspective is obtained through a statistical analysis complemented with classification algorithms typical in data mining. The results suggest that the different platform providers condition the pedagogical design of the MOOC in five key areas: learning, activities and tasks, means and resources, interactivity and assessment. It concludes with a series of descriptive, educational and interactive indicators that can be a pedagogical benchmark for future MOOCs.

[1]  Óscar Molina Molina,et al.  Rotación en análisis de componentes principales categórico: un caso práctico , 2010 .

[2]  I. Roque,et al.  METODOLOGÍA DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN , 2019, Cultura de emprendimiento corporativo en las micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas colombianas.

[3]  Denise E. DeLorme,et al.  Perceived Third‐Person Effects and Consumer Attitudes on Prevetting and Banning DTC Advertising , 2006 .

[4]  Antonio Fini,et al.  The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools , 2009 .

[5]  Sean C. Abajian,et al.  Emotive Vocabulary in MOOCs: Context & Participant Retention , 2012 .

[6]  Marcela Aravena,et al.  Investigación educativa I , 2006 .

[7]  Sherif A. Halawa,et al.  Dropout Prediction in MOOCs using Learner Activity Features , 2014 .

[8]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[9]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Disruptive Pedagogies and Technologies in Universities , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[10]  Cristóbal Suárez Guerrero,et al.  Evaluación de la calidad pedagógica de los MOOC , 2014 .

[11]  Katy Jordan,et al.  Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses , 2014 .

[12]  David George Glance,et al.  The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses , 2013, First Monday.

[13]  E. Vázquez El videoartículo : nuevo formato de divulgación en revistas científicas y su integración en MOOCs = The Videoarticle : New Reporting Format in Scientific Journals and its Integration in MOOCs. , 2013 .

[14]  C. H. Lawshe A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY , 1975 .

[15]  Miguel Zapata-Ros MOOCs, una visión crítica y una alternativa complementaria: La individualización del aprendizaje y de la ayuda pedagógica , 2015 .

[16]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs Los MOOC como tecnologías disruptivas: estrategias para mejorar la experiencia de aprendizaje y la calidad de los MOOC. , 2016 .

[17]  C. Osvaldo Rodriguez,et al.  MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. , 2012 .

[18]  Jacqueline Baxter,et al.  Roles and student identities in online large course forums: Implications for practice , 2014 .

[19]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Generating Accurate Rule Sets Without Global Optimization , 1998, ICML.

[20]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .