The neural signal for skin indentation depth. I. Changing indentations

Psychophysical tests on human subjects showed that judgments of skin indentation depth made when the fingertip was indented at rates from 0.2 to 16 mm/sec were quite insensitive to changes in indentation velocity. Similar results were obtained on the forearm at indentation velocities of 0.4 to 16 mm/sec. Recordings were made from mechanoreceptors in the monkey's hand that were able to respond over the same range of velocities and at comparable depths to determine how skin indentation depth might be signaled (coded) at the receptor level and to examine the rate sensitivity of the possible depth codes. It was found that most of the receptors with foci under the stimulator were recruited relatively early during an indentation, especially at velocities of 1.6 mm/sec and higher, making it improbable that the full range of indentation depths is signaled by the “subsurface” recruitment of different receptors at different indentation depths. A subsurface recruitment code involving subcutaneous receptors is not likely since subjects could feel virtually none of the stimuli after skin anesthesia. Progressive recruitment with depth of receptors whose foci lie further and further away from the stimulator (“lateral” recruitment) was considered an unlikely depth code because changing the area of the stimulator had little effect on its perceived depth. Also, it was shown that subjects could sense the curvature of the indentation (the profile of the depth at right angles to the skin surface), which requires information about the depth of individual patches of skin beneath the stimulator. There is no obvious way that a lateral recruitment code can provide this information. Thus it is probable that the discharge rate of some or all of the receptors excited by the indentation is involved in indicating its depth. Both impulse frequency and receptor recruitment at any given depth increased as the velocity of the indentation increased. The demonstrated reliability of information about skin indentation depth in humans indicates that the central neural circuitry responsible for judgments of skin indentation depth is able to compensate for the rate-sensitive receptor signals.

[1]  H. Head,et al.  THE CONSEQUENCES OF INJURY TO THE PERIPHERAL NERVES IN MAN , 1905 .

[2]  S. Renfrew,et al.  The somatic sense of space (choraesthesia) and its threshold. , 1960, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  C. J. Armett,et al.  Excitation of receptors in the pad of the cat by single and double mechanical pulses , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  D. Tapper,et al.  Stimulus-response relationships in the cutaneous slowly-adapting mechanoreceptor in hairy skin of the cat. , 1965, Experimental neurology.

[5]  U. Lindblom,et al.  Properties of touch receptors in distal glabrous skin of the monkey. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  P R Burgess,et al.  Myelinated afferent fibres responding specifically to noxious stimulation of the skin , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  A. R. Muir,et al.  The structure and function of a slowly adapting touch corpuscle in hairy skin , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  J. Hyvärinen,et al.  Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys. Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  L. Pubols,et al.  Functional properties of mechanoreceptors in glabrous skin of the raccoon's forepaw. , 1971, Experimental neurology.

[11]  W. Jänig,et al.  Morphology of rapidly and slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the hairless skin of the cat's hind foot. , 1971, Brain research.

[12]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Detection thresholds for stimuli in humans and monkeys: comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibers innervating the monkey hand. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  M. R. Chambers,et al.  The structure and function of the slowly adapting type II mechanoreceptor in hairy skin. , 1972, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[14]  R. Dykes,et al.  "Cold" fiber population innervating palmar and digital skin of the monkey: responses to cooling pulses. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  M. Knibestöl Stimulus—response functions of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  P. R. Burgess,et al.  Cutaneous Mechanoreceptors and Nociceptors , 1973 .

[17]  P. R. Burgess,et al.  Cutaneous receptors supplied by myelinated fibers in the cat. I. Number of receptors innervated by a single nerve. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  M. Knibestöl Stimulus‐response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  F. J. Clark,et al.  Awareness of knee joint angle under static conditions. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  L. Pubols,et al.  Coding of mechanical stimulus velocity and indentation depth by squirrel monkey and raccoon glabrous skin mechanoreceptors. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Apostolos P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Functional properties of primary afferent units probably related to pain mechanisms in primate glabrous skin , 1976 .

[22]  K. Horch,et al.  Response of cutaneous hair and field mechanoreceptors in cat to threshold stimuli. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  A B Vallbo,et al.  Intensity of sensation related to activity of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive units in the human hand , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  Depth sense aesthesiometry: an advance in the clinical assessment of sensation in the hands. , 1981, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[26]  Michael M. Merzenich,et al.  Neural coding in the sense of touch: Human sensations of skin indentation compared with the responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hairy skin of monkeys , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.