Spectral Detection of Frequency-Sparse Signals: Compressed Sensing vs. Sweeping Spectrum Scanning

In cognitive radio (CR) systems, compressed sensing (CS) has emerged as a promising approach for detecting wireless spectrum that is underutilized (i.e., sparse in the frequency domain). The use of CS techniques is believed to reduce the sensing time at minimal hardware overhead compared to the traditional sweeping spectrum scanner, which is a simple energy detector that scans the frequency bins sequentially. Although the sweeping spectrum scanners can be parallelized to reduce the total scanning time, time-multiplexing is still necessary to cover the very large scanning bandwidth. By contrast, the CS spectrum scanner captures the entire spectrum concurrently to detect the occupied frequency bins. Despite the recent popularity of CS spectrum sensing techniques, no published work is available that rigorously compares the performance of these two sensing schemes under similar hardware constraints and same available total sensing time. This paper makes such a comparison and shows that the multi-channel sweeping spectrum scanner outperforms the CS scanner except at the high input signal-to-noise ratios when the two scanners become comparable. The advantage of the sweeping scanner is that although it observes each frequency bin for a shorter time, each sensing is more reliable and not corrupted by the folding of other frequency bins as in the CS scanner.

[1]  Ying-Chang Liang,et al.  Deep CM-CNN for Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio , 2019, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[2]  R. B. Deshmukh,et al.  A Systematic Review of Compressive Sensing: Concepts, Implementations and Applications , 2018, IEEE Access.

[3]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  The Pros and Cons of Compressive Sensing for Wideband Signal Acquisition: Noise Folding versus Dynamic Range , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[4]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Signal Recovery From Random Measurements Via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  Murat Torlak,et al.  Interferer-Robust Compressed Sensing Receiver Based on Mixer Harmonics , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN).

[7]  Xiaofu Ma,et al.  Practical Issues for Spectrum Management With Cognitive Radios , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Blind Multiband Signal Reconstruction: Compressed Sensing for Analog Signals , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  T. Blumensath,et al.  Theory and Applications , 2011 .

[10]  Geert Leus,et al.  Compressive Wideband Power Spectrum Estimation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Yulong Gao,et al.  Sparse-Bayesian-Learning-Based Wideband Spectrum Sensing With Simplified Modulated Wideband Converter , 2018, IEEE Access.

[12]  Chunyan Feng,et al.  Sparsity Order Estimation and its Application in Compressive Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radios , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[13]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  From Theory to Practice: Sub-Nyquist Sampling of Sparse Wideband Analog Signals , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[14]  Yonghong Zeng,et al.  Sensing-Throughput Tradeoff for Cognitive Radio Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[15]  Symeon Chatzinotas,et al.  Application of Compressive Sensing in Cognitive Radio Communications: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[16]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  On the energy detection of unknown signals over fading channels , 2003, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003. ICC '03..

[17]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse solutions to linear inverse problems with multiple measurement vectors , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[18]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Sub-Nyquist Sampling for Power Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radios: A Unified Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[19]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Beyond Nyquist: Efficient Sampling of Sparse Bandlimited Signals , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[20]  Peter R. Kinget,et al.  Theory and Design of a Quadrature Analog-to-Information Converter for Energy-Efficient Wideband Spectrum Sensing , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[21]  Peter R. Kinget,et al.  Taking Compressive Sensing to the Hardware Level: Breaking Fundamental Radio-Frequency Hardware Performance Tradeoffs , 2019, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[22]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio : State-of-the-Art and Recent Advances , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[23]  Ruicheng Jiao,et al.  Discrete Exclusion Zone for Dynamic Spectrum Access Wireless Networks , 2020, IEEE Access.

[24]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  Perfect reconstruction formulas and bounds on aliasing error in sub-nyquist nonuniform sampling of multiband signals , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[25]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  Subspace Methods for Joint Sparse Recovery , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[26]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  On the Energy Detection of Unknown Signals Over Fading Channels , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[27]  Jun Yang,et al.  A Review of Sparse Recovery Algorithms , 2019, IEEE Access.