Similarity in Shape Dictates Signature Intrinsic Dynamics Despite No Functional Conservation in TIM Barrel Enzymes

The conservation of the intrinsic dynamics of proteins emerges as we attempt to understand the relationship between sequence, structure and functional conservation. We characterise the conservation of such dynamics in a case where the structure is conserved but function differs greatly. The triosephosphate isomerase barrel fold (TBF), renowned for its 8 β-strand-α-helix repeats that close to form a barrel, is one of the most diverse and abundant folds found in known protein structures. Proteins with this fold have diverse enzymatic functions spanning five of six Enzyme Commission classes, and we have picked five different superfamily candidates for our analysis using elastic network models. We find that the overall shape is a large determinant in the similarity of the intrinsic dynamics, regardless of function. In particular, the β-barrel core is highly rigid, while the α-helices that flank the β-strands have greater relative mobility, allowing for the many possibilities for placement of catalytic residues. We find that these elements correlate with each other via the loops that link them, as opposed to being directly correlated. We are also able to analyse the types of motions encoded by the normal mode vectors of the α-helices. We suggest that the global conservation of the intrinsic dynamics in the TBF contributes greatly to its success as an enzymatic scaffold both through evolution and enzyme design.

[1]  Nathalie Reuter,et al.  WEBnm@: a web application for normal mode analyses of proteins , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[2]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Discrete breathers in protein structures , 2008, Physical biology.

[3]  Robert L Jernigan,et al.  Loop motions of triosephosphate isomerase observed with elastic networks. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[4]  C. Micheletti,et al.  Convergent dynamics in the protease enzymatic superfamily. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  Rafael Brüschweiler,et al.  Identification of slow correlated motions in proteins using residual dipolar and hydrogen-bond scalar couplings. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  S J Wodak,et al.  Structural principles of parallel beta-barrels in proteins. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  W. Liu Shear numbers of protein beta-barrels: definition refinements and statistics. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Ataur R. Katebi,et al.  The critical role of the loops of triosephosphate isomerase for its oligomerization, dynamics, and functionality , 2014, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Changes in Dynamics upon Oligomerization Regulate Substrate Binding and Allostery in Amino Acid Kinase Family Members , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  C. Micheletti,et al.  Structural and dynamical alignment of enzymes with partial structural similarity , 2007 .

[11]  David Baker,et al.  Impact of scaffold rigidity on the design and evolution of an artificial Diels-Alderase , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Julian Echave,et al.  Exploring the common dynamics of homologous proteins. Application to the globin family. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Byungkook Lee,et al.  Alignment of Beta-barrels in (β/α)8 Proteins using Hydrogen-bonding Pattern , 1994 .

[14]  Nathalie Reuter,et al.  Measuring and comparing structural fluctuation patterns in large protein datasets , 2012, Bioinform..

[15]  A. Ramanathan,et al.  Evolutionarily Conserved Linkage between Enzyme Fold, Flexibility, and Catalysis , 2011, PLoS biology.

[16]  Ramakrishna Vadrevu,et al.  βα-Hairpin Clamps Brace βαβ Modules and Can Make Substantive Contributions to the Stability of TIM Barrel Proteins , 2009, PloS one.

[17]  J. Echave,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of protein vibrational dynamics. , 2008, Gene.

[18]  Peter Lackner,et al.  Accuracy analysis of multiple structure alignments , 2009, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  Nozomi Nagano,et al.  Barrel structures in proteins: Automatic identification and classification including a sequence analysis of TIM barrels , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  Lars Skjærven,et al.  WEBnm@ v2.0: Web server and services for comparing protein flexibility , 2014, BMC Bioinformatics.

[21]  Geoffrey J. Barton,et al.  Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench , 2009, Bioinform..

[22]  David C. Jones,et al.  CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. , 1997, Structure.

[23]  Nathalie Reuter,et al.  Comparing the intrinsic dynamics of multiple protein structures using elastic network models. , 2015, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[24]  D. Zerbino,et al.  Core deformations in protein families: a physical perspective. , 2005, Biophysical chemistry.

[25]  Shear numbers of protein beta-barrels: definition refinements and statistics. , 1998 .

[26]  Ian Sillitoe,et al.  Extending CATH: increasing coverage of the protein structure universe and linking structure with function , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  A. McDermott,et al.  The time scale of the catalytic loop motion in triosephosphate isomerase. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  Csaba Magyar,et al.  Locating the stabilizing residues in (α/β)8 barrel proteins based on hydrophobicity, long‐range interactions, and sequence conservation , 2004 .

[29]  Shao-Wei Huang,et al.  On the Structural Context and Identification of Enzyme Catalytic Residues , 2013, BioMed research international.

[30]  A. Lesk,et al.  Correspondences between low‐energy modes in enzymes: Dynamics‐based alignment of enzymatic functional families , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[31]  T Schlick,et al.  The loop opening/closing motion of the enzyme triosephosphate isomerase. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Modesto Orozco,et al.  Correlated motions are a fundamental property of β-sheets , 2014, Nature Communications.

[33]  R. Wierenga,et al.  The TIM‐barrel fold: a versatile framework for efficient enzymes , 2001, FEBS letters.

[34]  Modesto Orozco,et al.  Comparison of molecular dynamics and superfamily spaces of protein domain deformation , 2009, BMC Structural Biology.

[35]  Sumudu P. Leelananda,et al.  The importance of slow motions for protein functional loops , 2012, Physical biology.

[36]  Samuel L. C. Moors,et al.  The harmonic analysis of cylindrically symmetric proteins: a comparison of Dronpa and a DNA sliding clamp. , 2012, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[37]  R. Wierenga,et al.  Triosephosphate isomerase: a highly evolved biocatalyst , 2010, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[38]  Johannes Söding,et al.  HHrep: de novo protein repeat detection and the origin of TIM barrels , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  Konrad Hinsen The molecular modeling toolkit: A new approach to molecular simulations , 2000 .

[41]  Saraswathi Vishveshwara,et al.  Insights into the Fold Organization of TIM Barrel from Interaction Energy Based Structure Networks , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[42]  C. Micheletti Comparing proteins by their internal dynamics: exploring structure-function relationships beyond static structural alignments. , 2012, Physics of life reviews.

[43]  K. Verdel-Aranda,et al.  Exploring the Structure-Function Loop Adaptability of a (β/α)(8)-Barrel Enzyme through Loop Swapping and Hinge Variability. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  C. Orengo,et al.  One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  K. Hinsen,et al.  Harmonicity in slow protein dynamics , 2000 .

[46]  Sebastian Doniach,et al.  A comparative study of motor-protein motions by using a simple elastic-network model , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  A. Konagurthu,et al.  MUSTANG: A multiple structural alignment algorithm , 2006, Proteins.

[48]  Aravind Chandrasekaran,et al.  Molecular Binding Sites Are Located Near the Interface of Intrinsic Dynamics Domains (IDDs) , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[49]  Francesca Fanelli,et al.  Deciphering the deformation modes associated with function retention and specialization in members of the Ras superfamily. , 2010, Structure.

[50]  Suryani Lukman,et al.  A network of dynamically conserved residues deciphers the motions of maltose transporter , 2009, Proteins.

[51]  Csaba Magyar,et al.  Locating the stabilizing residues in (alpha/beta)8 barrel proteins based on hydrophobicity, long-range interactions, and sequence conservation. , 2004, Proteins.

[52]  C. Orengo,et al.  Plasticity of enzyme active sites. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[53]  Birte Höcker Directed evolution of (betaalpha)(8)-barrel enzymes. , 2005, Biomolecular engineering.

[54]  D. Zerbino,et al.  An analysis of core deformations in protein superfamilies. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[55]  W. Taylor,et al.  Exploring the factors determining the dynamics of different protein folds , 2011, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[56]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  What makes a protein fold amenable to functional innovation? Fold polarity and stability trade-offs. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[57]  Frances M. G. Pearl,et al.  Protein folds, functions and evolution. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  K. Hinsen Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations , 1998, Proteins.

[59]  A. Samson,et al.  Elastic network normal mode dynamics reveal the GPCR activation mechanism , 2014, Proteins.

[60]  A. Lesk,et al.  Principles determining the structure of beta-sheet barrels in proteins. II. The observed structures. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[61]  K. Hinsen,et al.  Transconformations of the SERCA1 Ca-ATPase: a normal mode study. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[62]  Andrew R Thomson,et al.  De novo protein design: how do we expand into the universe of possible protein structures? , 2015, Current opinion in structural biology.

[63]  K. Hinsen,et al.  Analysis of domain motions in large proteins , 1999, Proteins.

[64]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Coupling between Catalytic Loop Motions and Enzyme Global Dynamics , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[65]  Birte Höcker,et al.  Directed evolution of (βα)8-barrel enzymes , 2005 .

[66]  C. Micheletti,et al.  Coarse-grained description of protein internal dynamics: an optimal strategy for decomposing proteins in rigid subunits. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[67]  M. Karplus,et al.  Collective motions in proteins: A covariance analysis of atomic fluctuations in molecular dynamics and normal mode simulations , 1991, Proteins.

[68]  Sarah A. Teichmann,et al.  Evolution of oligomeric state through allosteric pathways that mimic ligand binding , 2014, Science.

[69]  Qiang Huang,et al.  Coevolving residues of (beta/alpha)(8)-barrel proteins play roles in stabilizing active site architecture and coordinating protein dynamics. , 2008, Journal of structural biology.

[70]  Ramakrishna Vadrevu,et al.  Betaalpha-hairpin clamps brace betaalphabeta modules and can make substantive contributions to the stability of TIM barrel proteins , 2014 .