Conversation effects on neural mechanisms underlying reaction time to visual events while viewing a driving scene using MEG

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) imaging examined the neural mechanisms that modulate reaction times to visual events while viewing a driving video, with and without a conversation. Twenty-four subjects ages 18-65 were monitored by whole-head MEG. The primary tasks were to monitor a driving video and to depress a foot pedal in response to a small red light presented to the left or below the driving scene at unpredictable times. The behavioral reaction time (RT) to the lights was recorded. The secondary task was a hands-free conversation. The subject pressed a button to answer a ring tone, and then covertly answered pre-recorded non-emotional questions such as "What is your birth date?" RTs for the conversation task (1043 ms, SE=65 ms) were slightly longer than for the primary task (baseline no conversation (944 ms, SE=48 ms)). During the primary task RTs were inversely related to the amount of brain activity detected by MEG in the right superior parietal lobe (Brodmann's Area 7). Brain activity was seen in the 200 to 300 ms range after the onset of the red light and in the visual cortex (BA 19) about 85 ms after the red light. Conversation reduced the strengths of these regression relationships and increased mean RT. Conversation may contribute to increased reaction times by (1) damping brain activation in specific regions during specific time windows, or (2) reducing facilitation from attention inputs into those areas or (3) increasing temporal variability of the neural response to visual events. These laboratory findings should not be interpreted as indicative of real-world driving, without on-road validation, and comparison to other in-vehicle tasks.

[1]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  G. Barkley,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic Validation Parameters for Clinical Evaluation of Interictal Epileptic Activity , 2003, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[3]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  An Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Assessing Driver Workload in the Early Development of In-Vehicle Information Systems , 2002 .

[4]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  The Effect of Switching between Sequential and Repetitive Movements on Cortical Activation , 2000, NeuroImage.

[5]  Eleanor A. Maguire,et al.  Neural substrates of driving behaviour , 2007, NeuroImage.

[6]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Brain Mapping: The Methods , 2002 .

[7]  Eric Rodgman,et al.  The role of driver distraction in traffic crashes , 2001 .

[8]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Visual attention while driving: sequences of eye fixations made by experienced and novice drivers , 2003, Ergonomics.

[9]  M. Just,et al.  A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak , 2008, Brain Research.

[10]  Li Hsieh,et al.  Visual event detection during simulated driving: Identifying the neural correlates with functional neuroimaging , 2004 .

[11]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Functional Specificity of Superior Parietal Mediation of Spatial Shifting , 2001, NeuroImage.

[12]  Li-Wei Ko,et al.  EEG-Based Assessment of Driver Cognitive Responses in a Dynamic Virtual-Reality Driving Environment , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  K. Amunts,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex is implicated in continuous switching between verbal fluency tasks: an fMRI study with clinical implications , 2002 .

[14]  Albert Kircher,et al.  Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Christopher Schreiner,et al.  Real‐World Personal Conversations Using a Hands‐Free Embedded Wireless Device While Driving: Effect on Airbag‐Deployment Crash Rates , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  J. Marshall,et al.  The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  M Corbetta,et al.  Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems? , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Kenneth W. Gish,et al.  DISTRACTIONS IN EVERYDAY DRIVING , 2003 .

[19]  J. E. Moran,et al.  Multi-Resolution FOCUSS: A Source Imaging Technique Applied to MEG Data , 2005, Brain Topography.

[20]  Krish D. Singh,et al.  Accuracy and applications of group MEG studies using cortical source locations estimated from participants' scalp surfaces , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[21]  J E Moran,et al.  ICA methods for MEG imaging. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[22]  G L Romani,et al.  A frontoparietal network for spatial attention reorienting in the auditory domain: a human fMRI/MEG study of functional and temporal dynamics. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  J. Pekar,et al.  Different activation dynamics in multiple neural systems during simulated driving , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[24]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[25]  Henrik Walter,et al.  The neural correlates of driving , 2001, Neuroreport.

[26]  X. Hu,et al.  4 T-fMRI study of nonspatial shifting of selective attention: cerebellar and parietal contributions. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Li Hsieh,et al.  Conversation effects on neural mechanisms underlying reaction time to visual events while viewing a driving scene: fMRI analysis and asynchrony model , 2009, Brain Research.

[28]  R. Hari,et al.  10 – Magnetoencephalographic Characterization of Dynamic Brain Activation: Basic Principles and Methods of Data Collection and Source Analysis , 2002 .

[29]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Different Brain Circuits Underlie Motor and Perceptual Representations of Temporal Intervals , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Pekar,et al.  Erratum: Different activation dynamics in multiple neural systems during simulated driving (Human Brain Mapping (2002) 16 (158-167)) , 2002 .

[31]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[32]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[33]  I. THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .