DIFFERENCES OF COPEPODA COMPOSITION ANALYSIS IN MARICULTURE PONDS THROUGH MORPHOLOGICAL TAXONOMY AND DIFFERENT METAGENETIC APPROACHES

. Copepods play a fundamental role in aquatic ecosystems and are an important food source for fish at an early stage. However, little attention has been given to changes in copepod communities in aquaculture water. This is mainly limited by the copepod analysis method. In this study, we designed a pair of copepod primers, Cop18SF/Cop18SR, for the analysis of copepod communities to promote the investigation of copepods in aquaculture water. Our results showed that the common-used primer pair Uni18S/Uni18SR non-specifically amplified many DNA sequences from bacteria, whereas the primer pair LSUCop-D2F/LSUCop-D2R abnormally enriched OTU denovo438, which was an unidentified Eukaryota zooplankton. Although Eurytemora pacifica was classified into 26 OTUs with 97% sequence identity using our designed primer pair Cop18SF/Cop18SR, other results indicated that the primer pair Cop18SF/Cop18SR was superior to the other two primer pairs. Moreover, different primer pairs yielded different plankton community structures, which caused their correlations with environmental factors to be obviously different. These results imply that the primer pair Cop18SF/Cop18SR can be used to analyze the dynamic changes in the copepod community structure and the relationship between the community structure and abiotic and biological factors in aquaculture water.

[1]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Distribution of Zooplankton Functional Groups in the Chaohu Lake Basin, China , 2022, Water.

[2]  Yu Sun,et al.  A Solution for Sustainable Utilization of Aquaculture Waste: A Comprehensive Review of Biofloc Technology and Aquamimicry , 2022, Frontiers in Nutrition.

[3]  Guoying Wu,et al.  Berberine Relieves Metabolic Syndrome in Mice by Inhibiting Liver Inflammation Caused by a High-Fat Diet and Potential Association With Gut Microbiota , 2022, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[4]  Yuan Gao,et al.  Seasonal variation significantly affected bacterioplankton and eukaryoplankton community composition in Xijiang River, China , 2022, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[5]  S. Willows‐Munro,et al.  Experimental validation of taxon-specific mini-barcode primers for metabarcoding of zooplankton. , 2021, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  P. Cao,et al.  Metabolic syndrome cannot mask the changes of faecal microbiota compositions caused by primary hepatocellular carcinoma , 2021, Letters in applied microbiology.

[7]  A. D. Barton,et al.  Anthropogenic climate change impacts on copepod trait biogeography , 2020, Global change biology.

[8]  M. Bensi,et al.  Copepod Community Structure in Pre- and Post- Winter Conditions in the Southern Adriatic Sea (NE Mediterranean) , 2020 .

[9]  Yankun Cao,et al.  Influence of hydropower stations on the water microbiota in the downstream of Jinsha River, China , 2020, PeerJ.

[10]  R. Nijland,et al.  Biases in bulk: DNA metabarcoding of marine communities and the methodology involved , 2020, Molecular ecology.

[11]  B. Peng,et al.  Analysis of the Relationship Between the Degree of Dysbiosis in Gut Microbiota and Prognosis at Different Stages of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2019, Front. Microbiol..

[12]  Katherine Hubbard,et al.  Assessing eukaryotic biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary through environmental DNA metabarcoding , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[13]  N. Jiao,et al.  RuBisCO large subunit gene primers for assessing the CO2-assimilating planktonic community structure in Jiaozhou Bay, China , 2018, FEMS microbiology letters.

[14]  Bangqin Huang,et al.  Distinct patterns and processes of abundant and rare eukaryotic plankton communities following a reservoir cyanobacterial bloom , 2018, The ISME Journal.

[15]  J. Ni,et al.  Opportunistic pathogens are abundant in the gut of cultured giant spiny frog (Paa spinosa) , 2018 .

[16]  B. Hansen Advances using Copepods in Aquaculture , 2017 .

[17]  Jiang‐Shiou Hwang,et al.  An analysis of how to improve production of copepods as live feed from tropical Taiwanese outdoor aquaculture ponds , 2017 .

[18]  S. Nagai,et al.  Evaluation of metagenetic community analysis of planktonic copepods using Illumina MiSeq: Comparisons with morphological classification and metagenetic analysis using Roche 454 , 2017, PloS one.

[19]  A. Tarrant,et al.  The Physiology and Ecology of Diapause in Marine Copepods. , 2017, Annual review of marine science.

[20]  M. Payne,et al.  Trait biogeography of marine copepods - an analysis across scales. , 2016, Ecology letters.

[21]  S. Souissi,et al.  Potential of the small cyclopoid copepod Paracyclopina nana as an invertebrate model for ecotoxicity testing. , 2016, Aquatic toxicology.

[22]  Frédéric J. J. Chain,et al.  Early detection of aquatic invaders using metabarcoding reveals a high number of non‐indigenous species in Canadian ports , 2016 .

[23]  G. Gong,et al.  Comparison of copepod species-based and individual-size-based community structuring , 2016 .

[24]  J. Guest,et al.  Design and Evaluation of Illumina MiSeq Compatible Primers for the 18S rRNA Gene for Improved Characterization of Mixed Microalgal Communities , 2016 .

[25]  B. V. Venmathi Maran,et al.  DNA Barcoding of Metazoan Zooplankton Copepods from South Korea , 2016, PloS one.

[26]  Jie Xiong,et al.  Taxonomic Resolutions Based on 18S rRNA Genes: A Case Study of Subclass Copepoda , 2015, PloS one.

[27]  A. Tsuda,et al.  A metagenetic approach for revealing community structure of marine planktonic copepods , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[28]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Performance comparison of genetic markers for high‐throughput sequencing‐based biodiversity assessment in complex communities , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[29]  N. Copley,et al.  DNA Barcoding of Marine Copepods: Assessment of Analytical Approaches to Species Identification , 2014, PLoS currents.

[30]  S. Prosser,et al.  A new set of primers for COI amplification from freshwater microcrustaceans , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.

[31]  G. Gerdts,et al.  Comparison of molecular species identification for North Sea calanoid copepods (Crustacea) using proteome fingerprints and DNA sequences , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.

[32]  Aibin Zhan,et al.  High sensitivity of 454 pyrosequencing for detection of rare species in aquatic communities , 2013 .

[33]  J. Bron,et al.  Observing copepods through a genomic lens , 2011, Frontiers in Zoology.

[34]  V. Chong,et al.  Copepod community structure and abundance in a tropical mangrove estuary, with comparisons to coastal waters , 2011, Hydrobiologia.

[35]  J. Pinnegar,et al.  Importance of copepod carcasses versus faecal pellets in the upper water column of an oligotrophic area , 2011 .

[36]  S. Souissi,et al.  Calanoid copepod resting egg abundance and hatching success in the sediment of the Seine estuary (France) , 2011 .

[37]  H. Ueda,et al.  Characteristics and regional classification of the copepod community in Ariake Bay with note on comparison with 3 decades ago , 2011 .

[38]  X. Zhang,et al.  Impacts of algal blooms removal by chitosan-modified soils on zooplankton community in Taihu Lake, China. , 2010, Journal of environmental sciences.

[39]  William A. Walters,et al.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[40]  M. Rajkumar,et al.  Suitability of the copepod, Acartia clausi as a live feed for Seabass larvae (Lates calcarifer bloch) : Compared to traditional live-food organisms with special emphasis on the nutritional value , 2006 .

[41]  B. Nowak,et al.  Importance of Copepoda in Freshwater Aquaculture , 2004 .

[42]  P. C. Reid,et al.  Plankton effect on cod recruitment in the North Sea , 2003, Nature.

[43]  P. Dixon VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology , 2003 .

[44]  A. Hirst,et al.  Growth of marine planktonic copepods: Global rates and patterns in relation to chlorophyll a, temperature, and body weight , 2003 .

[45]  M. F. Payne,et al.  Evaluation of diets for culture of the calanoid copepod Gladioferens imparipes , 2000 .

[46]  J. G. Bell,et al.  Lipid and fatty acid composition of normal and malpigmented Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) fed enriched Artemia : a comparison with fry fed wild copepods , 1998 .

[47]  A. Atkinson Subantarctic copepods in an oceanic, low chlorophyll environment: ciliate predation, food selectivity and impact on prey populations , 1996 .

[48]  K. Banse Zooplankton: Pivotal role in the control of ocean production I. Biomass and production , 1995 .

[49]  H. Ako,et al.  Nutritional factors affecting stress resistance in the larval mahimahi Coryphaena hippurus , 1993 .

[50]  K. Altaff,et al.  Micro-Algal Diet for Copepod Culture with Reference to Their Nutritive Value – A Review , 2021 .

[51]  Lu Han,et al.  Determination of available phosphorus in alkaline soil by molybdenum blue spectrophotometry , 2021 .

[52]  Jiamin Wang,et al.  Comparison of Two Colorimetric Methods for the Determination of Trace Ammonia in Water , 2019, University Chemistry.

[53]  L. Wu COMPOSITIONS OF PROKARYOTE COMMUNITES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO PHYSIOCHEMICAL FACTORS IN DECEMBER IN CHAOHU LAKE AND THREE URBAN RIVERS IN CHINA , 2019, Applied Ecology and Environmental Research.

[54]  J. Ni,et al.  COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND POTENTIAL NITROGEN METABOLISMS OF SUBTROPICAL AQUACULTURE POND MICROBIOTA , 2018 .

[55]  S. Souissi,et al.  Copepods as References Species in Estuarine and Marine Waters , 2015 .

[56]  S. Salzberg,et al.  FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies , 2011, Bioinform..

[57]  E. Christou,et al.  Comparison of marine copepod outfluxes: nature, rate, fate and role in the carbon and nitrogen cycles. , 2005, Advances in marine biology.

[58]  T. Kiørboe Population regulation and role of mesozooplankton in shaping marine pelagic food webs , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[59]  A. R. Wagner Molecular Biology and Evolution , 2001 .