Behaviour of food restricted broilers during rearing and lay—effects of an alternative feeding method

Broiler breeders are subjected to quantitative food restriction in order to control their growth, and this restriction is particularly severe during rearing. While such restriction improves some welfare problems associated with ad libitum feeding, it causes others: birds routinely show abnormal oral behaviours and have elevated plasma corticosterone concentration (PCC) and changes in white blood cell counts (WBCs). The aim of this study was to examine if feeding birds qualitatively restricted diets ad libitum during rearing could reduce signs of impaired welfare, as judged by behaviour and blood indices of stress, while also meeting commercially desired growth rates and uniformity. Furthermore, we examined what carry-over effects such a feeding method had on birds in the laying phase when all birds were fed on a conventional quantitative restriction regime. During rearing (1-20 weeks of age), pens of birds were either fed limited amounts of standard basal diets (Control, i.e. quantitative restriction), or ad libitum diets consisting of standard basal diets with gradually increasing levels of calcium propionate (CaP) and a constant level of oat hulls (OH), designated CaP+OH (i.e. qualitative restriction). Results showed that, during rearing, weights and weight uniformity were similar for the two groups. During feeding motivation tests, Control birds always consumed more food than CaP+OH birds. This suggests that Control birds were more highly motivated to feed than CaP+OH birds, although care has to be taken in interpreting these results. Treatment did not affect PCCs or WBCs, but there was a general decline in PCCs with bird age. All reported behaviours differed significantly between treatment groups during rearing, but disappeared during lay when all birds were fed a similar amount of food. Control birds spent up to 50% of time in object pecking during rearing periods, but this behaviour was virtually non-existent in birds in the qualitative feeding regime. Overall, the results indicate that broiler breeders can be successfully limited in growth rates by qualitative food restriction and this results in significant changes of behaviour that suggest improvements to bird welfare.

[1]  W. F. Krueger,et al.  Potential of chemical regulation of food intake and body weight of broiler breeder chicks. , 1990, British poultry science.

[2]  I. Kyriazakis,et al.  Effects of qualitative feed restriction during rearing on the performance of broiler breeders during rearing and lay. , 2005, Poultry science.

[3]  I. D. de Jong,et al.  Effects of restricted feeding on physiological stress parameters in growing broiler breeders , 2002, British poultry science.

[4]  M. Macleod,et al.  Genotype, dietary manipulation and food allocation affect indices of welfare in broiler breeders , 2004, British poultry science.

[5]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Welfare assessment of broiler breeder and layer females subjected to food restriction and limited access to water during rearing , 1993 .

[6]  H. Blokhuis,et al.  Parameters for quantification of hunger in broiler breeders , 2003, Physiology & Behavior.

[7]  C. Savory.  The relationship between food and water intake and the effects of water restriction on laying brown leghorn hens , 1978 .

[8]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Relationships between the degree of food restriction and welfare indices in broiler breeder females. , 1996, British poultry science.

[9]  B. L. Nielsen,et al.  Effects of qualitative and quantitative feed restriction on the activity of broiler chickens , 2003 .

[10]  C. J. Savory,et al.  Stereotyped pecking after feeding by restricted-fed fowls is influenced by meal size , 1999 .

[11]  Lubica Kubikova,et al.  Behavioural, Endocrine, and Metabolic Effects of Food Restriction in Broiler Breeder Hens , 2001 .

[12]  S. Rutter,et al.  Assessment of Hunger in Growing Broiler Breeders in Relation to a Commercial Restricted Feeding Programme , 1993, Animal Welfare.

[13]  I. Kyriazakis,et al.  Behaviour and welfare of broiler breeders fed qualitatively restricted diets during rearing: Are there viable alternatives to quantitative restriction? , 2006 .

[14]  C. Savory,et al.  Diurnal and individual variation in behaviour of restricted-fed broiler breeders , 1991 .

[15]  C. Savory,et al.  Influence of degree of food restriction, age and time of day on behaviour of broiler breeder chickens , 1993, Behavioural Processes.

[16]  M. H. Maxwell,et al.  Modified staining techniques for avian blood cells. , 1990, British poultry science.

[17]  Savory,et al.  Effects of qualitative and quantitative food restriction treatments on feeding motivational state and general activity level of growing broiler breeders. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[18]  M. Macleod,et al.  Different concentrations and sources of dietary fibre may improve the welfare of female broiler breeders , 2004, British poultry science.

[19]  J. Feddes,et al.  The effects of nutrient dilution on the well-being and performance of female broiler breeders. , 1995, Poultry science.

[20]  I. Duncan,et al.  Feeding behaviour in a population of domestic fowls in the wild , 1978 .

[21]  I. Duncan,et al.  Thwarting of feeding behaviour in the domestic fowl. , 1972, Animal behaviour.

[22]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Welfare assessment of modified rearing programmes for broiler breeders , 2001, British poultry science.

[23]  Y. Pinchasov,et al.  Effect of Feed Restriction Using Self-Restricting Diets on Subsequent Performance of Broiler Breeder Females , 1993 .

[24]  Bruggeman,et al.  Unidentified Factors in Jojoba Meal Prevent Oviduct Development in Broiler Breeder Females. , 1998, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[25]  J. Mench.  Broiler breeders: feed restriction and welfare , 2002 .

[26]  I. D. de Jong,et al.  Do low-density diets improve broiler breeder welfare during rearing and laying? , 2005, Poultry science.

[27]  P. Hocking.  Welfare of broiler breeder and layer females subjected to food and water control during rearing: Quantifying the degree of restriction , 1993 .